Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
TSA To Permit Pocket Knives And Golf Clubs On Planes (But Still Not Liquids)
Starting April 25, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will permit small knives and most sporting good equipment on planes in carry-on luggage, a new security conference held today revealed.Bloomberg reported that the change is to conform with international rules, citing that travelers will be able to carry on knives with "retractable blades shorter than 6 centimeters (2.4 inches) and narrower than 1/2 inch at the widest point," and that "the agency is moving away from uniform procedures that apply to every passenger and toward efforts to perform background checks on passengers before they arrive at an airport."
Larger knives and items such as box cutters and razor blades must still be checked.
Sport equipment is also on the updated list of items allowed in carry-on luggage, including hockey sticks, ski poles and up to two golf clubs. Many baseball and softball bats will still be prohibited, but lightweight plastic, wiffle and novelty bats will be excluded from the ban.
The organization has not relaxed its ban on liquids over 100ml, however, and isn't likely to do so anytime soon.
This is, of course, mildly disconcerting to the already nervous traveler – what golfer travels with just two clubs? Who carries hockey sticks on a plane? Do they fit in the overhead compartment? Couldn't you do just as much damage with a five iron as you could with a baseball bat?
"These are popular items we see regularly," agency spokesman David Castelveter said. "They don't present a risk to transportation security."
What do you think? Will you now be bringing your putter and pocketknife on the plane?
[Image Credit: redjar]
Filed under: Airports, Consumer Activism, Travel Security












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Terry Mar 5th 2013 2:16PM
Personally, I love it. I'll be glad to rent clubs, just let me have my putter and my driver and I'll rent everything else. Than ks TSA.
john murray Mar 5th 2013 2:20PM
WHY?
Regis Ruin Mar 5th 2013 2:25PM
So maniacs can take their golf shivs back to the Middle East?
I hear Ahmed 'Panther' Awood is coming to the US to compete on the PGA tour, so carrying in clubs should be easier now for him. Since he is from the Middle East, he is elated that golf matches are sometimes settled in 'Sudden Death'.
Conrad Clough Mar 5th 2013 2:55PM
I commonly carry a pocket knife on me, so this will be one less thing I have to worry about remembering to place in my checked luggage... but overall I don't see this having much of an effect on air security either way.
Ralph Mar 5th 2013 3:05PM
I carry a small pocket knife with me everywhere I can. It is a TOOL. Yes, it could be used as a weapon, but a small one. That's why when I fly now I carry a pair of leather gloves in my pocket so I won't dirty my hands beating the snot out of somebody that tries to use something like this as a weapon.
Bosox501 Mar 5th 2013 3:43PM
The TSA is a reflection of the Federal Government, simply stated Pathetic. Is there anything the Fed Gov does in an effective and efficient manner. Nothing, TSA, Amtrack, is a shining example, since the gov took over RR service, they have cut service, some of the largest cities in the US are not serviced by train, example Houston, Tx. If you take a train from Miami FLa to Chicago Ill, you must go through Washington DC. You could walk to Chicago faster and of course it looses a ton of money, ever year they go back to Congress to more and more money, why should they try to improve, they just go to Congress and demand more and they get it. Who else would spend a ton of money on trains capable of going 150 mph and run on a restricted roadbed where the top speed permitted is 60mph or there about. They brag how fast the train is capable of running, how utterly sad and pathetic. Now they want to build a line from the Mahovie Dessert to Las Vegas, tracks are already in place from LA to Vegas, can't use them, might hurt a dessert insect. So we will spend millions more. How sad, how sad, ah what does th govenment care, they need more money, just raise taxes. Pathetic!
gary Mar 5th 2013 4:34PM
we pay a fortune to subsidize air and highway travel. who pays for the tsa, for the airports, for the faa tower people and radar installations, and the highways.
rail is a good alternative for travel of three hours of less. you save two hours and the hassle of the tsa at the airport.
nothing wrong with govt. subsidizing transportation.
lfergie812 Mar 5th 2013 6:22PM
To those that don't fly there is something wrong with subsidizing air travel. We're paying for something that does not benefit us directly. No different than subsidizing farmers to not grow any crops. Does not benefit anyone but those getting welfare from the government.
john Mar 6th 2013 6:29PM
what the heck are you on about again? I got lost in that essay..
Thomas E. Gunn1 Mar 5th 2013 4:21PM
I think it should be required that every passenger carry a loaded pistol aboard every flight. This would gaurantee there will never be another hijacking, and passengers will likely be a lot more polite and considerate to one another. Peace through mutually assured destruction.
jimmy Mar 5th 2013 3:49PM
That's a relief.I bring my hockey stick everywhere.
Tom Huskey Mar 5th 2013 3:59PM
I want to bring my Leatherman!!
chuckl4826 Mar 5th 2013 4:23PM
What next.."small guns"?
mg Mar 10th 2013 11:28PM
I hope so, it is about time.
Bruce Mar 5th 2013 4:27PM
Break your golf club in half and you now have two lethal stabbing weapons that can do more damage with your open pocket knife jammed into the end of one of them.
Bosox501 Mar 5th 2013 5:40PM
Gary, my man, next time you fly anyplace look closely at the cost of your ticket, believe me you are paying plenty, all the additionl fees and look at the fees and what they pay for, additionally, the airlines pay through the nose for "Gates", every taxi, every bus pays to go on the airport property. Airports are making a ton of money, airlines go bankrupt, when is the las time you heard of an airport loosing money, believe me they don't, you and every user pays for everything, the pretty flowers, water beds and plants, your paying and every othe flyer is paying, if your flight has a stop, that is called a segment, you may double, don't believe me, check your ticket stub my friend. Subsidize RR is ok, well then perhaps they can subsidize my mortgage, or my kids tution, how about college loan payments, they can subsidize that as well. The gov gets the money to do all this subsidizing from one sourse, you and me and everyone else. By defintion, Gary, the government can't do anything effectively or efficiently, the post office, the rr, medicare, social security, everything looses money yet Fed Ex, UPS, Union Pacific, etc all make money, They my friend are effective and efficient, they are private, hell they even pay dividends. The government on the other hand is simply sad and pathetic.
Linwood Wade Mar 5th 2013 6:04PM
You are right on the money Bosox. I wish you were President!!!
rreef1993 Mar 5th 2013 7:07PM
It is time to shut down the TSA 50 million dollars for new uniforms when Napalatono is saying no money and lines will be longer. She needs a lesson in economics.
vin Mar 5th 2013 9:06PM
Stupid!
renee Mar 5th 2013 8:34PM
You can GROPE any part of my body & now I can carry a knife on board.....WTF