Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-13-2011 @ 12:19PM
camille said...
I am 100% with Ms. Miller on the subject of food elitism and the nail-on-chalkboardness of the word "foodie," but I feel the choice of photos to illustrate the piece is more than questionable--the child in particular. Who on earth thought it was a good idea to flaunt this dramatically undernourished baby next to what is, in essence, a discussion about a (generally) wealthy country that has the luxury of arguing about food snobism? Am I the only one who feels it is completely inappropriate?
Reply
10-13-2011 @ 12:34PM
Jodi said...
I agree with you completely - that's what stands out as well, and what ought to stand out is the tone and arguments of the piece, which were great. I guess the Gadling editors agree as the photo has been removed! But I wanted to second your note either way.