Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Babies and first class: why is this an issue?
Earlier this week, I saw a story about babies and first class air travel posted on Facebook. The Facebook poster asked our own Heather Poole (flight attendant, mother, and new book author!) for her thoughts on the story, and she replied, "I'm fine with babies in first class. Usually they just sleep." Columnist Brett Snyder is a frequent flier and new dad wondering if he should use miles to upgrade his first flight with the baby. Reading the article and the many comments, I wonder: why is this (or really any story about babies and airplanes) a contentious issue?Long before I even thought about having children, I thought the same about babies in first class that I thought about anyone in the front of the plane: must be nice for them. Sure, it might be a waste of money to give a premium seat to someone whose legs don't touch the ground and who can't enjoy the free Champagne, but it's the parents' choice to splurge on the ticket. If the parents are more comfortable, the kid might be happier and thus quiet -- a win-win for everyone on the plane. Does the child "deserve" to sit up front? Perhaps not, but airplane seating has never been based on merit. To paraphrase Dr. Seuss, a passenger is a passenger, no matter how small.
I'm also fortunate to have an easy baby who so far (knock on wood) has been very well behaved on every flight. This is in part very good luck, but also due to the fact that I watch her constantly and head off any signs of crying before they start. I'll hold and feed her as often as it takes, even if it means I rarely rest anymore on a plane. Many of the same people who've given me "the look" when boarding with an infant have complimented me after on her behavior. Brett also notes in his article: "Don't just sit there while your baby screams. Do everything you can to calm him and people will be more understanding." This is good advice, but does it really need to be said?! I'd never dream of sitting by idly while my child disturbed other people and I'm embarrassed by any other parents who would consider such behavior acceptable. Still, I recognize that even with the most watchful parents, sometimes a cranky baby is unavoidable but I hope that when/if that day comes, my fellow passengers will see how hard I'm trying to make the flight easier for all of us. Better still, if I anticipate a difficult age for my baby to fly, I'll look into alternative methods of travel (or postpone until an easier time).
If we are going to ban babies from first class, or even segregate them from adults on all flights, why stop there? Why not a separate flight for the armrest-hogs, the obese, the incessant talkers, or the drunk and belligerent? I'd like a plane full of only frequent flyers, who know not to use their cell phone after the door closes, who don't rush the aisles the minute the wheels touch down, who don't recline their seats during drink service or bring smelly food (or nail polish) onto the plane. Start flights for only considerate, experienced travelers and you will find me in the front of the plane, with my baby on my lap.
For more about (considerate) travel with a baby, read my past "Knocked Up Abroad" stories here.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 8)
colpuck Mar 12th 2012 5:00PM
no objection to babies in any cabin. I do object to changing said baby in one's seat.
Eck.
Meg Nesterov Mar 13th 2012 2:46AM
No argument there! I try to sit on the aisle for easy access to the bathrooms, all airplanes have changing tables for a reason!
Juanita Figuroa Mar 13th 2012 11:46AM
There have been several occassions, while flying, when I've offered to hold a cranky baby for an obviously stressed parent. I've walked up and down airplane aisles rocking an inconsolable child while the parent straightens out food and diapers. It's the human thing to do. We're all part of the same family. And when I'm old and grey and losing my mind and wetting myself, I hope one of those infants I once held and rocked will have the same compassion on me.
Doris Brooks Mar 13th 2012 12:33PM
Where pray tell would you have a mother change her baby? Those tiny rest rooms hardly have room for one adult, much less a baby who needs a diaper change.
J-Jay Mar 13th 2012 2:18PM
Sorry; no kids if there's even a hint of them screaming. If an adult were sitting on an airplane screaming and crying and flaliling about, would you find it acceptable? Or would you ask that he be sedated and restrained until landing?
We're supposed to adjust our expectations of what's considered appropriate behaviour just because you forgot to use birth control? Sorry; no.
Lindsay Mar 13th 2012 4:01PM
I want to know why all of my flights on usair & swa have not had any changing tables?? Maybe this is something I need to discuss with the airlines, thanks for reminding me that their planes didn't have them. It was super annoying! I didn't want to change a diaper in the seat either. :(
Charley Mar 12th 2012 7:11PM
If you every want to experience a collective groan, try sitting in a packed aircraft with a late arriving mother, an infant, and accessories. Nobody wants to sit anywhere near them. There is a remedy for the obese passenger - make them buy two seats. Pacifying an irritable baby, not an easy fix.
Meg Nesterov Mar 13th 2012 2:32AM
Fair enough Charley, but I'd say there are lots of ways to calm the baby too. Lots of airlines are seating all the babies together in so-called "baby ghettos" which seems a bad idea given children tend to set each other off. A lot of it is up to the parents to choose flight times that will mean an easier baby, and a lot of space between passengers helps too!
John Mar 13th 2012 11:54AM
Yeah, but we were all babies once. I fly 100K miles per year. It's no big deal.
Dave Seminara Mar 12th 2012 9:52PM
Amen, Meg. There are lots of small hotels and B & B's that ban children as well. It's a shame. On flights, most parents make every effort to keep their babies or children as quiet as possible. Unfortunately, a very small minority are kind of clueless and just sit there while their kids scream bloody murder. When my kids act up, I at least get up on my feet, take them for a walk, try to do SOMETHING to show that I'm trying. That goes a long way.
Meg Nesterov Mar 13th 2012 2:45AM
Agreed, making an effort is key! I've been on a few flights with parents who just sat by and I don't think it's fair to anyone, especially those of us working hard to prevent meltdowns. I understand why some hotels ban children, just another reason to rent an apartment on a trip.
mary collins finn Mar 13th 2012 9:38AM
Absolutely! I just wish everyone traveling with an infant was like you!
STEPHEN Mar 13th 2012 12:19PM
Heck no. Babies should not be allowed in first class. The pressure of the air hurts teir ears and they just start wailing. What airlines should do, is offer flights just for families and thus make everyone happy. There is nothing worse than being tired or on a long flight and having some kid screaming or constantly making noise, while the parent sits there dumbfounded.
Rea Mar 13th 2012 12:34PM
It's never been the cryinh INFANT that bothers me. They can usualy be pacified by whatever they are crying about. It the screaming toddlers who are just flat out brats b/c they are not getting there own way AAARRGGGGGGG! As far as buying a ticket, don't kids under 2 fly free anymore?
sterilize them Mar 13th 2012 9:46PM
Most parents make EVERY EFFORT???? Eat a lot of paint when you were a child??? They make NO effort and thus the distaste for them and their screaming blobs...Because they are pitiful parents the whole world is supposed to adjust.. NOT
DH Mar 13th 2012 7:22AM
Parents who insist on flying with an infant who doesn't want to fly are selfish - and those with the nerve to bring their screaming obnoxious change-needing babies into first class are downright arrogant. What you parents fail to understand is that we don't find your little bundle of joy joyful. You may - and you should, but just as the decision to have a baby was yours (not ours), the responsibility for protecting us from unpleasant invasions of sound and space is yours too. Maybe you don't fly until your child can handle it. Yeah, I know that offends you, but again, you made the choice - now deal with it.
Devorah Judith Mar 13th 2012 9:39AM
You speak of accountability...not a popular position, you know. Captive audiences are not captivated by the antics of ill-behaved children especially those who are ignored by parents. Hopefully the baby ghetto idea will catch on. Parents can enjoy their children and other passengers can experience relative peace.
sunday Mar 13th 2012 9:41AM
@ DH ~ I get what you are saying, however that's just life DH. Sometimes a parent has to travel by air for whatever reason and it just cannot be helped. Like a death in the family, or a wedding, or whatever. Like the author of this article said, the parent must do everything in their power to make sure they are doing everything they can for their child to make everyones flight more comfortable (my words). But sometimes things just don't run as smoothly as you imagined it would and your child starts to cry and disturbs others nearby. It happens. Me, personally - I honestly never had to take my daughter on a plane when she was a baby. Her first time flying was when she was 6 yrs old and she was an absolute angel (quiet) for the entire flight. But then again, she was old enough to know how to behave.
My biggest complaint with children on a plane is that of the young child sitting behind me who insists on kicking the back of my seat the entire time. Talk about frustrating! And worst part is the parent of that child thinks I am the rude one for asking them to please tell their child to stop kicking my seat. Sometimes ya' just can't win!
JG Mar 13th 2012 5:03PM
RIGHT!!
smilescy Mar 13th 2012 9:42AM
Wow are our tolerance levels really that low now a days? I think a number of comments are just a tad immature. Do you think the world is still flat? There are other countries out there besides the USA and to get to them you need to fly. People get relocated through work, but I guess you expect them to take a boat for 4 weeks. Oh deer some folks can be soooooooooooo stupid.