Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Controversial Nude Sculpture Opens In Former Coalmine

The 1,200-foot piece of art, with breasts rising almost 100 feet, is carved into the landscape, with the goal being to compete with the Angel of the North, a contemporary angel sculpture, and earn over £1million (about $1,600,400) each year. Visitors can now stroll along a four-mile system of paths along the woman's curves to various viewing platforms on her face, breasts, hip, knee and ankle.
Originally intended as a gift to the public to atone for the mine's disruption, The Banks Group, the mining company that extracted the coal, worked with Viscount Ridley, who owns the estate, and American artist Charles Jencks to create the masterpiece. However, the sculpture is causing controversy from people who think it's ridiculous and demeaning to women.
"I don't believe it is demeaning to women, men or the human species as a whole, in fact it celebrates all of that," Jencks told the Daily Mail. "... I profoundly believe that, given time, people will not find any offense in this, and will grow to love her."
What's your opinion?
Filed under: Arts and Culture, Stories, Europe, United Kingdom, News












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Bill Egelund Sep 9th 2012 5:16PM
It''s beautiful, not demeaning.
aboona J Sep 10th 2012 2:16PM
Story remind me of Marie's attempt at sculpture on "EL Raymond". Hysterical -- still makes me laugh when it comes to mind outa nowhere!.
Bob Sep 10th 2012 2:30PM
Unless your in the air you can't see it it's great
Sparky Sep 11th 2012 8:26AM
That thing is tits!
Lynn Sep 10th 2012 3:10PM
A waste of five million dollars is what it is.
cutebbwcandy Sep 10th 2012 3:56PM
That is cute but, I would have much better it been a photo of a man. I kinda get tired of looking a naked females LOL.
jerry Sep 10th 2012 3:57PM
my kid can draw better than that
Block Sep 11th 2012 12:23PM
well, its not a drawing....
susan Sep 10th 2012 4:06PM
How come it's always a woman..Can't we ladies get a naked man sculpture once in a while?
Andy Sep 10th 2012 4:12PM
Then you could climb the "tower" !
paperbeach Sep 10th 2012 9:47PM
You mean like Atlas? The Thinker? The Sistine Chapel?
Check out some of Andy Warhol's stuff, too.
bill Sep 10th 2012 4:13PM
Dumbest thing I ever saw, but it was not my money so who cares. I know the artist is laughing all the way to the bank.
beth Sep 10th 2012 4:38PM
what was the point of giving her breasts?
Andy Sep 10th 2012 4:10PM
There's an extra pair up in the left corner!
Delby Sep 10th 2012 4:10PM
Okay, seriously they spent 5 million dollars making that thing? I could have done a better job for free!
Phillip Sep 10th 2012 4:37PM
The $5 million went to restore the land, make ponds, bring in landfill. It becomes a walking, jogging, bike path park... Instead of a hole in the ground. Why do some people only see the negative things in life?
P. KELLER Sep 11th 2012 5:01AM
THAT IS THE MOST RIDICULOUS PIECE OF WASTED MONEY I HAVE EVER SEEN...$4,801,200....WITH BREASTS 200 FEET HIGH...REALLY... GIVE ME A BREAK...THE ONLY WAY A PERSON CAN TELL WHAT IT IS , IS FROM THE SKY...WHAT A WASTE !!
a man Sep 10th 2012 5:34PM
This isn't demeaning to women. It is demeaning to the world of art, however. This "thing" looks disgusting. If that is supposed to be the body of a woman, then the person who created it has never seen a female. Just look at it----the head of the Incredible Hulk, breasts, and the side view of a very large hip and legs. I can't even see the arms!!! It looks like someone had some extra rocks and bushes and wanted to get rid of them----and this is the result.
kitzer Sep 10th 2012 7:27PM
Geez -- I didn't know that up-tight, teabagger, prudes had influence in England!!
Belldn3 Sep 10th 2012 9:16PM
The aliens are getting horny. Now it's going to hit the fan.