Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-02-2010 @ 4:16PM
James said...
People like Joe need to wise up. It's not saying you won't be able to go Antarctica. Just the large cruise ships will be banned, it even states you would still able to take smaller ships there. Why the ban? First of all the amount of fuel in these ships is staggering. If there were an incident involving a major fuel spill it would be devasting to the ecosystem. I have been to Antarctica to shoot a documentary on an anti whaling campaign. Every year the Japanese goverment sends a factory ship down there that processes the illegally harvested whales. If that ship were to sink, the damage would be irreperable. By the way that ship has caught fire twice already and nearly sunk both times. Maybe this ban would help to keep that ship out of the Antarctic sanctuary. So John if your argument is that you want to go there because of your right to travel, then why argue against a ruling that would help maintain a healthy ecosystem so everyone can enjoy it?
Reply