Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Knoebels could add two new roller coasters in 2011
Central Pennsylvania amusement park Knoebels could open two roller coasters next season. For a park with only three roller coasters in operation, that would be quite a boost. The small park is a fan favorite among theme park enthusiasts as it offers free admission, classic rides, and a homey non-commercial feel.
Black Diamond was purchased from Wildwood, New Jersey's Dinosaur Beach where it was known as Golden Nugget. The partially enclosed roller coaster sent guests on a themed mine car ride through the desert. The Golden Nugget operated from 1960 to 1992. And then it operated on and off until remaining closed since 1999.
After an unusually long construction period, Flying Turns, may finally open. It's an interesting throwback to a wooden bobsled roller coaster that hasn't existed in 40 years. After numerous setbacks hopefully 2011 will finally be the year when the ride's ready to open to the public.
Knoebels' calling card has been revitalizing classic roller coasters and these two new additions should perfectly fit the park's old school amusement park feel. Knoebels is also home to the critically acclaimed Phoenix which was reborn at the park after a previous life at a park in Texas.[Image credit: Flickr user milst1]
Filed under: Theme Parks












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Kenneth Shaw Jan 3rd 2011 5:46AM
Why is this author first claiming that "Knoebels to add two new roller coasters in 2011" and then later on state more than once that the Flying Turns may open in 2011? To use key words such as "may" or "hopefully" does not confirm that the ride will definitely open when the odds are that it will not after so many setbacks. If you're going to state that Knoebels "will" add two new roller coasters in 2011 then at least get your FACTS straight before you print them.
Joel Bullock Jan 3rd 2011 7:38AM
Good point Kenneth. That wasn't the best title when Knoebels hasn't confirmed Flying Turns for 2011. I changed it to 'could'. Thanks for the feedback.