Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Viking hoard highlights the value of responsible metal detectoring

When I used to work as an archaeologist, I heard a lot of bad-mouthing about metal detectorists. These guys scan the ground for coins and other metal objects. Most of the time they only find a few old pennies. It's when they discover something of historic value that some archaeologists get grumpy. Many archaeologists don't trust metal detectorists, saying they disturb ancient sites and pocket their findings.
This week's discovery of a Viking hoard of silver in England shows how responsible metal detectorists, far from being nosy snoopers into the sacred soil of archaeology, can actually help us learn more about the past.
The hoard, found near the appropriately named village of Silverdale, Lancashire, includes silver brooches, coins, arm-rings, and ingots. There are 201 pieces in all, weighing more than two pounds, and they were buried around 900 AD. While artistic value of the jewelry is priceless, it's one of the coins that tells us something really significant. It's of a type never before seen and bears the inscription AIRDECONUT which may represent the Scandinavian name Harthacnut. There's a famous Viking king by that name, but he lived a century later and his coins look different, so this appears to be a previously unknown Viking king.
Interestingly, the other side reads DNS (Dominus) REX, with the letters arranged in the form of a cross. This was a period when Vikings were beginning to abandoned the old gods like Thor and Odin and turn to Christianity. Also in the horde was a fake silver coin made from copper with a thin silver wash, and Islamic coins from the Middle East.
This isn't the first time a metal detectorist has found evidence for an unknown ruler. Back in 2004, a man using a metal detector uncovered a Roman silver coin in Oxfordshire dating to 271 AD and bearing the face of Emperor Domitianus II. This military officer had been garrisoned in Britain and took advantage of the chaotic political situation to proclaim himself emperor. He minted some coins to celebrate the occasion but his rule only lasted at most for a few weeks. The coin was part of a hoard of about 5,000 coins. This coin is now on display at the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford.
In both cases, the lucky guys did the right (and legal) thing--they reported their finds to the proper authorities. Laws governing such finds differ from country to country, but it's always important to report anything you find that may be of historical significance. You never know, you might have discovered a new king.
Photo courtesy Portable Antiquities Scheme.
Gallery: Lucky metal detector finds
Filed under: History, Learning, Europe, United Kingdom












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Jan Ross Dec 17th 2011 2:21PM
Interesting article but (so sorry!) you fix to fix your spelling of "horde" to "hoard".
Dick Jordan Dec 17th 2011 4:13PM
As Jan's comments suggests, Viking hordes might have hoarded hoards, but they wouldn't have hoarded hordes.
Next time get Don George to edit your copy before it's published.
David Burlison Dec 17th 2011 6:52PM
Thanks for a great travel blog..
One stop site to travel NYC:
http://travelaskthelocals.yolasite.com/new-york-city.php
brian Dec 18th 2011 10:40AM
Sorry but that is a strawman arguement. Archaeologists have worked with responsible amateurs for quite a long time. The keyword there is responsible. There are quite a few metal detectorists/collectors who want no part of responsibly reporting their finds and violate federal laws by illegally hunting arttifacts on government property. THESE are the folks that archaeologists have a beef with. Responsible amateurs help keep public interest in archaeology alive. It's the irresponsible types that give everyone a bad name.
Andrew Lehr Dec 18th 2011 11:54PM
I do not know... yet but since this is interesting, I will surely look it up so that I can chit chat about it around the water cooler.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111213224312AA4IKm4