Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Dropping the F-bomb: why "foodie" needs to go away
Life used to be so easy. You ate to live. Then, man discovered fire and realized mastodon tastes a lot better with a nice sear on it. Around 500,000 years later, Homo foodieus evolved, and now it's impossible to go out to eat without camera flashes going off at the tables around you.
Mercifully, there's a Foodie Backlash taking root in America, and I feel the time is ripe (Did you see how I tossed two food puns into that sentence? Annoying, isn't it?) to go public with my loathing for this odious word and the obnoxious behavior that too often goes with it.
I realize I'm setting myself up here. I'm a food journalist. Don't I perpetuate all of this silliness, getting readers in a lather over the Next Big Food Thing? Don't I eat at nice restaurants and drink expensive wine? Well, yes. And, no (and to that latter hypothetical question, less often that you'd think in this economy).
I like to think that through (most of) my work, I promote importance of understanding where food comes from, and urging localized food security. I'm concerned about protecting the environment, public health, and genetic diversity in plants and livestock; conserving natural resources, and finding more humane ways to raise and slaughter livestock.
Does that make me the culinary equivalent of Mother Theresa, or absolve me of my written transgressions that are less pure in culinary intent? Hell no; I can be a hedonist, too. But I'm trying to make a point here. I realize that my bordering-on-obsessive hatred of "foodie" is really about the culture it's perpetuating. That said, the word itself is infantile, idiotic, and meaningless, and makes me want to poke my eyes out with a larding needle. Can't people just say they love food?
My biggest issue with foodie as a concept is that it's detrimental to the remarkable, burgeoning food culture we've finally achieved in the United States. In a mere 100 years, we went from agrarian society to culinary wasteland to possessing identifiable food regions. We established a world-class artisan food, sustainable agriculture, and fine dining scene in certain parts of the country.
What went wrong? We paid $200 (for a bottle of estate olive oil), and instead of passing "Go," we became a cult of food elitists. It's the antithesis of why many of us got into the food business in the first place. Yes, care about what you eat, but food shouldn't have a sense of entitlement attached to it.
In a perfect world, everyone should have access to fresh, wholesome, local, delicious food, especially children. Thanks to the good work of organizations like the Chez Panisse Foundation and the increasing number of school lunch programs, community gardens, and other food security initiatives across the country, this isn't an impossible goal for Americans to achieve, nor is tackling our obesity epidemic in a one-two punch.
I'm not saying it's wrong to spend disposable income, if you have it, on costly ingredients or dining out. But the fetishizing of food, the pissing contest that is the hallmark of the archetypal foodie is what I cannot abide. This is what's at the heart of foodieism; the need to belong to a special club, with a language all its own. In our status-obsessed society, we need to separate ourselves from the plebes who think that the Olive Garden is serving "Italian" food.
Eating well (not necessarily synonymous with eating "expensively") is one of the greatest pleasures in life, and cooking for other people and joining them at the table sustains us in ways that go beyond filling our stomachs. Every food lover (see? doesn't sound so bad, does it?) has a deep, fundamental reason for why they're so moved by the act of eating.

For me, it's the cultural aspects of food, its intrinsic relationship to travel, as well as the people who grow, forage, raise, catch, and make food on a small, sustainable scale. These are things that I was fortunate enough to experience in childhood, and they made an indelible impression on me, as well as fostered my culinary career. Good food--be it a ripe peach, a great street taco, or a lavish, multi-course meal--brings me joy. For what it's worth, however, my parents aren't "food people." I grew up on a ranch, but I also ate a lot of frozen vegetables and TV dinners, because my mom had two kids to raise, dislikes cooking, and for her, the '70's with its advent of guiltless convenience foods was a godsend.
There's also the bad manners perpetuated by foodie culture. On what planet is it okay to "just pop into the kitchen" during a packed dinner service to talk to the chef...especially when s/he's a total stranger? Yet my boyfriend and I witnessed this scenario, while dining at a certain famous restaurant.
After three hours of listening to the ten-top beside us discourse on the merits of Brittany sea salt purchased at the source versus approximately 12 other kinds of hand-harvested salt, we were ready to clobber them. Look, if you want to spend your money on that shit and then have a debate about it, that's your perogative. Just don't hold a small, intimate restaurant as captive audience. Few things are more deadly boring than foodies in a feeding frenzy.
We watched their lengthy progression of courses congeal and grow cold as they scurried around the table snapping food porn. At meal's end, the ringleader hopped up and made her foray into the kitchen. And, because it was a small, intimate restaurant and my boyfriend and I were seated nearby, we heard the following words come out of the mouth of the extremely irate sous chef who blocked her path: "Lady, we're in the middle of fucking service. Get the hell out of here!"
Cue applause meter.

Foodies should also remember that while home cooking, traveling, and dining out most certainly give you an education about food, they don't, in most cases, make you an expert. Yelp serves a purpose, to be sure, but it's often a means of settling a score or self-promoting. Or, in the case of food blog reviews written by foodies (as opposed to, say, people with actual journalism and culinary credentials), a way to say, "I'm a food writer too!" One food blogger I stumbled across while researching this story had written on a recent post, "I think [foodie] is a very serious title. It's like calling yourself a writer or an artist. It means you have to have the knowledge, talent and experience to back it up."
Um, please get over yourself. Knowing about food, winning a Pulitzer, being the greatest chef on earth...at the end of the day, it's just effing food. Not the cure for cancer or achieving world peace.
I think esteemed food writer and author Amanda Hesser said it best when she was quoted in a Chicago Tribune article last year: "Having more people interested in good food is never a bad thing," she said, but what she can't abide is eating dinner with people who "only want to talk about food and every place where they ate, like, doughnuts or something, and where the best doughnuts are secretly found. Knowing a lot about food culture is a good thing. That cataloguing of food experience is becoming tiresome. I'm pro-food experts. I'm just not so sure I want to have dinner with them or have them judge me on the coffee I drink."
Amen.
[Photo credits: mushroom cloud, Flickr user Juampe López, poster, Flicker user Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com]
Filed under: Activism, Arts and Culture, History, Learning, Food and Drink, North America, United States, Ecotourism, Consumer Activism












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
tizzmine Oct 14th 2011 12:11AM
foodie......watch out if you comment wrong you will be censored by a left wing liberal
so only certain minority wantto be groups can say things....no being civil and actually controversial
camille Oct 13th 2011 12:19PM
I am 100% with Ms. Miller on the subject of food elitism and the nail-on-chalkboardness of the word "foodie," but I feel the choice of photos to illustrate the piece is more than questionable--the child in particular. Who on earth thought it was a good idea to flaunt this dramatically undernourished baby next to what is, in essence, a discussion about a (generally) wealthy country that has the luxury of arguing about food snobism? Am I the only one who feels it is completely inappropriate?
Jodi Oct 13th 2011 12:34PM
I agree with you completely - that's what stands out as well, and what ought to stand out is the tone and arguments of the piece, which were great. I guess the Gadling editors agree as the photo has been removed! But I wanted to second your note either way.
Laurel Oct 13th 2011 12:40PM
Hi readers,
Just to clear things up, I chose the photo of the malnourished baby to make a point (it seems I semi-succeeded). Isn't it both preposterous and sad that "foodie" culture ignores the fact that few other countries in the world have the privileges we have here in the U.S. with regard to eating? It's one of my main objections to "foodiesm," as I mention briefly in the piece.
It was a disturbing image (and it wasn't my choice to remove it, but I defer to my editors' judgement), but I hope that even without it, it makes us all realize that we're fortunate to have the choices we do when it's time to nourish ourselves.
Thanks for reading, and I appreciate the feedback.
Best,
Laurel
camille Oct 13th 2011 1:27PM
I understand what you're saying, thank you for your response.
My feeling is that the shock value of such images is best kept for instances when we're actually discussing malnourishment, and what can be done to prevent or alleviate it.
My concern is that using them "in passing," to punctuate articles about other topics, will only dull their effect and make them less powerful when there is a need to make the problem disturbingly real enough that readers feel moved to donate to, or volunteer with, NGO's who are actively doing something about it.
Jodi Oct 13th 2011 1:24PM
Hi Laurel. I really enjoyed the post and as someone who is obsessed with food and that obsession fuels most of my travels (as a connector, as a learning experience, as an understanding of food safety and how relevant it is to all of us, etc), I really dislike the term foodie. I remember going to a conference and there was a food track where people said things like "foraging for food is SO trendy in ___ city right now. Foodies there love foraging" And I had just come back from Southeast Asia and it was a shock to the system to see this frothing at the mouth for the 'trend' without seeing the macro picture (or the irony).
While I understand why you chose the photo, I think the visceral reaction to it is that it's linkbait of a different sort, which does you a big injustice because it was a well-written and enjoyable post.
Laurel Oct 13th 2011 1:42PM
Hi Camille and Jodi,
Thanks so much for sharing your perspectives--this is why constructive comments rather than flaming are so valuable. In reading both of your responses, I agree with you completely, and I appreciate your providing me with your perspectives.
My original goal was to capture readers' attention, in order to draw them to the bigger picture (elitism/lack of food justice), but now that you point it out, it does diminish the topic at hand as well as exploit a larger, much more serious issue.
Please, other readers: with regard to commenting on any site, regardless of topic, there's so much journalists can learn from you and vice versa when even negative feedback is phrased in a non-confrontational, constructive way. I just want to thank these two ladies for helping me to be a better writer, as well as making my day with their insights. Thanks, and look forward to hearing from you in future posts!
Best,
Laurel
camille Oct 13th 2011 2:20PM
Thank you, Laurel, for such a gracious reaction. I do appreciate a constructive dialogue, and also wish it could be had more often in the online world. All the best to you and Jodi!
Mike Sanders Oct 13th 2011 2:18PM
Dear Laurel,
I'm going to say this as nicely as I can... The reference to, "Around 500,000 years later, Homo foodieus evolved,,," is very incorrect. The earth is just under 6,000 years old and man was created, not evolved. I realize that you'll think me to be a creten, although that doesn't really trouble me. My credentials go back to 1969, when I became the youngest member of the St. Louis Astronomical Society, ever. I am also a Christian and I believe what's written in the Holy Bible. I spent considerable time and energy researching escatology, the study of the end times. Yes, our planet won't be around in it's current form, for very much longer. Even an atheist can see the convergence of forces, in Middle East. Don't be a worshipper of "IF," as if isn't much help, when it's time to face God. You can start by accepting the fact of God's existance, then begin reading the Holy Bible. I think that you'd like the NIV, version (New Interantional Version). It's the greatest adventure you'll ever take and you'll learn that God is very real, very forgiving and even has a sense of humor! Good fortune (you don't need luck, since you are a gifted writer) and may you survive the upheaval at AOL. AOL/Huffington Post isn't nearly as good as AOL once was, buy you in particular have a chance of changing that! Keep on writing and if you get a chance to freelance and associate your name with other journals, please do so. You are bigger than AOL, but I wouldn't quit... I mean, we all have to pay the bills. Trust in God, and see how much bigger and better our world is, when you know it's Creator.
Best wishes,
Michael Sanders
Lauren Oct 13th 2011 3:33PM
WHOA!!!! Is this dude for real?!
MIke Sanders Oct 13th 2011 9:16PM
I am just as real as you are, Lauren.
Rodosee Oct 13th 2011 11:10PM
While I really enjoyed and agreed with much of this article (wary of the 'foodie' tag myself), I think this statement -- "foodies (as opposed to, say, people with actual journalism and culinary credentials)" -- sets up a false dichotomy as well as flagging the same sort of "me-expert-too" mentality.
I say this as a journalist myself, and I write about food too, in a personal as well as professional capacity: I think all three sets of people in your statement actually serve different, and not necessarily better/lesser functions. The 'foodie' or 'amateur blogger/writer', at his/her best, provides a more mainstream or naive perspective, which can be critical for professionals to understand and appreciate in the interest of their own success! The journalist investigates, collects, and to some extent applies judgement and direction --- it is a bridging and validating function. Professionals, also a 'net' term, vary --- some provide expert insights into the growing/raising or preparation of food; others on the way the socioeconomics of food work; some are simply artisans (may or may not knowledgeable of in areas not of the hands-on variety). I don't think journalists can be allied with food professionals as 'experts'. Nor are all food professionals 'experts' on food in a general way. And having a day job or a degree in food does not necessarily mean you are more knowledgeable or a better job than the autodidactic amateur!
HannahDJackson Oct 18th 2011 9:48AM
Learn how to cook is not easy,specially if you are not ready for it,thank you for sharing!
Roberta Oct 19th 2011 3:11AM
My husband and I really enjoyed this article. Made us laugh, especially to see our own snobbish ways (okay I do silently judge people who think Olive Garden serves the best Italian food, you got me). We had no idea the movement was getting to the level of who has the best car, house, and sea salt. We unfortunately live an hour away from great food and we are still hoping the food movement will grow. Outside booming cities some of us rural folks are salivating for a good restaurant experience to open near us so we can eat good food in our own neighborhoods. So why you shun this growing practice where it has swung to an extreme. The movement still needs to grow in other areas so we can eat well outside our own homes. Viva the food revolution even if we have to put up with a few food extremists. Thank you for your hilarious article. We loved it and it made our day.
Hoagy Oct 27th 2011 7:20PM
You should check out the brief ebook "How to Talk to a Food Freak". Fun and interesting.....
http://www.amazon.com/How-Talk-Food-Freak-ebook/dp/B005Z8IX0Q/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1319740415&sr=1-1
Dg Nov 3rd 2011 10:22PM
Bless you.
I was once lambasted by a local celebrity for daring to criticize a farm-to-table event by observing that a $150 per person dinner served to 40 people ready to pay for sitting at a community table in a field had nothing to do with bringing farm food to the masses. Considering that we live in a country where a shockingly high percentage of us are challenged by simply getting enough food, this kind of preening is simply shameful.