Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-16-2011 @ 3:36PM
Greg Gibson said...
It looks like most of the responders here are travel agents, and I'm not sure that I agree with the general consensus. Having read the article, I don't see any substantive advantage to going through an agent presented.
After resaerching and shopping around, I usually book with Expedia. Each time, I call them, talk to a personable rep, who invariable calls the property that I plan to visit, makes sure that it is understood what I want and expect, and the booking is made after confirmation of those two items. Seems pretty simple to me, and the only time I had a flight canceled, Expedia refunded my payment immediately and found an alternative flight within minutes.
My comments are in no way intended to slam travel agents. If going through an agent would make my travels more pleasant, I would not hesitate to do so. However, the only difference I can see is paying more to go through an agent. After all, they have to make a living too.