Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Mar 24th 2011 8:16PM why should the innocent lose their rights or priviledges because of what someone else is doing wrong?if their are bullie or people doing wrong on the internert kick THEM off.where is your reasoning ?because it sounds cowardly,your view is punishing the innocent and upholding the wrong doers .do you not feel that is twisted and wrong?sad sad world if thats the majority thought process which it seems to be more and more.where are the REAL righteous people who stand up for good and punish wrong.please do tell why the innocent is at fault,in your oppinion,for being bullied?hopefully you see that makes no sense after some thought but if you dont and even if you try to justify your oppinion it is still wrong regardless of how you twist it.
Jul 23rd 2010 12:44AM again someone judging with lack of information,shows ignorance.fortunately,you probably have no bearing on his life and as you dont care im sure he cares less for anything you have to say,im sure he has more money and good nature than you will most likely, at least he isnt spitting spite on someone he doesnt even know that doesnt have a clue.your oppinion doesnt matter,lol,and we are all so much better since your oppinion doesnt matter.
Apr 26th 2010 12:48AM pathetic!!!!!only morons defend something thats hurting them.you want to actually call their bluff ,speak out for a BAN against the sale of tobacco.its so bad(and it really is in my oppinion) why do they continue to sale it?for the money.its hurting healthcare costs so BAN it?why not oh,you say because people are free to choose,however that doesnt float simply because people arent free to choose to smoke herb or anything(not that im for that either,just making a point).took those freedoms under the guise they are harmful ,why not ban one (or two)that are really a huge harm to society, not only to the users but innocent bystanders, you know the 2 drugs, alcohol and tobacco.because they can make money.of course they try to save face by making it appear they are concerned by the warnings on the packs,health care statistics,telling people to quit ,new drugs to help you quit(more money for them here too),new programs to help you quit(money here too).and guess what since we are so bad for smoking we always get the extra tax(implying if we are gonna do something we shouldnt we should pay more).all a huge scam.they dont want you to quit or they would ban them period.and i dont think its your health or withdrawal they are concerned with either when quitting as some suggest.because they dont seem to let that interfere with banning other highly addicted drugs.so that dont float either.bottom line the smokers in my oppinion are the cash cows.BAN TOBACCO PRODUCTS FOR A HEALTHIER NATION,because you know as they say they dont want you to smoke anyway,lol..wink wink.my oppinion
Apr 19th 2010 12:34AM i have found that tday there are alot of greedy and ignorant people out there who confuse their education and knowledge with wisdom and guise it as so to turn a penny using the advantage that you arent supposed to argue with someone who suppsedly and allegedly knows more than you.however its clear that one knows their situation best and sometimes can be of more benefit than others.unfortunately since the common man dont have the degree,we have to depend on them for the tools.and unfortunately some dont know when to use which tools and even worse some dont listen to the patient who can advise them.sad.just my oppinion.knowledge isnt wisdom.knowing how to use knowledge the right way is wisdom.my oppinion also.
Apr 14th 2010 8:34AM Doesnt have to mean its racist that they chose a white or whatever color.ever think it could mean they were MORE qualified or just a better choice to go along with what his imaginative process wanted?(this is to those calling this a guy a racist btw)and his point that these people are racist is on point ,most just dont understand or dont want to understand because it will call attention to the bigger problem,people gaining advantages just because of their color even when they are clearly not qualified.and im not saying no one else were qualified but its clearly racist and stupid to assume there were when no one knows but the auditioner.and putting peoples biased oppinions in articles only to make the issue seem bigger ?cmon people be smarter.just my oppinion,and sorry dude but not everyones racist.
Apr 13th 2010 5:36AM One more oppinion comment.the arguement that some seem to make is "they say worse stuff than that when parents arent around" ?well some people probably run stop signs and speed when cops arent around.doesnt make it right.just as society has laws to deter those type of things for the betterment of roads and safety of people.parents should have boundaries for their children for the betterment of their future and well being of their child.and not just say well they are going to do it anyway so we should just let them.what message does that send?that you dont care?that its ok?grow up people be responsible and be parents and guide and help and play a role in their life.they depend on you to teach them and guide them so that when they are an adult that they can make the right decisions that will help them in life instead of hinder them.so dont be lazy and let them raise themselves you have a duty.just another of my oppinions as far as they movie i probably wont see it.
Apr 13th 2010 5:08AM Sad.the woman defends her view saying a kid knows what shes doing by saying the kid says she understands its just a movie and that it doesnt float in real life basically.however she cant see the movie because its bad but she can portray a vile character one of which is the reason why she cant see the movie because of the obscenities.crazy and doesnt make sense seems their values are in tact when viewing a movie but its ok to be the reason you cant see the movie?think about it.if its wrong to see it it should be obviously wrong to do it.isnt rocketscience.as for the comment about health care people are stealing,nah they are just taking back a very small decimated amount that the rich and greedy stole from them under the delusion that there sweat was worth more than say a minimum wager.funny a note on that topic ,wondering why republicans are called conservative s and democrats liberals?imagine its a republican idea that came up with that.cause its backward it seems to me.republicans and the rich are only conservative with their money and liberally spend everyone elses under the guise they are either entitled or its for everyone.democrats seem more conservative they want the ones who have been stolen from the poor and taken advantage of ,the poor,to keepp some of their money and the greedy rich undeserving few whine about having to play fair just in fraction amounts.thats my oppinion.