Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-14-2010 @ 2:36PM
Kevin said...
If the flying public would be willing to pay for a ticket what it actually costs the airline to fly from point A to point B, there would not be the need to have bag fees and removing other amenities that used to be included. However, the flying public would much prefer to put their (and their loved ones) lives in the air at an altitude of 33,000 feet in the cheapest seat available. Many thousands of experienced airline employees are out of work and the maintenance sent to third world countries with little to no oversight. All this to ensure a cheap seat.
Reply
4-14-2010 @ 8:39PM
ruth said...
I'm glad someone else thinks like this.Airlines run businesses, and businesses need to be profitable. Flying is not a right. Figure out how much it costs per seat, add your profit, and move along. if you dont like, it either start your own airline, or stay home.