Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Is There A Perfect Way To Board A Plane? Researchers Say Yes
It's little surprise that China is crowded. Given a booming population that can afford to fly – and without an equally booming plane population – researchers in Beijing have been examining ways to make boarding planes most efficient.The idea is to accommodate the heightened Chinese flying demand and relative scarcity of planes. Western Australia's ScienceNetwork reports that researchers are doing something new by looking into boarding patterns, as opposed to just luggage congestion and takeoff scheduling.
The findings? Move over, screaming children and slowpokes.
The researchers found that there is an "optimal" way to board a plane, and it involves categorizing passengers by their "individual properties."
Under our current model of assigned seating, passengers at the front can reach their fastest possible boarding speed, but after that things slow down. The "optimal" system would categorize you by your luggage type, timeliness at the gate and other factors, and sort you into boarding order that way.
Although this is nice in theory, there are some obvious problems. Math can't, after all, account for factors like passengers' personalities, how distracted they are or even how large they are. Oh, and the fact that humans aren't generally as predictable as variables in an equation.
[Image credit: Flickr user Reuben Whitehouse]
Filed under: Asia, China, Airlines, Airports, Consumer Activism













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
John Mangione Nov 14th 2012 11:19AM
There is only one intelligent way to board an aircraft: from the back of the plane forward. That is, if your seat is in the very last row, you should get on first, and if your seat is in the very front, you should get on last.
Anything else is ill-thought out.
There is some level of "classism" going on, since the people who pay the most money are told to board first. This is as stupid an idea as one could have on the matter.
Dr. V. Nov 14th 2012 11:44AM
Well put. I agree. Would only add limiting passengers to carry-ons smaller than the kitchen sink.
DENNIS Nov 14th 2012 2:21PM
WANT TO SOLVE THE CARRY \-ON DEBACLE? CHARGE FOR CARRY-ON BAGGAGE, NOT CHECKED BAGGAGE. WORST PART OF FLYING? CARRY-ON!!!!!!!!!
Dorika Nov 15th 2012 10:37AM
Very interesting your article, make me feel relax as well as http://jocuricutomsijerry.3eeweb.com