Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Recent Comments:
Where to Find the Simpsons-Themed 7-Elevens {Gadling}
Jul 3rd 2007 11:55AM Thanks for completely ignoring the Kwik-K-Mart in Canada, we don't need no directions!
Always remember, only America exists.
Tesla's electric roadster is lean, mean and very green {Engadget}
Jul 20th 2006 2:11PM "Unless it's charged by the sun, wind, or water (nuclear power is close alternative) it's not exactly a zero emission vehicle. If your house is supplied power by a coal-fired power plant then your tailpipe resides at the powerplant."
Man I am getting tired of this stupid comment. What exactly is the point you are trying to make? Because the power may come from a plant that polutes we might as well not use it?
It is accurate to call the vehicle itself zero emissions as the vehicle itself isn't generating any. How the electricity is generated isn't the carmakers responsibility.
Saying it shouldn't be called zero emissions because the power may come from coal is like saying bread has lots of fat in it because you might put mayo on it.
Audi diesel dominates Le Mans {Autoblog}
Jun 19th 2006 6:45PM lol, no, I mean the exact opposite, why are there any rules at all? Whoever covers the most ground in the time allowed wins, the other rules make it so much less real.
Audi diesel dominates Le Mans {Autoblog}
Jun 19th 2006 2:49PM Why not an unlimited class where the rules really are the same for everyone?
Back To The Future DeLorean for sale {Engadget}
May 30th 2006 12:27PM "41. "1. The car in the movie was a manual not an automatic."
When they make cars for movies, there usualy are at least a dozen or so clones made for various reasons. Some are wrecked and others are kept in differant locations for differant scene shots."
wow... somebody missed the point, lol
An Experiment in Gas Mileage, Part 2 {Autoblog Green}
May 4th 2006 7:06PM Does "engine breaking" break your engine?
CNET tries to take down Engadget {The Jason Calacanis Weblog}
May 6th 2005 11:37AM huh? Don't get me wrong, I love Engadget but they ARE a rumour site, not that that is an inherantly bad thing. Any time there's a posting on "could this be the new...?" that's a rumour.
CNET tries to take down Engadget {The Jason Calacanis Weblog}
May 5th 2005 5:55PM I must have missed something, did the article say a single thing about ethics? or specifically the ethics of Engadget. It didn't, and it certainly didn't "try to take down Engadget" where do you see this? There's two possible answers here and neither of them are good news; either Jason is just thumping for hits, which would actually show his ethics to be in question much more than the article ever could, or he simply did not understand the column, also not exactly a reassuring sign.
