Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-11-2011 @ 2:34PM
Malaycobra said...
The static discharges look cool, but do they cause any problems with the plane avionics?
If not, I fail to see why my ebook needs to be off under 10,000 feet.
I did wonder if it was so that I would pay attention to the safety messages and not have a potential projectile flying around in case of trouble. Then I see the guy next to me reading a hardcover book and I can't seem to figure it out.
Reply
3-16-2011 @ 9:10PM
PAUL said...
Some (nowadays most) electronic devices have some sort of communication abilities that do actually interfere with the planes avionics and radios. So instead of announcing: "Please turn off Computers, phones, ipods, ipads, ect. But kindles, nooks, ect. are permissible." they just say to turn off all devices for simplicity.
3-14-2011 @ 8:55PM
Digi said...
What's the point? I mean you REALLY need that ebook so friggin badly you prefer the maybe over the if? I mean really are you so self diluted that you must absolutely have to have your little electronic gadget on? Give me a break and get over yourself. It's a POTENTIAL SAFETY HAZARD. ENOUGH SAID. NO ONE owes you a reason why. YOU ARE ON A PLANE WITH OTHER PEOPLE, NOT JUST YOUR PRECIOUS SELF. So next time, leave your gadgets in your bag until you are told it is alright and shut the hell up.
3-14-2011 @ 9:20PM
Malaycobra said...
Lay off the caffeine, get over yourself and take a Xanax.
I asked a perfectly reasonable question.
Douche.
3-14-2011 @ 9:33PM
Kent Wien said...
Great question, actually.
Right now these devices are prohibited. But if an airline wanted to spend a ton of money, they could certify with the FAA that, say, the Kindle 2 is safe to use. But they'd have to go through the whole process again when the next version comes out.
After going through that effort, any other airline can then piggyback on the certification work that the first airline did, eliminating any competitive advantage they might have in touting the airline as being "Kindle friendly."
Airlines just aren't willing to do that. Maybe an aircraft manufacturer could pull it off, and extend the list of permissible devices with the FAA.
There's a good study done on the subject if you really want to understand what can be done to eliminate some of the interference concerns.
PDF Link to study: http://andreconsulting.com/Walen_Presentation.pdf
3-14-2011 @ 10:03PM
Malaycobra said...
Thanks Kent.
I get the certification thing. Would be nice if electronics were allowed on again during those 2 hr 59 second ground holds ;-)
Now how about those static discharges? Do they cause any trouble with your instruments?
3-14-2011 @ 10:10PM
Kent Wien said...
I've never seen any issues with our instruments during the static or "St. Elmo's fire."
During any prolonged delay, hopefully the crew is able to park the airplane, turn the seatbelt sign off and allow electronic devices. Not to mention shut down both engines.
Often times you're in a line of traffic that's moving very slowly. It becomes more difficult to allow bags out and people to get up at that point.
3-14-2011 @ 10:14PM
Malaycobra said...
Yeah, I remember the bad old days. 6 hours on the tarmac a JFK, with the pilot stopping now and then and offering bathroom breaks.
We eventually returned to the terminal, where everyone was allowed off to get food etc.
Of course, half the passengers never noticed what gate we went to, so we had another 2 hour wait while everyone was rounded up.
The last family got quite a reception when they sheepishly stepped aboard the plane.