Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Cockpit Chronicles: Six surreal sights seen by pilots
I've said it before; the office view from the pointy-end of an airliner is something that can only be matched by an astronaut's view.But that's not to say we don't get to see a few celestial sights of our own. No, I'm not going to touch on the rumored UFO sightings by pilots, although I promise I'll keep my camera ready, just in case. I'm talking about the stunning sights, both man-made and natural that we can witness if we take the time to look for them.
Here are examples of six 'out of this world' sights as seen from the cockpit:
1) Rocket plumes and Shuttle launches:
On March 5th, while coming back to Boston from Santo Domingo, we saw the rocket plume of the secretive X-37B project. Even though it launched from Orlando, which was at least 600 miles away, we knew right away what it was. The spiraling exhaust left circles in the sky.
We knew to look for this as a possibility as our flight was dispatched with extra fuel, in case we needed to be re-routed well away from the launch area which was noted at the bottom of our flight plan.
The first sign of the rocket appeared as a trail of exhaust that began to swing off into a contorted lasso. The new moon, less than 24 hours old, presented itself in just the right spot amongst the rocket blast. Of course I had to pull out the camera.
Gallery: X-37B Rocket Launch as seen from an airliner
Passengers can get lucky as well, as seen in this video that caught the ascent of the Space Shuttle Discovery:
2) Noctilucent Clouds
Another rare natural event, which some speculate is actually enhanced by rocket and shuttle exhaust plumes, are noctilucent clouds.
The conditions have to be just right in order to witness these clouds that live at 300,000 feet, (80 to 85 kilometers) an altitude which seems impossible, considering the lack of atmosphere, for a cloud to exist.
They're most commonly seen during a two month period that straddles the summer solstice. Furthermore, most sightings occur between 50 and 70 degrees latitude; perfect if you live north of New York, Madrid or Beijing and south of Barrow, Alaska.
Finally, as if to make it as difficult as possible for anyone to catch sight of these clouds, they're only visible for an hour or two before sunrise or for a while after sunset. The reflecting sun illuminates the clouds from below, lighting them up in the dark sky.
I flew across the Atlantic at night, during the perfect time to witness these clouds, for eight years before finally sighting them. Two weeks before snapping these pictures, I had seen a wisp of a cloud that I probably wouldn't have given any thought to.
But a British Airways pilot explained the clouds to a few curious pilots over our air-to-air frequency that's often used to share ride information or to collect an email address of a passing flight if an especially good photo is taken.
He spelled the cloud to a pilot, who asked again for the name. N-O-C-T-I-L-U-C-E-N-T.
I vowed to look that up when we landed.
Less than two weeks later, the captain and I dimmed the lights (a time-consuming task involving 30 knobs that will be the subject of a future Cockpit Chronicles video) so we could get a better look at what appeared to be the Northern Lights.
They were spectacular. But there was one thing that didn't seem quite right. They weren't moving at all. Typically the Aurora Borealis glow and change shapes every five seconds or so.
After a few minutes I mentioned noctilucent clouds to Mark, the captain. The clouds lit up the arctic sky, although it was two to three a.m. over this part of the Atlantic. The sun wouldn't be up for a few hours.
Initially I was disappointed that I only had a wide angle lens with me, but it turned out to be just the right look. I think it ranks as my favorite shot ever.
3) Satellites
I have to confess. I never knew it was possible to see satellites with the naked eye when I was a new pilot flying in Alaska. "Look at that traffic." I said to the captain.
But soon, it became obvious that this 'traffic' was missing the rotating beacon or nav-lights typical of an airplane. And it was traveling too fast for its size.
After that, I made it a practice to look for satellites when the conversation in the cockpit died off. Again, after dimming the cockpit lights, it was possible to see north-south satellites while flying over the interior of Alaska. I've since seen them going in other directions while flying in the jet. Typically, however they're best seen between one and three hours after sunset, or before sunrise. Just like the noctilucent clouds, the reflecting sun lights them up well.
It's possible to track the largest of these kind of objects, the International Space Station, and it's really worth marking down the times it will pass overhead your area for a look. Set your alarm and check it out yourself. Maybe you'll catch smaller satellite as well while looking. There's even a good iPhone or Android app that I've been using while away from the computer and you want to know when the next satellite, space station or shuttle will pass overhead.
4) Northern Lights
While not exclusively spotted from aircraft, there's no better time to see the the Northern Lights than while you're flying at night, away from the bright lights of a city with a clear view to the north. I've caught them as far north as Fairbanks, Alaska and as far south as Spokane, Washington (which were the brightest, surprisingly).
If you're on a night flight across the Atlantic and you just happen to be sitting on the left side of the airplane while traveling east, be sure to open your window shade once or twice to see if you can see anything glowing off in the distance. Very rarely will a pilot announce anything about the Aurora Borealis on these flights, since we presume that most passengers would rather not be disturbed. (See poll below).
5) Meteors and comets
Meteors are probably just as easy to see from the ground, but when you're in an airplane for hours at a time, with no buildings or lights to obscure your view, it's far more likely that you'll see more meteors than those stuck on the ground (a.k.a. groundlings). Usually just one pilot will see the meteor, saying something along the lines of, "Aww, you just missed a bright one there" to the other pilot. If the light show continues, someone might mention it on the air-to-air frequency. The airwaves were lit up years ago when the Hale-Bopp comet first appeared. And just as in the noctilucent example, someone on the air knew all about the comet and proceeded to tell us exactly what we were looking at.
6) Static discharges or St. Elmo's Fire
Finally, I thought I'd round out our collection of surreal sights with a video taken on one of my flights of a static buildup, sometimes referred to as St. Elmo's fire, that we occasionally see when flying in the vicinity of thunderstorms.
Wikipedia has a full explanation of what causes this.
With the advent of the new dimming window shades on the 787, passengers are apt to see more of this type of show in the future. All it takes is a slight glow coming through a dimmed window and passengers will hopefully want to investigate by brightening up their shade. Perhaps they'll get to see what we so often take for granted.
| Yes, let me see it! | |
|---|---|
| No, let me sleep. |
Photos by Kent Wien, Jerry Lodriguss and Aresauburn.
Cockpit Chronicles takes you along on some of Kent's trips as an international co-pilot on the Boeing 757 and 767 based in Boston. Have any questions for Kent? Check out the Cockpit Chronicles Facebook page or follow Kent on Twitter @veryjr.
Filed under: The Cockpit Chronicles















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Malaycobra Mar 11th 2011 2:34PM
The static discharges look cool, but do they cause any problems with the plane avionics?
If not, I fail to see why my ebook needs to be off under 10,000 feet.
I did wonder if it was so that I would pay attention to the safety messages and not have a potential projectile flying around in case of trouble. Then I see the guy next to me reading a hardcover book and I can't seem to figure it out.
PAUL Mar 16th 2011 9:10PM
Some (nowadays most) electronic devices have some sort of communication abilities that do actually interfere with the planes avionics and radios. So instead of announcing: "Please turn off Computers, phones, ipods, ipads, ect. But kindles, nooks, ect. are permissible." they just say to turn off all devices for simplicity.
Digi Mar 14th 2011 8:55PM
What's the point? I mean you REALLY need that ebook so friggin badly you prefer the maybe over the if? I mean really are you so self diluted that you must absolutely have to have your little electronic gadget on? Give me a break and get over yourself. It's a POTENTIAL SAFETY HAZARD. ENOUGH SAID. NO ONE owes you a reason why. YOU ARE ON A PLANE WITH OTHER PEOPLE, NOT JUST YOUR PRECIOUS SELF. So next time, leave your gadgets in your bag until you are told it is alright and shut the hell up.
Malaycobra Mar 14th 2011 9:20PM
Lay off the caffeine, get over yourself and take a Xanax.
I asked a perfectly reasonable question.
Douche.
Kent Wien Mar 14th 2011 9:33PM
Great question, actually.
Right now these devices are prohibited. But if an airline wanted to spend a ton of money, they could certify with the FAA that, say, the Kindle 2 is safe to use. But they'd have to go through the whole process again when the next version comes out.
After going through that effort, any other airline can then piggyback on the certification work that the first airline did, eliminating any competitive advantage they might have in touting the airline as being "Kindle friendly."
Airlines just aren't willing to do that. Maybe an aircraft manufacturer could pull it off, and extend the list of permissible devices with the FAA.
There's a good study done on the subject if you really want to understand what can be done to eliminate some of the interference concerns.
PDF Link to study: http://andreconsulting.com/Walen_Presentation.pdf
Malaycobra Mar 14th 2011 10:03PM
Thanks Kent.
I get the certification thing. Would be nice if electronics were allowed on again during those 2 hr 59 second ground holds ;-)
Now how about those static discharges? Do they cause any trouble with your instruments?
Kent Wien Mar 14th 2011 10:10PM
I've never seen any issues with our instruments during the static or "St. Elmo's fire."
During any prolonged delay, hopefully the crew is able to park the airplane, turn the seatbelt sign off and allow electronic devices. Not to mention shut down both engines.
Often times you're in a line of traffic that's moving very slowly. It becomes more difficult to allow bags out and people to get up at that point.
Malaycobra Mar 14th 2011 10:14PM
Yeah, I remember the bad old days. 6 hours on the tarmac a JFK, with the pilot stopping now and then and offering bathroom breaks.
We eventually returned to the terminal, where everyone was allowed off to get food etc.
Of course, half the passengers never noticed what gate we went to, so we had another 2 hour wait while everyone was rounded up.
The last family got quite a reception when they sheepishly stepped aboard the plane.
Robbie Mar 12th 2011 12:45AM
A couple of times, here in Vermont, I have seen Northern Lights displays that were so amazing that I wanted to awaken the whole town and call all of my friends and relatives to head outside and catch the shows. Simply fantastic! God is a Great Artist!
Digi Mar 14th 2011 8:57PM
The scary part is, northern lights are created by solar flares burning across the atmosphere....imagine a blow torch shooting its flame over a metal ball...now imagine if that flame was pointed directly at the ball........
Malaycobra Mar 14th 2011 10:11PM
Digi,
Not only do you have a big mouth, what comes out of it is nonsense.
Auroras are caused by ions impacting the earths atmosphere an being dragged towards the north pole.
It has no relation to a blow torch, and poses absolutely no risk at all.
Do you really think this flow of ions comes from the sun 93 million miles away, and just happens to hit a small area around the pole?
Try Googling it...then maybe you wouldn't come across like Chicken Little. Better yet, test your blow torch analogy on your own head. It seems it has the same consistency as a metal ball...
Kwjayhawk Mar 12th 2011 11:28AM
Instead of an over the intercom announcement, how bout some sort of message being displayed on the LCD inflight entrainment systems. Perhaps some sort of scrolling message like all the cable news stations.
Kent Wien Mar 12th 2011 11:29AM
That's a great idea. We often know when we'll be passing by something interesting. We could put up, "In 10 minutes there will be an excellent view of the Grand Canyon."
DrRobert Mar 14th 2011 10:41PM
That's a good ideabut they [the airlines] would probably make the fliers pay for it.
Neil Mar 13th 2011 11:08PM
Great post! Thanks for the illumination.
A scrolling notice is a good idea. I'm hoping that AVOD upgrades will eventually add onboard plane-cam feeds, maybe one left and another right. I would like to have the views I crave without the arguing and whining that comes with having my shade open (or eventually my 787 window undimmed).
PEGGY Mar 14th 2011 8:43PM
While there are more than enough explanations for what pilots see, there are a small percentage which cannot be explained. It is arrogant and egomaniacal to think we, as hominids, think we are the only life in a very expansive universe. Most of what IS seen is indeed explainable, but some is not.
Dan Skopp Mar 14th 2011 8:51PM
Very interesting photos. Having flown alot with the Air Force during my 39 years in the military, I have seen things like this before.
guy Mar 14th 2011 8:52PM
The best thing I've seen while flying is mountains sticking up through the clouds. It looks like an ocean of white with islands. Awesome to say the least-especially in the evening with a full moon. I also like the view of flying low along the beach during summer-BOOBIES!!!
KPCTE Mar 14th 2011 9:29PM
Bravooo!!!
Gary Mar 14th 2011 9:51PM
I used to fly a lot for work and one year flew across the midwest on July 4. Seeing many fireworks displays from 30,000 ft. was pretty amazing.