Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
On long-term travel, snobbery & judgmental blogging

If you read Gadling, there's a half-decent chance that you read other travel blogs, too. Don't worry. We're cool having an open relationship. We read other sites, as well. Some have the financial backing of investors or media companies. Others are independent labors of love written by one or two people who enjoy travel, started putting words to HTML and hoped that someone would read the stories they shared. Many of the travel blogs that have been popping up lately focus on round-the-world (RTW) travel, career breaks and long-term (or, seemingly, permanent) travel. It's that last category of traveler (and their corresponding blogs) that has begun to grind my gears.
I love travel. I assume you, a Gadling reader, loves travel. But is traveling all of the time - with no home base - really that fantastic? Furthermore, do people who adhere to that lifestyle have the right to belittle those with stable lives and jobs? There's been a lot of idealizing of traveling permanently and, quite frankly, I find a lot of it condescending. It's time for a reality check.
I should note that I know Matt. I like Matt. The limited time we have shared has been pleasant and he seems like a nice guy. However, I do not think that his perma-travel lifestyle is one that should automatically be envied or revered. In fact, I don't want that life at all."In this modern world of 9 to 5, mortgages, carpools, and bills, our days can get pretty regimented and become pretty boring. Typically, our days rarely exhibit huge change. Under the weight of everything, we often lose track of what's important to us and what are goals are. We get so caught between commutes and errands or driving the kids to soccer, that we forget how to breath and to smell those roses. When I was home I could plan out my days months in advance. Why? Because they weren't going to be much different -- commute, work, gym, sleep, repeat. Yet on the road, every moment represents a new beginning. No day is the same. You can't plan out what will happen because nothing is set in stone."
What someone at the age of 29 who has been traveling for much of his adult existence could possibly understand about the life that he rails against is actually less perplexing than his broad generalizations about those of us who do not abide by his philosophies. While there are certainly countless people who are lost in a sea of TPS reports and hollow pursuits, to write off all people with stable, non-travel lives as working stiffs is condescending at best and offensive at worst.
There are more than enough "mommy bloggers" - many of whom also write about travel - who enjoy driving their kids to soccer while also taking them on holidays from Disney World to Djibouti. Is there a trade-off that comes with starting a family? Well, the number of blogs out there about taking kids on trips all over the globe would indicate that there doesn't have to be. And for the people who do stay home or perhaps only occasionally take traditional vacations, if they are happy, why is that bad?While defining why he travels, Matt says, "[w]e want to see the world, see something different, see something change. Travel allows for change...We all want something different from our daily routine, something to challenge us." Again, these are generalizations and gross misrepresentations that diminish the enriching and often diverse lives that people with roots firmly planted in one place have created for themselves.
His post also neglects to mention things like hobbies, families, friends, social functions and fulfilling lives that include careers and pursuits that make those so-called working stiffs happy. I have friends who are not travel writers. They have jobs in fields such as marketing, education, law and insurance. They are husbands, wives, parents, dog owners, volunteers and caregivers. They are also drummers in bands, founders of supper clubs, distillers of whiskey and triathletes. In short, they are well-rounded human beings.
I'm not alone in believing that people can have stable lives, travel only occasionally and still enjoy everything that the world has to offer. Over on the Resident Wayfarer blog [Disclosure: I know the author but am respecting his/her wish to remain anonymous], a post addressed this very topic. "To me, travel can't define a life, travel must be the thing that holds a mirror back up to yourself, to your life, and forces you to see it in a different light, through different eyes, reversed." In other words, travel provides a broader context within which you attempt to understand things, including yourself. The post closes with the following declaration:
In a very succinct manner, the author managers to sum up why not everyone with a 9-5 feels the way Matt suggested that they do."I remain the person with a home base that I love, a well-balanced wanderlust, and a pretty low bullshit-o-meter."
Over on SoSauce, Alisha Miranda also expressed her disdain for judgmental travelers who view their opinions on the subject as the gospel. [Disclosure: I am also friends with Alisha] She wrote,
To insinuate - or outright declare - that there is only one way to travel is narcissistic and condescending. It insults your audience and creates a false debate about the nature of travel. A debate that is actually more about the writer than it is about travel."...don't tell me the right and wrong way to travel. I don't want to hear it. I'm doing fine on my 2 passport stamps and don't need your worldly views dragging me down for whatever reason you feel necessary. I'll travel however I want, whenever I want, to whereever [sic] I want. The lifestyle I choose as a traveler is entirely my decision...It seems like travel writers these days won't tolerate anything less than a full-time backpacking lifestyle."
People travel for myriad reasons. Be it to take a break from work, introduce their children to Cinderella or learn about new cultures. They also do it to run away. Or to avoid a reality that scares or confuses them. Is eschewing the "real world" to travel permanently as difficult as those long-term travelers suggest? Is it more challenging than raising children, being an active member of a community or pouring yourself into a hobby that becomes a passion?
It seems to me that creating a fulfilling life - however you define that - is your own business. It may include travel. It may not. The travel could be road trips to ride roller coasters, all-inclusive getaways to tropical beaches or, yes, packing up completely and leaving your current life behind. That's up to you. And you know yourself a whole lot better than any writer does.












Reader Comments (Page 6 of 6)
Jon Aug 21st 2010 7:59PM
I really don't think that Matt guy meant it like that. Anyway, it's good to give people the benefit of the doubt and assume the best in others. It's Ramadan after all.
Darren Craig Aug 22nd 2010 5:27PM
This post has obviously touched a lot of nerves with people, and I'm a bit late coming into the comments.
I think the thing to remember is there's no right or wrong way to travel. Some people love long term travel, but writers like Matt often comment that some of parts of their travels aren't as enjoyable any more - e.g. not getting excited about going to a new hostel with similar conversations 'where have you been, what have you done' etc.
There's a lot of generalisations going on, but I think all the following are true, depending on what type of people are being talked about :
- many long term travellers would be jealous of people who work '9-5' and actually love their jobs (I recently left for another long term trip as I couldn't work out an alternative to my 9-5 that would get me an income in a 'home' location I wanted to move to)
- many long term travellers wouldn't like to be in a standard '9-5' - it doesn't mean there's anything wrong with them
- many '9-5' workers may get envious of the *style* of travel long termers have - but remember you can 'backpack' on a 2 week trip if that's what you want to experience
- if you normally travel on a 2 week package, or a group tour and enjoy it, keep on enjoying it
- basically if you like to travel, just enjoy the way you do it - whether thats weekend international trips, overnighters in your back yard, long term solo, group tours, backpacking, luxury 5 star, or flashpacking.....it really doesn't matter.
Kristin Aug 25th 2010 9:54PM
Everyone travels or doesn't travel for a wide variety of reasons. I have been in both camps during my 23 years and I think we have a world to understand from both sides.
Natalia from Let's Do Something Different.com Aug 26th 2010 2:15AM
Thank you for this. I write a travel blog, but it is mainly so that family and friends can see what we are up to. Due to one of us having a job that means re-locating every few years, we have a fairly 'nomadic' lifestyle, but we also have houses to maintain, schools to enrol in, bills to pay, and jobs to go to. Does that make us 'working stiffs'? Even if it does, I don't care. We still travel very regularly, and made the move half-way around the world so we could be closer to travel networks which would make that travel easier. But just because we haven't sold everything and are doing it permanently, it doesn't mean our travel is any less enjoyable, or meaningful.
Ordinary Traveler Aug 26th 2010 4:22PM
I think you may have misunderstood my comment. Like you, we also have old cars, no tv, no new gadgets, and live very simply. Actually that is one of the things we talk about on our blog. Not everybody who holds down a 9-5 job is materialistic. I think that is an incorrect stereotype.
Owning your own business and working from wherever you want is still working in my opinion. I work wirelessly and my boyfriend is currently working in an office but that will not always be the case. We have also traveled to many places and sell photos and souvenirs from those places. Travel is in my blood and I will be the first one to admit it has many advantages and helps me to be a better person.
I was merely stating with my comment that there is not just one way of travel. People who hold down 9-5 jobs in an office can travel often if they want also. They can ask for 6 weeks off to travel and be surprised that many bosses will consider it, even in the US. With our blog, we want to give others hope that just because you are currently working 9-5 does not mean you cannot travel to many amazing places.
Stephanie Aug 27th 2010 7:16PM
Honestly, I hate the 9 to 5. I hate sitting at a desk all day. I hate staring at my computer and seeing the dumb notification pop up that i've received yet another email. the longer I stared at the screen, the more my dreams seemed to become less of a priority - the more i lost interest in pursuing my #1 career choice and the harder it became to focus on learning other languages and continuing to expand on the ones I already know - all of which are my true priorities.
So I began searching for opportunities to spice things up a bit and alas, I'm moving to France to a job that's far from the mundane 9 to 5 I was doing and will help me stay focused on creating the life it is I want - one of total freedom.
So I don't think Matt was being judgmental. I've heard it said that if it doesn't offend, it doesn't apply. Are you feeling your priorities slip away?
nicholas Aug 29th 2010 4:59PM
What on earth are you wining about judgmental for and then saying you "hate" twice in your first paragraph? MattKepnes is every bit as judgmental as you are if not far more so, no wonder that you rush to judge others and whitewash his mindset. Most of the universe live on a single income or work for others. Get over it already and grow up. Your sense of entitlement is almost as vomit-making as your icon's.
Stephanie Aug 29th 2010 9:10PM
dude, calm down! I can hate living the nine to five if I want to... it's my life, my preference. that doesn't mean I judge others who live their life that way. no one is so much the wiser for deciding to live their life one or the other. to each their own! lol your anger is so amusing.
G. Michael Schneider Sep 14th 2010 8:13PM
Thank you for writing this, and I could not agree more. I would categorize Nomadic Matt and his ilk as a "blog genre"-- people who sell their house, quit their job (if they had one), kiss friends and family good-bye, and do nothing but travel year after year after year... However, nowhere in their stories do they mention how they are paying for this voyage of self-discovery. Often when you dig into their "About Me" page you find out they are either independently wealthy, won the lottery, are living off the largesse or parents or exes, or are denuding their life savings. Think "Eat, Pray, Love"
However, there is an alternative. In my own blog, On The Other Guy's Dime: A Professional's Guide to Traveling Without Paying" I describe how to take a working vacation--an overseas posting of from 1 to 12 months where you earn enough to cover most or all of your living expenses. The best thing about all of this is you don't have to be independently wealthy and you don't have to give up your day job. I like this approach to travel rather than the wandering nomad approach. What I like best is that when you return you come back to your same home and job. No bridges burned behind you.
Mikeachim Sep 23rd 2010 1:18PM
You're absolutely right. It's a patronising point of view to take.
But it's also a disingenuous one. As I've said in a comment on the article itself, Matt isn't living the lifestyle he's pitching as the superior way to live. He has various online business. He has commitments. He can't live "on a whim" and approach every day 100% afresh. What he's talking about is a lifestyle he's renegotiated so he can move around - but really, he's in full-time work (on *his* terms, but still full-time working).
I also take issue with the suggestion that every moment is a new beginning. This is one of the big issues with expectations of travel - that you can leave yourself behind and have a complete personality makeover. Whether Matt is saying this directly or not, it sounds like it's being suggested in the article. It's claiming that travel has the potential to completely remake our lives from scratch, and I'm tired of hearing that claim because it's sloppily-thought-out, faux self-help quackery. It's a recipe for disappointment, and for living your daily life as an exercise of irresponsible delayed gratification until that special moment when you start travelling and can have a perfect existence.
Ain't so. We always, *always* take ourselves with us.
And that's a strength of travel, not a weakness.