Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Sep 28th 2012 2:49PM Actually, Tom, I was. New here. Is CC one of "those"?
Aug 13th 2012 8:25PM Oregon has gone south. Or is it they have brought California north? Either way, their government is leading Oregonians down the same path that the mental midgets in CA permitted them too. And now they're being called on to pay the piper.
In this case it is the same- over-regulation of simple things. Next thing you know their "elected" dictator's will be asking those who pay their salaries to follow behind them and sweep up their droppings- like the horses-arses they are.
May 10th 2012 11:18AM Don't care where they go to die. Just tell me where all the Reid-backing Nevadan voters are buried.
May 5th 2012 10:38AM Eric, to your other post above, you had it right, but reversed the letters in God. Obama IS what he eats.(Ate?).
Feb 28th 2010 6:46PM So, what's the big deal? Canada was heavily favored to win, and almost blew it in the final minutes. The disgrace if they lost would have been a national disaster, after all, you get nothing but it's THEIR game. So, they won. But not the World Juniors, and for a long time now, they haven't even been in the running for Lord Stanley's Cup. And THAT is a big deal. Salve your wounds with the Gold. You earned it. And we'll see how long you can keep it. Like the Stanley Cup, there are a LOT of teams out there that are capable of seeing that it'll be a LONG time before you see that again!
Feb 27th 2010 1:18PM They should face charges, especially the under-age drinker who knew better. But they won't because they are Canada's Golden Girls. So much for the rule of law. But don't try it yourself!
Nov 10th 2009 4:03PM You are so lacking in reasoning that you make it possible to believe that not only was Darwin right, but you are living proof, one generation of it!
Nov 7th 2009 9:02AM Amen, brother! This PC stuff does nothing but continue to perpetuate racial differences and acts as a barrier to eliminating them. We should be angry at ALL crime. Interesting that we now have suspect descriptions without reference to color. Now the number of possible suspects that fit a description is much greater, making the suspect much harder to find. Color has nothing to do with crimes committed. Anyone with any sense knows that.
And now we will have more crimes on our own due to this "Hate Crimes" bill just passed. All the prosecutor has to do when there is a black on white crime committed is yell, "hate crime" and a brother is gone even longer!
Some laws are just bad. This one is worse.
Nov 7th 2009 8:54AM Re: Black Historian.
What next? For the sake of being "kind" to our children we should NOT let them be part of an historically accurate enactment?
Fine, then what are we going to do when we have them act out as Hitler, Mao Tze Tung,or Stalin?
I think we are better off if we let them experience where we came from instead of encouraging them to be led into areas I don't think they should go. And yes, I AM a teacher.
Nov 4th 2009 10:20AM Deviants, perverts, pedophiles, whatever! The false preaching that they "can't help themselves" because "we were born this way" has repeatedly been disproved. However, since they are too involved in their own little sexual self-gratification world (except where children are concerned, perhaps a little science, from their OWN Liberal Leftist views, might help clear things up.
Darwin (and Liberal Leftists) preach evolution to explain change over time. OK there. Where they go wrong is the idea that a "gay" gene (which they claim "makes" them act the way they do, must be INHERITED. You INHERIT your genes. From BOTH parents. Now, with that in mind, if the PARENTS were genetically flawed(flawed genes do not reproduce themselves in succeeding generations- BECAUSE they are flawed!), they would have been homosexuals themselves, and their sexual proclivities would have created NO offspring. (Unless, of course, they were BI-SEXUAL, which is a CHOICE.) Obviously an evolutionary dead-end. In simpler terms, queers can NOT reproduce a following, or genetically sustaining, generation. Simpler still, they would disappear from the earth. (SPARE ME YOUR FEEBLE ATTEMPTS AT REBUTTAL. I KNOW GREGOR MENDEL'S PRINCIPLES OF GENETICS, and have been following modern genetic studies for decades. There IS NO "queer gene"!)
Obviously, any intelligent person understands this, and would allow them to have their "marriages" because they would then cease to exist since their could be NO offspring to replace them. End of sexual deviancy.
HOWEVER, genetic cause for sexual deviancy is NOT the case. THERE IS NO 'GAY' GENE!
That leaves them with two other means of sustaining their population: the choosing of the deviant life-style, or the recruitment to that life-style. Which is, of course, a choosing in and of itself.
Where the latter happens among adults is one thing, how they (actively now are trying to) accomplish recruitment is another. They HAVE and ARE infiltrating the Public Schools, presenting their sexual aberrancy as a NORMAL behavior. The use of their status as an "authority figure" allows, nay, almost certainly, encourages children exposed to same to emulate the behavior modeled to/for them. (LOOK TO YOUR SCHOOL CURRICULUM, PARENTS! IF IT IS NOT ALREADY THERE, IT IS MOST CERTAINLY ON THE WAY!) Thus sexual deviants are able to recruit to, and sustain, behavior that would otherwise disappear in one generation.
You can't fool nature. And try as they might, queers are NOT natural, and never will be. They can only ebb and flow. Like all plagues and diseases.