Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Recent Comments:
'Saw 3D' Accidentally Screens for Kids; Subsequently Scars Them For Life {Moviefone Blog}
Nov 21st 2010 12:51AM If you think that Jaws is scary, intense, or gory, you should see the movie Deep Blue Sea.
What Happens if You Decline a Full Body Scan? {AOL Travel News}
Nov 17th 2010 7:51AM It's not a pornographic image.
Nudity itself is not pornographic.
'Blue Valentine' NC-17 Rating Update: Producers Complain; Not Re-Editing Film {Moviefone Blog}
Nov 3rd 2010 3:59AM In American culture in general, violence is considered more acceptable than nudity or sex in entertainment.
You could go to jail for showing nudity to a child. You would never go to jail for showing violent content to a child.
There is no scientific evidence that nudity ever has any negative effect on anyone at all.
Cedar Point named best U.S. amusement park {Gadling}
Sep 14th 2010 4:16AM You should go to Cedar Point on a day OTHER than Saturday when school is universally in session. The lines are then FAR shorter.
When I went to Cedar Point on Wednesday, May 26, 2010, the first time I rode Top Thrill Dragster that day, I got on it in less than 10 minutes. And every time I rode it that day, the wait was less than 30 minutes.
Are Too Many Movies Being Shot in 3-D? {Asylum}
Jul 31st 2010 2:12AM Cliff:
Incorrect.
The reason that colored glasses mess up the colors is, well, the glasses' lenses are colored. The focal point has nothing to do with it.
All polarized lenses are clear. There is no such thing as smoke colored lenses.
Modern 3D uses either polarized glasses or shutter glasses -- and NEITHER of those display only a part of the screen to each eye. Both of those technologies overlay the left and right eye images on top of each other, and filter out the other eye's image. You do NOT have to move your head to see items on the side of the screen.
Are Too Many Movies Being Shot in 3-D? {Asylum}
Jul 30th 2010 11:29PM John F.C. Taylor:
I've said this many times before and I'll continue to say it:
IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE A MOVIE IN 3D, YOU DON'T HAVE TO. There are, and will remain, plenty of theaters that only show 3D movies in 2D.
Are Too Many Movies Being Shot in 3-D? {Asylum}
Jul 30th 2010 11:26PM Marcy:
Only a tiny percentage of people are that way. And they should just watch the movie in 2D. There are, and will remain, plenty of theaters that only show 3D movies in 2D.
There is no good reason at all for a movie not to be filmed in 3D.
Are Too Many Movies Being Shot in 3-D? {Asylum}
Jul 30th 2010 11:19PM It sometimes updates right away, and sometimes doesn't post at all. This is confusing.
Are Too Many Movies Being Shot in 3-D? {Asylum}
Jul 30th 2010 11:15PM Sorry for posting twice -- this comments system has a problem where it doesn't update right away.
Are Too Many Movies Being Shot in 3-D? {Asylum}
Jul 30th 2010 11:13PM antisocialfatman:
You should NOT be against 3D -- only against poorly-done 2D to 3D conversions.
Filming a movie in 2D and then converting it to 3D is like filming a movie in grayscale and then converting it to color. (Actually, the former is even more difficult.)
If a new movie is filmed in 2D and then converted to 3D, that is an indication that the 3D with that movie is being done just to make money.
