Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Hungary introduces "fat tax" on unhealthy foods
A new bill found it's way onto the political docket in Hungary earlier this week, that if passed would create the world's first "fat tax." The Eastern European country's parliament will now consider the bill, which would raise the price of foods that are deemed as unhealthy. Proceeds from the new law would then be used to cover the rising costs of state-funded health care.When the bill was originally drafted a few months back, it was immediately dubbed as "the hamburger tax," but later the Hungarian government decided that fast food restaurants would not be subject to the new tax. Instead, they've chosen to levy the tariff on items found in grocery and convenience stores that are deemed to have too much salt, sugar, or fat. If the law goes into effect, those items would go up in price by 3.7 eurocents or roughly 5¢. There will also be a 10% increase in the price of liquor and soft drinks as well.
The bill will be debated by the Hungarian Parliament later this summer, but is expected to easily pass into law, making the country the first to actually institute higher fees on unhealthy foods. It is estimated that the law would generate as much as 111 million Euros or approximately $157.6 million. Those funds that are sorely needed to help keep Hungary's cash-strapped health care system afloat.
What are your thoughts on this so-called fat tax? Would you pay a little more for foods you love that might be deemed as unhealthy? Is this any different than the so called "sin tax" on cigarettes or alcohol?
Filed under: Arts and Culture, Learning, Food and Drink, Europe, Hungary, News










Reader Comments (Page 3 of 5)
John Howell Jul 16th 2011 5:36PM
The answer is easy. Don't pay it. If your money is taken from you, treat it as theft and act accordingly.
sara Jul 16th 2011 5:44PM
have u ever noticed that the unhealthy food is always cheaper then the healthy. look at a burger could be 99 cents in america while a pack of celery sticks is 1.50. if u wanted to make a healthy hamberger at home u would need to buy all the ingredients to make the burger. the buns and the burger. while if u go to fast food u get it all and topping for 99 cents. in the state america is in its no wonder people eat at fast foods all the time cause for 10 dollars you can feed ur whole family. if they would just make healthy food cheaper and unhealthy more expensive it would make it easier on consumers to decide on what to buy
Allan Jul 16th 2011 5:59PM
Have they got a Big Eared Pea Brain Muslim Kenyan over there running things too?
Angiebaby Jul 16th 2011 6:29PM
I don't travel any more. I can't afford to buy two seats for my huge arse, I'll be stuck with the additional "fat taxes" in Hungary, New York and all over the world, and there is nothing left I want to see or do. It's just as well. By the by, if one stays at the New York, New York in Las Vegas, do they have to pay the extra fat taxes on sodas & such like in the real New York, New York?
cross Jul 16th 2011 6:48PM
SIMPLE, dont eat the crap food that will be taxed and you will feel better, do better, and look better
sorry i dont see the harm where is the down side
and lets face it the goverment is, was and always be in control.
and healthcare costs will go down again dont see the harm
Sandra Jul 16th 2011 9:37PM
Cross, the harm and the down side is that the government shouldn't be in control of what we eat, healthy foods or not. It controls too much as it is.
Eric Jul 16th 2011 6:55PM
First cigarettes, now food, whats next the air I breathe or they gonna hit me up every time I have to piss
sandy Jul 16th 2011 6:55PM
My question is, where does "Big Brother" government intervention stop? If they are going to tax foods deemed unhealthy (and how many lobbyists will it take to decide which foods these are?), then they certainly need to tax all video games and video game makers, because they lead to children being inactive and physically unfit. And also all schools that do not allow children adequate recess...and any parent that does not make sure that his or her children get the recommended number of hours of sleep every night, and people who make stiletto heels, because we all know that they are very bad for people's feet and posture, leading to back problems, etc. And how about those who make or sell football equipment...it leads to untold injuries (and even some deaths). When will people get it through their heads that the answer is NEVER more government?!
mizbizc Jul 16th 2011 6:59PM
In my opinion, for something like this to work, you would need to tax the manufacturer for introducing unhealthy items to the marketplace and then add the purchase tax to the consumer's price. As long as the price of healthier foods doesn't increase at the same rate, the manufacturers will eventually come up better alternatives and consumers will think twice about what they are buying with their money. I certainly couldn't see myself spending $3 soda when I could have water for $1.50.
Katy Jul 16th 2011 7:00PM
mmmmmm.... a 'fat tax' on unhealthy foods? Sure, great idea! How about we put an 'ugly' tax on all cosmetics, since cosmetics might improve the appearance of someone that another person might consider ugly? Wait, what about a 'promiscuity' tax on all the people who have had sex, got pregnant, and can't afford the child, so the rest of us are providing the daycare, or job training, or the food and diapers and on and on AND they get a break on their taxes as well!Seems to me that we are all paying a great deal for the mistakes and needs of others when a great deal of it could have been avoided. Heck, let's tax everyone for everything! Oh wait, we already do! We have become a nation of takers and givers.... and unfortunately, the givers have just about given all they can, with the exception of big business, that takes and then gives back broken promises. Try taking that to the bank or grocery store!
ARod Jul 16th 2011 7:11PM
Healthcare has to be paid for somehow. If it only amounts to .05 cents per item it is nothing. People stock up on these items when they are on sale anyway. The tax is not meant to discourage people from eating foods that are bad for them. It is meant to capitalize on the fact that these foods are popular and make the consumers foot the bill for the cardiac care they will need in the future.
I think it is better to have a tax via consumers than directly from one's check. If you dont like the tax dont purchase the food. Either way its a win win for the govt. I think more of that should happen in the States.
jeff Aug 2nd 2011 5:40PM
If there is one thing that really irks me it is a reformed alcoholic,drug user or smoker who think that they know better then anyone else because they've "been there".I wish that they would remember how it felt when they were preached to when they had their habit.and be more considerate of others before they open their mouth.
Bassmeant Jul 16th 2011 7:16PM
Given the chance i would vote yes to this. As an exsmoker, I have seen the frontlines of how political correctness has run amok. So now its time to pay it forward. I've quit smoking. I find morbid obesity to be not only a drain on society but its also embarassing to think world sees Americans as "a bunch of overweight cowboys". Let's keep the hats and ditch the weight, shall we? Yes to "fat taxes" on junk food. Peace
M.A. Korman Jul 16th 2011 11:47PM
If you are so embarrassed by America's image then it is too bad you didn't live in Germany when Hitler was in control. You would have been very happy there when he insisted everyone should look a certain way and look how well that turned out.
Jozef Jul 16th 2011 7:30PM
As an fan of Hungarian cuisine and one who dabbles in Hungarian cooking, I can assure the uninitiated readers that almost all of Hungarian cooking is unhealthy; and so good!!!
Marie Jul 16th 2011 7:40PM
Um, have any of you *been* to a grocery store recently? You can't *find* healthy food! Tax the big chain fastfood restaurants and not the people paying $8.99 per pound with most of those pounds water weight. I tried to make a steak. Guess what? It *boiled* in the pan fromj excess water they squeezed in to get more money. And define "unhealthy". Do you know how much sodium is in most of the things we eat? And I'm not talking Hamburger Helper here; I'm talking about the supposedly "good for you" foods. So basically, the Food and Drug Administration be taking us extra for *everything* in the grocery store, tax money that would line already wealthy pockets.
Yatesy Jul 16th 2011 7:53PM
Think about it. If you eat well, don't drink and don't smoke you will probably live longer. As you grow older you will begin to need health care and retirement benefits for a really long time. The country saves money if people die early. Most older people have soaked up a lot of social security and huge health care bills before the die.
Healthy habits are good but don't try to tell people that they save the country money!
tabitha125 Jul 16th 2011 9:28PM
They should make it to where everyone thats on food stamps cant buy just food and only health foods. If they want junk food they can pay cash for it
don Jul 16th 2011 7:41PM
Big brother is here. Each step you agree to leads to the next step got it?
Rollando Jul 16th 2011 8:26PM
No different from the sin tax. However, they need to raise money. I would rather pay a little more on junk foods than have tax increases on income and properties. At least you can eliminate the junk food from your diet.