Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-28-2012 @ 10:30AM
LOUIS BRINSKELLE said...
I don't understand the negativity of some of these posters. This sounds like a great idea. By evacuated I believe they will lower pressure in tube to reduce friction with air while suspending and propelling the car using moving magnetic fields. The curve issue can be solved by making the curves full arc over a great distance minimizing g forces. If everyone though like you folks our wheels might have been square. Punching out.
Reply
3-28-2012 @ 10:57AM
Robert said...
The energy cost of establishing and maintaining a vacuum in such a large volume, with such an extremely large surface area (the vacuum boundary,) is so exhorbitant as to make this approach utterly foolish. (In Fantasy Land though, you could do it.) Similar engineering economics make magnetic levitation financially untenable as well. If you'd like though, go ahead and complain about reading honest feedback on it, or defend it, or advocate it if you like.
Fools like Daryl Oster are camouflage for the real innovators developing solutions that work.