Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Galley Gossip: In Defense Of Old And Weary Flight Attendants
If you want to talk safety, Bill, let's talk safety. But what's with using "weary" and "overweight" to describe 60-year-old flight attendants? Maybe the point you were trying to make in your article about airline bankruptcy is that new labor is cheap labor. What you've seem to have forgotten is times have changed over the last thirty years and some airlines now deliberately hire older people in an effort to save money on retirement and pensions. And did you know new flight attendants start out making between $14,000-18,000 in the first year? Each year we're given an across-the-board raise with most flight attendants maxing out around the 13-year mark. Flight attendants don't cost the airlines half as much as the airlines would love the flying public to believe.
Going back to safety, Bill, let's ask the passengers on board US Airways flight 1549 how they felt about the crew who evacuated a plane full of 150-plus passengers after the aircraft ditched into the Hudson River. The entire crew of the "Miracle on the Hudson" (including Captain Sullenberger) was over 50, leaning closer to 60. I'd say they did a wonderful job of getting passengers out safely. Personally, I'd be more concerned with my fellow passengers moving quickly than I would be about flight attendants of any age – after all, we are only allowed to work if we can pass a yearly recurrent training program. Passengers just have to buy a ticket.
Now, as for being excited to come to work, it's true that sometimes it's hard to love passengers who verbalize how miserable they feel about flying, especially when these same passengers go on to wonder why we aren't younger and prettier. Last time I checked, flight attendants were people, too. I know it's hard to believe but we, too, are allowed to grow old just like passengers. I'm talking to you, Bill!
But Bill is not alone.
I'm going to have to go with sexist caveman. Of course Cowardly - er, I mean Cowley, deleted his twitter account soon after he got into it with a female journalist over the comments.
In my book, "Cruising Attitude," I mention that ageism is not only alive and well at 30,000 feet but those who still hold these outdated beliefs have no problem expressing them to the very people they're talking about. Once, right after I told a passenger that my mother was also a flight attendant (she's "junior" to me, meaning she started flying AFTER I became a flight attendant), he informed me he found it unsettling to stare at postmenopausal women pushing beverage carts for three hours – as if buying an airline ticket entitled him to eye candy. Of course, he wasn't much to look at either. But I'd take nice, thoughtful passengers over good-looking, younger ones any day!
Bill wraps up his outdated rant against flight attendants with this: "Take a good look at the superannuated attendants next time you board a legacy airline. They are as tired of flying as those of us that have been doing it for thirty years, but it's the customers who pay the price."
Maybe it's the recession, because people always find this one tough to believe, but it's the customers who are NOT paying the price, since ticket prices are cheaper than they were twenty years ago. This is why service has gone downhill. This is also why there are less flight attendants on board to help passengers. And if I or one of my more senior colleagues looks tired or weary, I apologize. Keep in mind it might have something to do with the airlines cutting back to save money. They've decreased my layover time in an effort to save money on hotels. Most domestic layovers average 9-10 hours these days. Add a delay and it's 8 hours behind the locked door. That's barely enough time to eat, sleep AND shower. Personally I think it should be illegal to work flights that are longer than our layovers, but hey, that's me. What do I know?
[photos courtesy of santheo and alexindigo]