Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-02-2010 @ 5:34PM
Mena said...
When Pearl Harbor was bombed America responded with the Nuclear Bomb, was that called for? I bet you don't mind because we won, and now you get to live an awesome life here and get to judge those who suffer in other parts of the world. If Canada attacked America we would defend ourselves, we wouldn't be like "Oh sorry for being here Canada, please do take our land!". No, we would fight back and maybe win and then we would celebrate the victory just like everyone else in the world.
Also, this is not a religious war. It is not the Jews against the Muslims, it is Israel against Lebanon. Lebanon is made up of 40% Christians and they have fought and died for their country just like the Muslims there do, side by side.
Reply
10-02-2010 @ 5:35PM
Mena said...
this was @ Dee
10-02-2010 @ 6:35PM
Joe said...
While technically your comment about America responding with the atomic bomb after pearl harbor was attack could be considered true, it was not the only factor in that decision. The main reason the bomb was dropped was to avoid countless casualties on both sides of the war. The Japanese were known fanatics to their cause and it was believed they would fight to a man for every island we took. though 150,000 to 250,000 japanese lost their lives in the bombing a drawn out war had the probability of costing close to a million lives. So in that sense it was a more humane option, of course not to the people being bombed but as they say war is hell, and if it was not for japan's action we probably would not have taken such an active role in that war.
Other then that I agree with your comment