Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Smithsonian in National Latino Musuem controversy
The museum is planned for the National Mall, shown here in this image courtesy Andrew Bossi, and would complete a set of museums that include the National Museum of the American Indian and the National Museum of African American History and Culture. The latter museum is due to open in 2015. While a museum to the contributions of Latinos to American history and culture makes sense, it's meeting opposition in Congress over funding and the concept itself.
Jim Moran (D-VA) says he doesn't want each minority group going to their own museum and skipping the others. This reasoning would hold water if the other museums hadn't been established already, but it seems a bit late in the day to be bringing forth this argument now.
The current financial crisis is a more persuasive argument against a new museum. The National Museum of African American History and Culture sported a $500 million price tag. Half of that was paid for with Federal dollars, something that's not going to go over well in the current Congress. There's also talk of a national woman's museum, but that's likely to face the same hurdles as the Latino Museum.
Latinos are the largest minority group in the United States and have been here since well before the country was founded. Many modern states, such as Florida, Arizona, even Missouri, were Spanish colonies before they became U.S. states.
Do you think there should be a National Museum of the American Latino? Should it be paid for with tax dollars? Tell us what you think in the comments section!