Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Rant: The world needs to return to the supersonic jetliner era

Forget warm meals, smiling flight attendants or the right to check bags for free - the one thing I miss the most in the aviation world is supersonic travel. Sure, Concorde was an insanely expensive way to travel, and the plane had its fair share of technical and environmental issues, but she stood for something very important - the realization that travel by air should be faster.
In this day and age, it is absurd that a coast to coast flight has to take seven hours. With a supersonic flight, you could get on the plane at JFK, and get off in San Francisco a little over two hours later. Or how about flying from Los Angeles to Tokyo in five hours instead of eleven?
I'd even settle for the knowledge that a supersonic plane is under development, but after Concorde was put to rest, so was the chance that we'd see anything remotely like her in the next couple of decades. Every year, an aviation startup hits the news with their plans for a supersonic jet, but their plans usually end up just that - plans. Worst of all, many of the proposed supersonic jets don't even make it past the snazzy graphics and fake mockup image phase.
For supersonic travel to take off again, Boeing or Airbus will need to be the driving force. Sadly, Boeing stopped development of their Sonic Cruiser back in 2002 and focused their attention on the Dreamliner. So, until one of the major airplane makers gets back to work, we can only think back to the era of Concorde and the realization that we were more ahead of our time in 1969 than we are today.
Filed under: Airlines










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Darren Murph Sep 9th 2010 1:19PM
You aim too high.
I'd settle for fleets of aircraft made post-1980.
I can't believe how old and janky these planes are that the legacy carriers still use.
ncsustash Sep 9th 2010 2:54PM
I agree.....I find it hard to believe that the numbers can't work out that on popular business flights (NY-Toyko, Paris, London, LA). The aircraft manufacturers need to be prepared when this whole green efficiency thing runs it course and we get back to being able to pay for convienance.
Aaron Sep 9th 2010 3:46PM
I couldn't agree more. I've just started flying a whole lot for my company and I am coming to realize that my time spent on the airplane should be significantly less than it is. Come on, we haven't gotten any better at commercial flying since the 1960's. Its time for an upgrade. I started writing down my experiences flying and traveling heavily here http://hilarioustravel.blogspot.com/
Grant Martin Sep 9th 2010 11:35PM
Is that your pic?
Robert E. Coli Sep 15th 2010 7:25PM
What you are failing to realize is that, in this day of "ancillary revenue", I need to keep you onboard our planes for as long as possible so that I can sell you stuff. Our shareholders would be appalled at the idea of only keeping you captive for 3 hours when we now have your undivided attention for 7 hours.
Regards,
Robert E. Coli
CEO Thromby Air - Lowest of the Low
http://www.thrombyair.com