Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Is the U.S. Forest Service spying on visitors?
Our country's national parks and forests are intended as sanctuaries, zones of peace and quiet where visitors can get away from the give and take of modern life. But don't expect to have it all to yourself: these days you might be joined by hidden cameras, placed by the U.S. Forest Service. Don't break out the tinfoil hat just yet; this "conspiracy theory" may have some truth to it. According to a South Carolina newspaper, the agency has been placing hidden cameras in forest areas for some time.Visitor Herman Jacob was camping and looking for firewood in South Carolina's Francis Marion National Forest last month when he stumbled across a wire. The wire took him to a video camera and a remote antenna sitting in the middle of the woods. Perplexed, Jacob took the camera home with him and contacted the local police, who explained it had been set up to monitor "illicit activities" and demanded its return. Further investigation by the Island Packet, the newspaper that researched the story, confirmed that the Forest Service has used the cameras as a tool of law enforcement for "numerous years." A Forest Service spokesperson quoted in the article indicated that images taken of those not targeted by an investigation are not kept.
In light of the fact drug cartels have been growing marijuana on federal land for some time, this type of surveillance makes more sense. And, legally, the cameras are on public land - surveillance is permissible. But is a policy that allows this type of monitoring, particularly in a quiet forest, a violation of our trust? Or is it a necessary evil, preventing misuse of public land? Leave us your thoughts in the comments.
[Via Metafilter]
Filed under: North America, United States










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Gary Apr 9th 2010 6:09AM
Boy I hope they are.
Chris Apr 9th 2010 12:27PM
Cameras everywhere!! Good idea.. Look how fast the brits solved a terror case because they had cameras everywhere. The newspaper that tried to make an issue out of this must be owned by the tribune company. Thesame people that on the sun-sentinel in broward county
Josh Apr 13th 2010 10:03PM
@Chris,
What crime did the UK solve with cameras. Stop being a worry-wart. Cameras are an invasion and are totally not necessary anywhere in the forest.
Bryce Apr 9th 2010 6:14AM
Think about the sats in orbit, They can read the print on a pack of smokes in your hand. Big brother is watching everywhere. You have no rights or privacy.
rantfreely Apr 9th 2010 12:25PM
Paranoid much?
Watch me all day long I say,
Enjoy the show!
Oh and Bryce, guess what? they can hear you too and read your mind.
Thomas Apr 9th 2010 12:36PM
If you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to worry about.
squeezeyourneck Apr 9th 2010 1:34PM
WE CAN SEE YOU BRYCE, YOU'RE GONNA GO BLIND IF YOU KEEP DOING THAT.
Jungle Jim Apr 11th 2010 12:50PM
"If you're not doing anything wrong you have nothing to worry about"
Great! When we pass gun control we can use the cameras to arrest all those people with illegal fire arms! Then we'll see Republicans do the all-too-familiar about face and insist that domestic spying is unconstitutional. Mindless tools.
Jim Apr 9th 2010 6:37AM
I think there should be hidden cameras in lots of places owned by the public. For example: the offices of congressmen, governors, and just about anyone elected by the people. I'd like to know exactly how our government is run, and how many criminals are operating under the cover of lawmakers?
Joe Apr 9th 2010 7:31AM
TOUCHE' JIM
james Apr 9th 2010 10:21AM
Sorry Jim, it wouldn't work. Too many of our politicians would be in jail and there would be no one left to run the government.
snowmassey Apr 9th 2010 9:23AM
There should be a camera on the criminal limbaugh 24/7 to
catch his drug dealing and using.
hmilorjr Apr 9th 2010 10:39AM
Totally agree with you. I would love to have one in the oval office when Obama meets with his zars
Nancy! Apr 9th 2010 11:04AM
Your logic is impeccable, which is exactly why we know it won't happen.
r Apr 9th 2010 11:20AM
i think the president and ALL elected officials should be drug tested just like everyone who works at McDonalds etc.
DAVID Apr 9th 2010 11:32AM
HEAR HEAR!!!!
USABrad Apr 14th 2010 4:51PM
Now your on to something there Jim. Good for the goose and gander alike. :)
ROLLANDO Apr 9th 2010 7:11AM
If it helps catching people planting marijuana or using the parks as a place to stash drugs, "YES" please do use these security cameras. But at the same time, do not abuse the use of it over something trivial.
mikey Apr 9th 2010 8:13AM
Oh yeah idiot,,the American way,,catch drug dealers and realease child molesters! You re a fool!
nzm Apr 9th 2010 6:47AM
which begs the an answer to the question:
If a camera takes a photo in a forest, and no one sees it, did it really take a photo?
;.)