Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
The W Hollywood won't let guests use its pool

In what must be a first for a big hotel, the W Hollywood is telling guests they are not permitted to use the rooftop pool.
It seems ludicrous, but it's true. That's because Starwood, which owns the combination hotel/residence property at Hollywood and Vine, contracted a slew of hotel services out to third parties. Drai's, a Las Vegas nightspot promotion outfit, opened on March 17, and was charged with nightlife at the W, too, presumably because the hotel wanted to purchase some off-the-shelf cachet with hipsters rather than earning it through the merits of the product.
I found this out, of course, the worst way a guest can: By staying there, and being denied access to a swim. On a recent 85-degree Sunday, I tried taking the elevator to the rooftop pool (called WET) for some of those famous California rays. After all, my room on the 11th floor was literally thumping with the beats coming through the ceiling, and I wanted to enjoy a little of this party that I had to put up with despite paying $230 a night.
I'm a reporter at heart, though, and undeterred, I skulked up a service elevator with a friend. I paid $10 to bribe a staff member to let us into what Drai's publicizes as a "sexy poolside affair with House music and Hollywood's elite."
Drai's is dreadful. There wasn't a spare inch. A DJ blasted beats, pneumatic girls danced laconically as they stood on the cushioned lounge chairs, and shirtless boys in fedoras smoked cigarettes in the pool while they scoped the girls' bikini bottoms from shin level. My friend glanced around and proclaimed it "a douche-tacular." Nearby was a big empty table marked "reserved." We were told we couldn't be seated there because "it's the owner's table." It was like this all day, from 10am to 10pm, exclusive of guests unless they greased the right palm.
A luxe L.A. hotel without a pool is like a wedding without a cake. A banquet without forks. A pretentious product without a shred of class.
Am I willing to praise a hotel when it does something right? Only too willing. The W has a lively lobby bar, supremely comfortable beds, and the Sanctuary, an octopus-like device that can charge almost anything you have, is a lifesaver. The views of the Capitol Records building and downtown L.A. are unobstructed, and the staff, although saddled with defending a misguided policy, is accommodating and professional.
That same hotel staff, by the way, is generally mortified by the arrangement with Drai's. One member told me, confidentially, she was sick of having to be "on the front lines" for Starwood's greedy scheme. She said half her weekend was spent soothing the fury of rebuffed guests. She also complained about one drunk girl who, just the day before, had vomited in the designstudio-created lobby. "This isn't Vegas," the staffer astutely pointed out. "A lot of dedicated business travelers stay with us. They don't want this."
I have a sinking feeling this trend won't be unusual in the future. People are making a lot of money off the W's cynical elitism. It's a short-sighted victory for Starwood, though, because such Vegas shenanigans will only turn off regular customers, and when the hotel's It Factor goes off the boil, its alienated customer base won't be likely to return.
Thanks to the travel industry's ever-escalating addiction to extra fees and thirst for found money, greed is elbowing aside even the inclination to provide the simplest amenities.
Jim McPartlin, W Hollywood's general manager, gave this non-apology for excluding guests from its pool:
"We have been absolutely overwhelmed by the response we have received from guests since we opened our doors 2 months ago. With the opening of Drai's Hollywood on 17th March, the interest in the hotel has increased beyond our wildest dreams, and as such we are having to limit guest access to the WET Deck and Drai's.....we simply cannot keep up with the demand! We are aware that operationally this is causing problems for some of our guests and we are working very closely with our partners to come up with a solution that works for everyone."
Update: The furor caused by our exposé caused the hotel to revise its policy. Click here for the story behind that, including an apology by McPartlin.
Gallery: Top Ten Strangest Hotel Guest Requests
Filed under: North America, United States, Hotels and Accommodations













Reader Comments (Page 4 of 4)
Tigershark8 Apr 6th 2010 12:09PM
I live in SoCal and I think LA is one of the most interesting cities in the world. I love SF and NY, too. I dont feel the need to judge one over the other.
But...no offense to all of you who think you are superior based upon where you live, but there are douchebags EVERYWHERE and these douchebags need a place to go.
The W Hotel caters to douchebags everywhere. Im a platinum Starwood guest and have NEVER had what I consider to be a good experience at a W Hotel. The one on 48th and Lexington is the NY Version of Douche. The one in downtown SF is the Bay Area Version of Douche. Ans so on.
W means Douche and thats that.
So, if you're not a douche, stay at the Westin or an Aloft or the St Regis or the SLS or the Bonaventure, all Starwood properties. (Or even a Sheraton if you must...) But dont blame the douches for hanging out at a place thats designed for, and marketed to, douches.
producer Apr 6th 2010 12:09PM
i'm a producer for an ad agency and we travel in with large crews and long stays for jobs. we liked the remodeled roosevelt in l.a. - for about 5 minutes. the first time they pulled this crap at their "party pool", that was it. never went back, and never will. you are right - the W is making a serious mistake by pulling the same game. business travellers will move on and they will be left with nothing but lots of local partiers on the roof - but empty rooms throughout the hotel.
Doug Apr 6th 2010 12:18PM
With such deplorable behavior on the part of the W Hotel chain, no wonder the Manhattan W hotel was recently sold at a FORECLOSURE auction for a paultry $2.3 million. Those idiots have no idea how to run a quality hotel ... after all, its the Hotel business, not the Pool business that pays the bills.
Aaron Black Apr 6th 2010 6:15PM
Starwood must be kidding themselves.
Jim Apr 6th 2010 1:28PM
Thanks for your story. Unbelievable. I have never had any reason to doubt Starwood but now I will definitely think twice before booking there.
I know the hotel biz is in hot water. They won't extract themselves from it by alienating their market segment.
Are they greedy or just stupid?
MOTHER DELICIOUS Apr 6th 2010 1:33PM
well i will not be stay at this w in hollywood ca . thank you for the info. that was a stupid move on the w. to even think a pool would work for a night club. well the next thing you will here about the hollywood w will be a 20 yr old collage student drowens after have\ing a few drinks. given to to a minor. by the w. not the club becuse its on the grounds . good luck w. on keeping your pool side club going and the motel 6 like kid party place on hollywood blvd .
takeshi Apr 6th 2010 5:37PM
sounds like Los Angeles is a city for losers.
Tigershark8 Apr 6th 2010 6:13PM
Its very simple:
"If you dont want to hang around the young Hollywood crowd, THEN DONT GO TO HOLLYWOOD!!"
Would you idiots check into the Ritz in lower Manhattan and then complain that the place was crawling with (shock!) STOCKBROKERS?!!
Or check into the Wynn Las Vegas and then complain about being surrounded by (horror!) GAMBLERS, DRINKERS, and WH*RES?!!
Its their place and thats where they go. A pool bar SHOULD be filled with the hottest kids you can find. Would you rather that every tourist from the midwest be allowed in to tan their beer bellies while guzzling umbrella drinks by the gallon?
Its the 6000 block of Hollywood Blvd, people. Duh! So its going to cater to the locals, who just happen to be the highest percentage of hotties per square block on the planet, not just the occasional business traveler who wants to sit by the pool and read a book. Its party central. Either party or stay elswhere. There are TONS of options in Los Angeles.
LA is a VAST city of 10 million people. If you dont like Hollywood, then go Downtown LA, Santa Monica, Los Feliz, Silver Lake, South Bay, the Valley, Melrose, Beverly Hills, etc. etc. ANYWHERE BUT HOLLYWOOD!
BTW, Ive been to that bar. its very young. Not my thing. But they let me in because they know me from Drai's in Vegas and they know Im going to be cool about it and not act like Ive never seen anything like that before.
I PREFER a hotel that caters to locals, personally. Its what makes a hotel interesting. If you dont, there are plenty of hotels near the airport that would love your business.
Steve Apr 7th 2010 1:02AM
You are an idiot
KingSlav Apr 6th 2010 10:08PM
Good to know. This story would have been even more informative if it discussed whether the pool policy was explained to guests when making a reservation, at check-in or not at all.
Steve Apr 7th 2010 12:57AM
Not only will never stay at the hotel . I"m never going to stay at ANY Starwood Hotel again and I'm going to make sure that the entire world knows about it
tigershark8 Apr 7th 2010 2:22AM
Good. You couldnt get in anyway.
Linda Apr 17th 2010 3:46AM
the Mondrian hotel in Scottsdale Arizona was the same way.It was all about how much money you had to tip. I worked there for 5 years and it was all about money, sex and drugs.Thank god people stop going there after the underage bust.The mondrian hotel in scottsdale went belly up after the famos guest stoped coming there.The W,s and mondrian hotel are the same, the more they can promote sex and drugs they will keep on getting the same crown. spoiled rich kids/.
philipb Apr 18th 2010 11:43AM
As a pretty frequent hotel guest (120+ nights/year) my experience is that flash wears thin really fast. Even though my budget is fairly unrestricted it's hard to beat the Marriott chain or Westins for quiet, comfortable service in a property you can get work & rest done (monogamous & sleepy). A fridge in the room beats a hipster experience every time!
By comparison, Starwood has always been spotty, many times I've had to hold their feet to the fire just to get the benefits already promised by their frequent guest program.
David Ricardo Apr 20th 2010 5:50AM
I understand the issue here but it's the W. In Hollywood. If you want to avoid pretension there are a shitload of hotels you can stay in around LA that have pools and don't come with the attitude and cliquey feel.
Thanks
David Ricardo
http://www.baapartmentrental.com/
lenny Apr 20th 2010 1:53PM
I'm not surprised to hear this about Starwood. They're the lowest -- no consideration for hotel guests or employees; you can tell how well a company is run by the mood of the employees. Several years ago, Starwood bought out Sheraton. For years, we'd been spending our family vacation at a Sheraton; even though it was a part of a big chain, the management ran it as if it was a small individual hotel they owned personally, & it showed. We were on a first-name basis w/many of the employees, & from our first time there, received out-of-the-ordinary considerations when we asked, & even when we didn't. At the end of our last stay there, the manager we dealt with had given us a gift she'd paid for out of her own pocket. The last time we booked there, we spoke to the manager around 3 weeks before our arrival & set everything up; we were looking forward to another great time. When we arrived, we were shocked to find that the chain had been sold to Starwood & the entire management unceremoniously fired (certainly not for cause, unless "excessive competence" can be considered a cause); they clearly hadn't had a clue what was coming when we'd spoken to them. We were informed blandly that the heavily-promoted children's activities, a deal-breaker for us & our 8-year-old daughter, had been canceled, *even though the signs advertising them were still posted in the lobby & elevator*. Under some pressure, the new management did grudgingly pay for carfare for our daughter to take part in activities at another hotel in the area, so she had something to do for 2 days out of the week we were there. The remaining staff appeared to be generally trying to do their best under difficult circumstances, but they were obviously terrified by the sudden & groundless firings of their colleagues, praying with every step that they wouldn't be next. It cast a pall over our entire stay. Needless to say, that's the last time we've booked at any Starwood property.