Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-22-2011 @ 4:02AM
Russell said...
Had the passenger specified vegetarian diet, no meat, or whatever, that is what would have been provided. Since she did not specify it, and the flight did not have a non-meat dish, the passenger should have either declined the meal or requested (and the request should have been honored by the airline without cost increase, a second meal. Both of which she could have eaten around the offending piece of food. In no case should she have thrown the meal at the FA. She should have brought it to the FA's attention, requested a non-meat entre or two entre's in which she just eat around the meat. The airline is obligated to provide for specific dietary meals or restrictions. This is determined before the flight. Many people have specific alergies to certain foods, others worsen medical conditions if they eat a meal that contains high levels of sodium, same wiith peanuts and peanut products, or milk, or red meats. These situations needs to made known to the flight team prior to the flight so they can bring those specific items on board the flight and then are reserved specifically for them.
Reply