Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
America's Nuclear Sites Could Become National Parks
New legislation has been introduced to Congress that could make three sites that played a vital role in creating America's nuclear weapons program during World War II into national parks. If passed, the legislation would provide resources to preserve the sites and make them accessible to visitors for the first time.The three sites include the national laboratories in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Los Alamos, New Mexico, as well as the Hanford Nuclear Reactor in Washington. Each of the locations played a key role in the Manhattan Project, the top-secret program tasked with developing the first atomic weapons. For instance, Oak Ridge was used to enrich uranium for the project while Hanford produced plutonium. The two bombs that were dropped on Japan prior to their surrender were assembled at Los Alamos.
Over the years, portions of each site have fallen into disrepair and have been slated for demolition. They have also remained under a veil of secrecy that has kept them off the radar for many Americans and downplayed their significant role in ending the war, not to mention shaping global relations in the decades that followed. By turning them into national parks the sites will be preserved for their historical value and allow the general public to enter for the first time.
The earliest vote on the legislation could come later this week. If the bill is eventually passed, and the locations do indeed become parks, the emphasis will be on their significance in American history and not the glorification of nuclear weapons. It is true that the Manhattan Project managed to create the world's first atomic bombs but perhaps more importantly it also helped to usher the U.S. onto the world stage as a post-war superpower.
Filed under: Arts and Culture, History, Learning, North America, United States, News










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Liz Aug 7th 2012 2:28AM
I hope everyone knows that the management of our National Parks has been turned over to the United Nations. Signs at the entrance of National Parks state "An International Biosphere Reserve". I have been told that this wording has been removed from many signs. You can confirm this information by googling "International biosphere reserve". Making these sensitive areas our National Parks now makes me more than a little nervous. Wonder what the management by other countries really has in mind for these places. What has happened to this wonderful country???
Handsomish Aug 7th 2012 3:42AM
These international Biospheres are only designated at a few parks in our country, and at many sites around the world. If you had taken the time to ask about the program you would have realized that these locations are significant enough that the world agrees they need protecting. The majority funding for these sites in the US still comes from park visitors and and the federal government. But is subsidized in part from the UN, so as to help maintain the protections of the parks. There are over 500 worldwide in over a 100 countries. There are 47 in the US. Most notably the Everglades, Big Thicket, Big Bend, Great Smokey Mtns, Congaree, Glacier, Isle Royale, Olympic and Yellowstone. If you have visited any of these locations, you realize the importance of saving these locations, and if it takes worldwide intervention, I have no problem. This program only preserves parks that are natural environments, so you won't see this sign at Los Alamos or Gettysburg. You've got a computer, use it to educate yourself before posting irrational comments.
KheSahn068 Aug 7th 2012 2:32AM
Three more potential new National Parks? Geez, not in my life time. I thought that there was no more money to be had and that is why the Fed's are closing down (if not cutting back again) Federal Parks. Wait! I forgot! Obama will just pull out his printing press and print out another trillion dollars to spend. "My Bad!"
Handsomish Aug 7th 2012 3:42AM
Those who fail to remember the past will repeat them. That is the reason for keeping places like this for a historical reference. There are things worth saving in our nation and they provide an education for our youth, and the world. They also offer conservation for our populace, both future and past generations, to realize what wonders do exist. I have a feeling that you have never visited our National Parks, and without experiencing them, have no sense of their importance.
KheSahn068 Aug 7th 2012 3:57AM
TO HANDSOMISH: I agree to your assessment as stated above. However, you fail to see the hypocrisy of our Federal Government when it does come to our natural resources and the amount of money AND professional Parks and Vendors that it takes to care for all our parks. The current administration, as well as the present Governor of California, thinks that cutting funding and personnel won't hurt the parks which in all reality will literally destroy them. Also, and I really hate to bust your proverbial bubble regarding that "I have a feeling that you have never visited our National Parks, and without experiencing them, have no sense of their importance" is a complete, distasteful statement when you don't know who you are talking to. I am currently on the Board of Conservancy in my state that overlooks the maintenance and welfare of both state and federal parks within the Region 3 area.