L.A. might be a sprawling and frustrating city, but one thing is for sure: when in the City of Angels, you will always be within walking distance of a fast food joint.

These bastions of greasy cuisine have spread at such an alarming rate that, last year, some people were considering stopping fast food expansion by denying licenses to would-be restaurants.

Well, the unthinkable has come to pass. Recently, L.A.'s city council decided to put a stop to the growing fast food restaurant industry in South Los Angeles by not allowing new restaurants to open.

The council cited health concerns as the reason for their decision. They hope that the temporary ban will lead to more healthy eating options. These are currently lacking in many of the South's poorer neighborhoods.

However, the numerous fast food shacks already in operation will remain open. So the law will stop the spread of fast food eateries, but it is not a quick fix.

Some people are quick to criticize the decision, saying that the city should not try to control people's dining choices. Others say that the moratorium might also stop the expansion of restaurants that are branded fast food even though they don't even have a deep fat fryer. Apparently, the council's decision will affect storefront taco stands as well.

Don't expect the debate to stop anytime soon.

A friend and I were looking through a few Improv Everywhere videos, the folks who created Frozen Grand Central, and loved this one so much we watched it twice and then showed it to others.

For anyone who has ever eaten in a food court anywhere in the world, imagine what it might be like if folks broke out into song, but not just any song--one that fit the location and the situation. This particular food court is in a shopping mall in Los Angeles.

One of the details I liked about this effort is the diversity of the entertainers, as well as, the audience members who had no idea what exactly was taking place as they chewed their food.

I loved the woman with the "baby."

Can I get a napkin, please?

My mother told me this traveler-doesn't-have-a-clue story yesterday morning after I picked her up at the Greyhound bus station in Columbus, Ohio.

I posted about this yesterday, but I'm still shaking my head and wondering where the woman is today and what she has found to eat. Perhaps she's in Missouri?

It has reminded me of other travel stories when there is nothing else to do but keep on keeping on--and hopefully, eventually, you'll get to where you want to go. It's also to make you feel better if you've ever made a travel mistake. I've made mistakes, but not quite like this.

Here is the recap:

"Where are you going?" My mother asked the woman who got on the bus in Newark, New Jersey.

"Los Angeles," the woman said.

"My!" said my mother. "That's far. When will you get there?"

"Tomorrow." The woman, according to my mother, sounded confident.

"Tomorrow?!" my mother exclaimed.

Mind you, they are on the bus on the east coast. The U.S. hasn't shrunk.

The woman nodded, still sure.

In Pittsburgh, the woman discovered the truth. She won't arrive in Los Angeles until Saturday, I think sometime tomorrow night. It is a looooonnnnnng ride.

My mother said that the woman spoke with an accent , so perhaps she misunderstood the details, or she never asked for the details. I wonder if her ticket gave her an inkling that something was amiss? Regardless, she's somewhere the middle of the U.S. by now and by tomorrow night she'll be in L.A.

This reminds me a little bit of the problem when planning international travel that involves crossing the International Date Line. When we lived in Asia I always double checked to make sure I understood exactly what day it would be when I would arrive somewhere. Missing a day can wreck havoc on plans if you're not careful.

Or there are the mistakes where you head east instead of west or the other way around. I know someone who was driving to Washington, D.C., from Columbus, but didn't discover he had gone the wrong way until he hit Indiana or thereabouts. He had recently immigrated to the U.S. which added to his sign reading difficulties and reluctance to ask for directions.

Think your airport sucks? It's ok, most people don't like their local airports. But you're in a pretty sad state of affairs when even the employees that work at that airport think it sucks.

That's what's been going on at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) recently. Employees, union members and even J D Power and Associates notables have been marching around the terminals protesting the state of the airport and the industry.

I can see where they're coming from with regard to the airport -- Terminal 2, where I spend most of my time is a run down shell of a terminal, where amenities are few, gates are crowded and dirty and a combo meal at Burger King can cost up to twelve dollars.

Just earlier this week, local Los Angeles news reported that there were over a thousand people in line over at Terminal 1.

With regard to their qualms with the industry, I'm not sure if they have much traction. Airlines are cutting back in all facets of the business, including, I'm sure, employee staffing. Any time layoffs and superfluous cost cutting are involved, employees are going to be unhappy.

Luckily, none of this ruckus seems to be (further) affecting airport operations -- as of this afternoon, the FAA isn't reporting any significant delays.

My mom just arrived back in Columbus this morning at 7 a.m. from her trip to New York City on a Greyhound bus. The bus was one minute early. Wow! I thought that she'd be late due to the wicked thunderstorm that tore through here all last night.

When I pulled into a non-parking space in front of the station (there was just enough room to maneuver behind another car actually parked at a meter), there she was with her small pull behind that she was allowed to carry-on. If she had checked it there would have been no charge.

One more point for Greyhound.

As I posted previously, my mom took the Greyhound because it was cheaper and easier than flying at the time she found out she needed to get to New York. That still seems to be the case.

Unless, you are the woman my mother told me about who got on in Newark, New Jersey.

"Where are you going?" My mother asked her.

"Los Angeles," the woman said.

"My!" said my mother. "When will you get there?"

"Tomorrow."

"Tomorrow?!" My mom wondered how that could be.

That couldn't be. When they changed buses in Pittsburgh, the woman found out she didn't have a clue. She won't arrive in Los Angeles until Saturday.

My mom said she had an accent, so perhaps when someone explained the trip details, she missed something. Obviously.

I hope she didn't have much planned for the next couple of days and thought to bring a good book with her--or several. If nothing else, she snagged the best travel mistake story I've heard in awhile.

(In case you're wondering. If you go from New York to Los Angeles, it will take 2 days, 12 hours and 25 minutes minimum and you would have had to make one bus change. Some schedules take longer with two transfers.You will have traveled 3072 miles. It costs $192 if you don't want a refundable ticket or $215 if you do. There is one ticket left for today's bus that leaves at 11 a.m.)

United and Continental published a round of super cheap fares mostly originating from Newark and into Honolulu last night for travel starting this fall into early next year.

I'm pulling up prices under 300$ total for multiple itineraries on Travelocity. Most weekends and holidays are blocked out, but if you're going to Hawaii you're going to want to take a couple of extra days off anyway, aren't you?

To find the fare, go to Travelocity.com and plug in EWR or LAX and HNL or LIH for your departure and arrival airports. Then select "flexible dates" and select May - December.

The search engine will return a variety of prices and availabilities therein; you can try the lowest fare to find dates that might work, or if availability is too tight try something more expensive.

It helps to consider the flex search as more of a general than a precise tool. If you find ballpark dates that might work for you, scoot over to Kayak or Mobissimo to do another search and do your booking -- that way you don't have to deal with going back and forth between cheapest fares and dates, making yourself all frustrated and cursing my name.

Availability for the cheapest fares from Los Angeles are harder to come by, but are there. Try tinkering around with the lowest few fares in the Travelocity search to find dates that work for you or if necessary, turn off the flex search option and just do +/- 3 day searches to work around your schedule; the first few searches I tried failed, but I ended up eventually finding midweek travel in September for 344$ total.

No telling how long this secret sale will work, so book soon and ask questions later.

Aloha!

There's a bit of strategy involved with being a pilot on reserve. At least that's the case at our company. On any given day there may be 4 our 5 reserve pilots qualified at the base to fly a particular airplane and division (domestic or international, for example.) If another pilot calls in sick or if there's an unassigned trip the next day, crew scheduling will assign a trip to the most junior pilot first, unless that pilot has more flight time for the month than the other pilots on reserve. If everyone is equal, a senior pilot may either choose to fly a trip or pass it along to the next pilot.

Why would someone choose to go to work when they don't have to?

They might want to take a two day trip tomorrow instead of a four-day trip the day after. Or they may prefer the destination or even the pilot they'd be flying with. I usually try to hold out for an interesting destination if I can.

However, due to a lack of pilots on the reserve list, more often than not you won't have any choice when crew scheduling calls. We may be short of pilots, but at least my airline hasn't resorted to using this kind of tactic to fill a trip. Camille or Myra will usually call the night before to let you know that you'll be flying a trip the next day. That was the case last weekend when they ran out of reserve pilots domestically and needed someone to fly a two-day trip to Los Angeles.

9-months ago, 14-year old McKay Hatch founded the No-Cussing Club in junior high-school. It started off with 50 members in South Pasadena, now the entire zone where approximately 25,000 people reside is cuss-free. South Pasadena has officially declared the 1st week of March as cuss-free week. (Umm...if the whole zone is anyway cuss-free I don't see the need to have a "week" for it, but it's all good).

South Pasadena has made illegal to cuss and you won't get more than a few dirty looks as punishment, but it's still a pretty cool initiative they are enforcing without the brunt of a law.

I think swearing has become part of our daily vocabulary (it is certainly part of mine); I would never swear in front of my parents or my little brother, but these days it's so commonplace it seems acceptable -- I'm not bothered too much by it now and often use bad language with both. Yes, inexcusable. Foul language is a pretty foul way to communicate, even if that is not your intention.

Little McKay's endeavor seems to also have reached a national and international scale as he boasts members from all 50 states in the US and 10,000 members from overseas.

"Leave people better than you found them" is the motto of the club; talking without using foul language is a good place to begin.

It's not so hard to come up with a list of Swedish stereotypes. Everybody seems to have one; all Swedes eats meatballs, everyone loves ABBA and all the women are blond and gorgeous. I think I could beg to differ on all accounts, but the media is certainly planning on cashing in on the last one with the new reality series Swedish Mansion. The reality show kicks off March 1, 2008 with none other than six Swedish models (and one Norwegian) all living in a house in Los Angeles.

Nobody explains the situation better than Glamour of Sweden's website: "What happens if a group of Swedish top models lives under the same roof in a mansion in Los Angeles?" To find out you will either have to watch the first phase which will broadcast online, or wait for the reality series to hit television.

Somehow I am pretty sure that this isn't going to be a show revolving around learning the ins and outs of Scandinavian culture. But at least it will fulfill your dreams of Swedish stereotypes -- if you can get past the fact that one of the models is a brunette.

Last week, somewhere, I saw a picture of Harrison Ford with his daughter on a ride at Disneyland. Turns out, according to Marla Matzer Rose who details in an article where to see stars in Los Angeles, Disneyland is a place to keep your eyes open. Here's a shot of Diane Keaton taken two years ago. Interestingly, the only celebrity I've seen in Los Angeles when I've gone there over the years is Diane Keaton.

From what Matzer Rose says, look closely at anyone with baggy sweats and sunglasses. I'd throw in a baseball hat as well. In order to see Disneyland like a star, she suggests the "A Walk in Walt's Footsteps Tour." This is a way to get the behind the scenes look at Disneyland's beginnings which includes seeing Walt Disney's apartment and a peek at Club 33, the members-only restaurant that Neil wrote about.

Even if you can't afford the $400 a room price-tag for a night in the Grand Californian, the Disney resort hotel where stars frequent, you can go on a tour of it. Matzer Rose suggests calling ahead to find out when the tours are and to make a reservation.

My thinking is that if you don't see a star, pretend that you are one. It might be kind of fun to wear dark sunglasses, baggy clothes and a baseball hat just to see if anyone might wonder who you are. My problem is, every time I go to Disneyland or Disney World it rains. Instead of looking mysterious, I end up in one of those plastic ponchos with Mickey Mouse on the back--not star material at all.

The other places Matzer Rose suggests for LA star sightings are: studio tours, coffee shops, upscale grocery stores, and independent movies. I saw Diane Keaton going to a movie. See? [via Columbus Dispatch] Here's more about star spotting at Disneyland.