Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-07-2010 @ 8:17AM
Dan Bushey said...
Insane idea. The freight railroads have gotten rid of their train crews down to two persons. Both of them are on the lead locomotive now. Both are "qualified" engineers. And both are "qualified" conductors. Great idea, "part-time" engineer and "part-time" conductor. Under Amtrak and Federal rules, a passenger service engineer, can operate the passenger train with just one (1) person, as engineer in the locomotive cab, for four (4) hours, without second (Fireman position) engineer. The result is, only one (1) person operating/controlling locomotive and passenger train. And is alone in cab, for four (4) hours.
Reply
9-07-2010 @ 2:06PM
Imwithst UP id said...
I'm not sure where you've gotten your information about the major class 1 railroads. There are still 2 crewmembers in the controlling locomotive. One is a licensed class 1 Engineer and the other is a Qualified Conductor (currently there is not a Conductor certification inplace. Maybe 2011/12). Not all engineers have a Conductors qualification either. There maybe instances where both crewmembers are class 1 Engineers, but there are no allowences for "part-time" responsibilities.
While only 10% of the nations hazardous chemicals are transported by rail, that accounts for 80% of the total volume. Do you seriously want a "Robo" controller hundreds of miles away making realtime situational decisions? Think about that when you entertain the cost reduction motivation of the rail carriers.....Safety is NOT their primary concern....