Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Hotels sued for enabling peeping tom
ESPN sportscaster (and third place winner of Dancing with the Stars) Erin Andrews has filed a civil lawsuit for $1.2 million against seven hotels (including both Marriott and Radisson) for negligence, invasion of privacy, and emotional distress as they enabled an ambitious peeping tom to film her naked.Illinois insurance salesman (creepy!) Michael David Barrett stalked Ms. Andrews as she traveled the country, learning which hotels the reporter was staying in--as well as her room number--from hotel staff. Barrett would then check into the adjacent hotel room and alter Andrews' peephole in order to film her naked and distribute the clips on the internet. He has since been charged, found guilty of interstate stalking, and sentenced to more than two years in jail.
Typically, hotels brandish non-disclosure agreements and front desk employees will refuse to give out names or room numbers of guests. Andrews says she is suing the hotels "for making my most personal moments public." The hotels named in the suit include the florid Marriott Nashville at Vanderbilt University, the Radisson hotel in Milwaukee, and an another unnamed hotel in Columbus, Ohio. Regardless of the success of the case, the hubbub is likely to increase enforcement of privacy policies at such middle-rate hotels.
Until that day, here's a small travel tip for hotel guests: if you don't want people peeking into your room, cover the peephole with a piece of tape,
For further reading, check Robert K. Cole's excellent analysis of this situation.
(Photo: Flickr/Steve Garfield)
Filed under: North America, United States, Hotels and Accommodations, News












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Robert Cole Jul 16th 2010 10:57AM
PLEASE DO NOT ADVISE PEOPLE TO OBSTRUCT THE PEEPHOLE!. That form of ridiculous overreaction creates a significant personal safety risk for hotel guests.
Peepholes provide a critically important security feature for travelers. True, they may potentially be tampered with by a peeping tom, but that risk is much lower than opening a door with an obstructed peephole if there is an intruder or a fire in the hallway.
Hotels guests should check the peephole when checking in, and hotel housekeepers should do the same as a standard practice when cleaning the room.
If there is a problem with the peephole, change rooms.
Blocking the peephole, especially permanently with gum endangers not only the person initially blocking the peephole, but all others staying in the room thereafter.
Hotels do need to improve guest security procedures - especially revealing room numbers and names at the desk, providing both pieces of information on key packets and providing guest room corridor security cameras.
Guest security and life safety needs to be the top priority for hotels.
Here is my blog post on the topic from last year: http://j.mp/ML56p
james Jul 16th 2010 1:21PM
Robert Cole, totally agree with you. The basic suggestion is more than overreaction, but the used gum idea adds gross and disgusting to the mix.