Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Cruise ship prison? Not so fast say Scientology captors
A cruise ship prison story has been floating around about an Australian woman who says she was held for years against her will aboard the cruise ship Freewinds, a floating Scientology cathedral of sorts. To many, the idea of living aboard a cruise ship might seem like a dream come true. To Valeska Paris, held on the ship starting in 1996 then spending the next twelve years there against her will, it was much more a nightmare.Paris joined Scientology's Sea Organization, signing its standard billion-year contract at age 14. Three years later, after her stepfather committed suicide and her mother denounced Scientology on French television, Paris was ordered to "disconnect" from her family.
Paris was taken in by the Church of Scientology at age 17 then transferred to the Freewinds a year later. The Village Voice reports that for several months she was punished with an assignment in the ship's engine room, where at one point she passed out from the noise and heat. During the first years of her imprisonment, an escort went with her whenever she left the ship but over time she was conditioned to believe there was no escape possible.
"When I first went there, I hated being there, and I wanted to leave," Paris told the Voice. "I knew that wasn't going to happen, so I began to accept that that was the way it was going to be," she says.
Paris compared the experience to that of of Jaycee Lee Dugard, held for 18 years in a California backyard and despite the ability to escape, felt resigned to being held captive.
"You're so resigned to it," said Paris. "I never had a bank account. You get 50 dollars a week. You don't have a passport. If you want to leave the ship, you have to go down the gangway, and there's a security guard there 24 hours a day."
Valeska's passport had been taken from her when she first boarded the ship, a procedure the church reportedly says was just routine.
"You were taught that Scientology was the only answer. You think you're doing the right thing," she says, adding that Sea Org members are constantly made to feel that they haven't done enough to "clear the planet" for Scientology's advancement. "They make you feel that you could always do more. I never really took any days off. That's your whole life, basically."
The Church of Scientology flat out denies the whole story saying
"Valeska Paris was a crew member aboard a ship.An exclusive report on the Australian Broadcasting Company program Lateline tells a different story:
All passports of crew members were held by the Port Captain in accordance with maritime regulations so they can be stamped in and out of ports as the ship sailed.
Valeska left the ship hundreds of times to go shopping, for outings with her husband on islands such as Aruba, St. Barts and Curaçao, as well as for numerous other reasons while aboard.
In 2001, she hosted six members of her husband's family. She participated in extended projects in the UK, US and Denmark. She certainly wasn't "forced" to be there.
She was also never forced to perform labor in the engine room."
UPDATE: Following publication of the story, the Church of Scientology reached out with the following comment:
Based on the above reports from Lateline and The Village Voice, we'll let you pick a side.The weblog posting concerning the Church of Scientology ("Cruise Ship Prison? Not so fast say Scientology captors", November 30) is a repetition of a false tabloid story from Australia. Valeska Paris Guider was serving as a crew member aboard the Freewinds religious retreat as a volunteer, adult religious worker. She was there of her own free will as part of her religious commitment to the Church of Scientology. The Freewinds is a passenger vessel with hundreds of people aboard. Ms. Guider's staff positions as a waitress, course instructor and staff counselor regularly placed her in contact with many parishioners and staff. She met and married her first husband there to whom she was married from 1998-2005 and who affirms her statements are false. She left the Freewinds hundreds of times to go shopping, for outings with her husband on islands such as St. Kitts, Aruba, St. Barts and Curaçao, as well as for numerous other reasons. She participated in extended trips to the UK, US and Denmark for which she passed through Immigration and Customs when entering and exiting these countries. Her claims are false.
The Freewinds, based in the Caribbean, is a religious retreat where Scientologists come for events, conventions, courses and spiritual counseling. The Freewinds is visited regularly by officials from the islands and countries it visits. It also serves as a training vessel and has become the regional authority on maritime security, training law enforcement and military personnel. A recent Meritorious Public Service Award from United States Homeland Security, awarded to the Freewinds by the United States Coast Guard describes the Freewinds as the "premier training platform throughout the Caribbean Basin." It further acknowledges continuous instruction of Caribbean personnel in what is described as the "highest traditions of the United States Coast Guard's core values-honor, respect and devotion to duty." The Freewinds also helps to promulgate the Church's humanitarian initiatives throughout the Caribbean region and has received numerous acknowledgements for its work in the fields of drug abuse education, human rights, morals education and literacy.
Filed under: Stories, United States, Cruises, Caribbean












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Raul Loeffler Nov 30th 2011 11:56PM
A pirate's dream come true ! Think it'll ever get to Mumbai ? Singapore ?
http://nutrasciencetrial.com
Mary Dec 1st 2011 8:17AM
Who can believe this church when they deny everything reported as a general rule? The Australians seem to be way ahead of the USA in attempting to do something about this longstanding problem with Scientology. Keeping people's passports is illegal and common in Scientology. Refusing to allow their more dedicated Sea Org members to leave the organization is reprehensible. Allowing members to speak up is violation of ones inate right to free speech. The internet is Scientology's worst enemy. Read up and one can see why.
Chris Dec 1st 2011 10:31AM
One thing I was thinking about Mary, was Paris a prisoner of the Church of Scientology or simply a cruise ship crew member?
We know that crew members on major cruise lines work for low wages, supplemented by passenger gratuities. They typically sign on for contracts that run from six to eight months, working every day. On board, their health care, meals, room and board are provided. Ongoing training in whatever programming the cruise line is focusing on occurs on a regular basis. In port, come crew members remain on duty to serve passengers who remained on the ship and to tend to other ship operations that require ongoing attention. Going ashore and coming back to the ship, we see a separate access area for crew members, manned by security guards at all times. Special areas on the ship are restricted as crew-only, mostly for safety reasons.
Its not too much of a stretch to believe that Paris was a typical cruise ship crew member, albeit an unhappy one, and that the Church of Scientology simply provided her a job that came along with much of what major cruise lines offer today.
JSKA Dec 1st 2011 1:10PM
Chris, Me thinks thou art a scientologist yourself...
Please be assured NO ONE out here in the public believes a single word that any scientologist-PR person ever says. We KNOW the people in charge of the scientologist 'church' are liars, they twist things to make it seem like they're innocent, and that Miscavage, as Ms. Paris says, truly is a psychopath.
We also understand that many 'church' members are disallusioned but stay in the organization for fear of losing their families, NOT because they still believe in what the 'church' espouses.
There are simply too many ex-scientologists that have given the same stories (about not being able to leave when they wanted, spying on church members, about Miscavage's well-known brutality, etc.) once they were able to leave the 'church'!! If the ones who leave were making up stories, why do they ALL say the same things?!
It will be a joyous day when this organization is exposed for the cult it is and it can no longer take advantage of people searching for the true higher power.
My main question today is, since scientologists don't believe in God or Jesus, WHY are they using a golden cross above the scientology sign???
P.S. I purposely did not capitalize scientology in this response.
Lawmantoo Dec 1st 2011 12:33PM
Scarry stuff. Historically, this pseudo-religious sect has made the news with bizzare stories of its rules and regulations. But, what would one expect from a creation of L. Ron Hubbard, the master of the insane. Only the insecure, loonies and movie personalities are naive enough to be taken in by this group. Now after posting this comment, I think I'll go check my mailbox for snakes.
wynsar Dec 2nd 2011 12:17AM
May I suggest a book: Strange Angel by George Pendle.....provides the back ground story....Hubbard was a con man......took ideas he learned in occult circles in LA in the 1940's ....mixed in science fiction and created his own universe.....the first ship he bought was with funds scammed from John Whiteside Parsons...fascinating story.....Scientology is a ponzi scheme
Chance Dec 2nd 2011 12:44PM
@Wynsar, I'm going to check out this book. Thanks.
Mary Dec 1st 2011 12:38PM
You are giving the church far to much credit to even consider that she was just a regulkar ship employee. Scientology does not hire people to work on the ship like a regular company hires employees. They recruit church members to join their Sea Organization, where they sign a one billion year contract, and then they are sent where ever the church decides. Paris was 14 years old when she signed her 'contract' and was assigned to the large center in Clearwater, FL USA called Flag Land Base. At age 19 she was sent to work at the Freewinds ship, which is not a general public commercial vessel. She was sent there because the church did not want her to have any contact with her mother who was suing the church. They did not want any influence in getting her to leave the church as the mother had. Being on the ship made it impossible for any contact between she and her mother.
She was escorted to the ship and once on the ship, her passport was transferred from the handler to the ship captain. If you want an example of someone who went through a similar situation of wanting to leave and being prevented from doing so, who resorted to escaping the ship ( corrorborated as well), see this article from the St Petersburg Times:
Man overboard: To leave Scientology, Don Jason had to jump off a ship
By Thomas C. Tobin, Times Staff Writer
In Print: Tuesday, November 3, 2009
http://www.tampabay.com/news/scientology/article1048124.ece
Julie Dec 1st 2011 5:33PM
There's more where that came from too.
exoticdoc2 Dec 1st 2011 1:51PM
It is nothing short of incredible that some people still cannot (read as, "choose not") recognize that scientology is a dangerous, destructive cult.
kerry wenrich Dec 2nd 2011 11:45AM
this gives love a bad name
SFF Dec 1st 2011 3:16PM
Just to note, the UN protocol on human trafficking:
'"Trafficking in persons" shall mean the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability... Exploitation shall include [...] forced labour or services... The consent of a victim of trafficking in persons to the intended exploitation set forth [above] shall be irrelevant where any of the means set forth [above] have been used.'
Just because they have documents saying she agreed to be there it doesn't mean that she wasn't a prisoner.
manroj1 Dec 1st 2011 4:01PM
Scientology is a cult and should be prosecuted and broken up under the Federal racketeering act. Of course one can make the same argument against any of the organized religions that extort money from their parishioners to feed their desires to be brainwashed until they are unable to think free and critically for themselves.
MPierce702 Dec 3rd 2011 9:19PM
Believe me, this isn't the first time people have put scientology and RICO in the same sentence. Unfortunately, things continue to stall thanks to the efforts of lobbyists and attorneys who put pressure on agencies like the DoJ and IRS to quash any investigations. Once lobbyists like Gerry Feffer (husband to scientology lawyer Monique Yingling), scientologist-collaborating Congressmen like Heath Shuler and politically-connected consultants like John Coale (who also happens to be the husband of Fox News personality Greta Van Susteren, also a scientologist) are dealt with, then perhaps progress can be made.
That's the precise reason why scientology is being allowed to get away with things like this. They were taken to court on human trafficking violations a year or so ago by former members Marc and Claire Headley, and the judge in the case (Dale Fischer) dismissed all claims due to scientology's claim that it fell under the "ministerial exception"- a loophole that is currently before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Only once we can get the weeds out of the garden can we focus on truly getting justice for people like Valeska and all the others who are in the same position she was in, only without the way out. And while we're at it, it might be worth having a little chat with the US Coast Guard and validating these claims that scientology is making. Considering the Freewinds doesn't even sail in American waters, something tells me invoking the name (and I'm betting false endorsement) of a federal agency is going to be frowned upon.
Mary Dec 1st 2011 6:15PM
@JSKA, I think it's wrong to say you think the author Chris Owen is a scientologist just because he's questioning Paris' accusations about the Scientology Sea Org Freewinds employment practices. Its his job to report both sides and he did. That he questions what happened is probably a natural reaction since Chris writes about the cruise travel industry. I imagine it hard to believe that the Freewinds has been able to get away with these things because the industry itself is so accommodating to customers and regulated as a rule.
Perhaps he did not know that the Freewinds is really not a commercial 'cruise ship' but a private, ship that belongs to scientology's Sea Org pseudo navy, catering to scientologist only for delivery of it's top super sekret level OT VIII training. There is the occasional bringing on for visit some local townspeople for PR purposes but nonmember access to the ship is limited One can read about th Freewinds here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freewinds.
There is a another Chris Owen associated with Scientology, but he's a critic from the UK and a British historian who studied Scientology extensively. He contributed immensely to the wealth of information on the internet. One can read this archive of his independent research and documentation on Scientology
here http://www.solitarytrees.net/cowen/index.htm
Dean Fox Dec 1st 2011 6:46PM
It's also common for church of scientologist Office of Special Affairs, OSA, to use such names. We don't know if Chris Owens here is Chris Owens the critic.
One thing is for certain the church of scientology has a well documented history that this story is in line with.
The fact is members of the church of scientology believe the organisations' view point because they are conditioned to do so.
There are however many independent scientologists who believe in the ideals of helping to improve oneself and helping others that were used by the organisation to sell them on scientology are what L Ron Hubbard intended. They all see the church of scientology as abussive and corrupt, being only interested in money as well as being vindictive and obsessed with destroying critics. This wouldn't be the case if the organisation was not worthy of such criticism.
Dean Fox Dec 1st 2011 6:56PM
And anyway the comment was only tagged Chris, so reallly you're thhe only one saying it's Chris Owen. Me thinks you and Chris made a boo boo. OSA typical screw up.
Mary Dec 1st 2011 9:46PM
@ Dean Fox, you failed to look at the name of the author of the article because his name is Chris Owen and if you click his name, you can see the many articles he's written, primarily related to cruise ship and other forms of travel. That Chris Owen replied to my earlier comment as 'Chris".
I have seen your name lately posting comments on article that have come out about Scientology and I appreciate you taking a stand to speak up about the things you know and have experienced with the cult. I am a former longtime scientologist and have been writing about scientology and its front groups like Narconon and commenting on articles for quite a few years now years. I am also a volunteer advocate for victims of Narconon's internet and telephone deceptive trade practices and fraud scam. One of the things I have seen at the forums is the use of calling someone OSA or "a scientologist' because the person posted something that is in agreeement to some degree with something a ex member or critic would usually not agree with. Usually critic jump on that poster for not providing definative proof because there has been a history of such unfounded and often mean spirited name calling within the community. To call someone OSA or " you're a scientologist" when the person is most likely not is foolish unproductive.
After losing our rights to critical thinking, free thought and free speech as scientologists, I guess it takes time to learn how to respect the rights of others to have them as we learn to live having regained our rights back. Try to keep the author's right to question things he's not familiar with and use it as an opportunity to educate.
Thanks for helping by commenting on articles because people need to know the truth when propaganda is being told by the church.
JSKA Dec 2nd 2011 12:36PM
@Mary, truthfully it never occurred to me the author 'Chris' and the poster 'Chris' might be the same person. And I surely didn't mean to insult ex-scientologists by saying 'you must be a scientologist yourself.' Thank you for enlightening us and I will be careful not to say this in the future. :)
Honestly, my gut reaction was 'how can this person doubt an ex-scientologist?' because (at least to me) it seems like -everyone- now knows that the 'church' really does do this type of thing, and when caught it automatically denies and then twists the story to make it seem like a misunderstanding.
The thought that Chris entertained even a drop of disbelief in Ms. Paris' story was simply beyond my comprehension.
Pre-1990s or even pre-internet, the public (including myself) would have to be pardoned for questioning the veracity of her kidnapping story. But today, with so many ex-scientologists coming out and exposing the organization for what it does (and all the similar abuse stories within a few clicks reach of us), I thought people's first reaction is to believe the victim and automatically dismiss the 'church's' claim of, "They're lying. Let us tell you what really happened..."
At least that is my first reaction when I read anything about scientology.
On another note, since you said you were an ex-scientologist, may I ask about your religious leanings now? Or did your experience affect you so much that you don't even think about religion anymore?
Mary Dec 2nd 2011 10:29PM
@JSKA, thanks for your reply. I fully understand what you mean and I'm glad my comment was informative.
I was a lapsed Catholic when I joined Scientology. When I left Scientology 18 or so years after joining, I found myself wondering what it was I studied as a child and what my beliefs really were. I found I knew little of Catholisiam and Christianlity in general so I set out to explore what I was supposed to have learned as a child. I knew I believed in God because it was that belief that I called upon when I was going through troubled times trying to leave the cult and it aided me greatly considering I was reallynot as educated on religion as I once thought but I had faith in God that and that eventually lead me to becoming a nondenominal Christian.
Most exscientologists tend to avoid conventional religions or seek more spiritual aid from the eastern religions or philosophies, if they seek anything at all. Many are agnostic. For me, studying Christianity was very helpful, primarily because I never knew what was being said in church as a child, as all things were in Latin at that time. I only had the personal spiritual experiences I had as a child to go by when I was there. I never looked at Scientology as my religion because when I joined it was considered and taught as a religious philosophy and in my mind that is how I viewed it.
The thing is, I lost all desire for God when I became a scientologist so in trying to leave, and having to do so quietly and secretly, all I has was the God of my childhood to call upon to help me for fear of retrubution by the cult. I don't claim to know much about Christianity but I know I am I could never be a Catholic and I know I could never be a part of organized religion ever again. I think that organized religion is the issue with many exmembers. No one wants to be duped ever again but faith is belief in something unseen but known and for me, Christianity allows me to believe in God and not be subject to anyone but Him, who gives me power of choice. I hope this makes sense to you :)