Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-14-2011 @ 1:54AM
Eugenio said...
The interpretation of these pictures is incorrect: this typology of portrait is purely roman. In Pompei and in Rome too, are conserved a few of these portraits and it can to follow their evolution in time. This typology, in roman world and in Italy first, begun before the egyptians portraits that you've show here.
Reply
6-14-2011 @ 6:04AM
Sean McLachlan said...
"Purely Roman"? No. While you are correct that panel painting started earlier than the mummy portraits, as I said in my article, it was both a Greek and Roman art. The Fayum portraits started during the Ptolemaic (Graeco-Egyptian) rule and in a place where many Greeks and mixed Graeco-Egyptians lived. Plus in the eastern Mediterranean at this time many of the artisans and craftsmen were Greek. In the cosmopolitan world of the eastern Mediterranean, with its constant interaction between cultures, it's hard to say anything is "purely" from one civilization.
7-24-2011 @ 9:24PM
taaruoort said...
Sorry, but maybe I was not clear: The tradition of portraits are certainly
commune to ancient mediterranean civilisations, but the particular kind of
portraits that you've show in the article, its style, and - if I remember right
- its times, are "purely" roman. I invite you to watching the roman portraits
of Pompei and Rome, from the same period, and do a comparison. Anyhow, I know the portraits showed in the article; those appear in the titles of roman
history of art.