Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
The W Hollywood won't let guests use its pool

In what must be a first for a big hotel, the W Hollywood is telling guests they are not permitted to use the rooftop pool.
It seems ludicrous, but it's true. That's because Starwood, which owns the combination hotel/residence property at Hollywood and Vine, contracted a slew of hotel services out to third parties. Drai's, a Las Vegas nightspot promotion outfit, opened on March 17, and was charged with nightlife at the W, too, presumably because the hotel wanted to purchase some off-the-shelf cachet with hipsters rather than earning it through the merits of the product.
I found this out, of course, the worst way a guest can: By staying there, and being denied access to a swim. On a recent 85-degree Sunday, I tried taking the elevator to the rooftop pool (called WET) for some of those famous California rays. After all, my room on the 11th floor was literally thumping with the beats coming through the ceiling, and I wanted to enjoy a little of this party that I had to put up with despite paying $230 a night.
I'm a reporter at heart, though, and undeterred, I skulked up a service elevator with a friend. I paid $10 to bribe a staff member to let us into what Drai's publicizes as a "sexy poolside affair with House music and Hollywood's elite."
Drai's is dreadful. There wasn't a spare inch. A DJ blasted beats, pneumatic girls danced laconically as they stood on the cushioned lounge chairs, and shirtless boys in fedoras smoked cigarettes in the pool while they scoped the girls' bikini bottoms from shin level. My friend glanced around and proclaimed it "a douche-tacular." Nearby was a big empty table marked "reserved." We were told we couldn't be seated there because "it's the owner's table." It was like this all day, from 10am to 10pm, exclusive of guests unless they greased the right palm.
A luxe L.A. hotel without a pool is like a wedding without a cake. A banquet without forks. A pretentious product without a shred of class.
Am I willing to praise a hotel when it does something right? Only too willing. The W has a lively lobby bar, supremely comfortable beds, and the Sanctuary, an octopus-like device that can charge almost anything you have, is a lifesaver. The views of the Capitol Records building and downtown L.A. are unobstructed, and the staff, although saddled with defending a misguided policy, is accommodating and professional.
That same hotel staff, by the way, is generally mortified by the arrangement with Drai's. One member told me, confidentially, she was sick of having to be "on the front lines" for Starwood's greedy scheme. She said half her weekend was spent soothing the fury of rebuffed guests. She also complained about one drunk girl who, just the day before, had vomited in the designstudio-created lobby. "This isn't Vegas," the staffer astutely pointed out. "A lot of dedicated business travelers stay with us. They don't want this."
I have a sinking feeling this trend won't be unusual in the future. People are making a lot of money off the W's cynical elitism. It's a short-sighted victory for Starwood, though, because such Vegas shenanigans will only turn off regular customers, and when the hotel's It Factor goes off the boil, its alienated customer base won't be likely to return.
Thanks to the travel industry's ever-escalating addiction to extra fees and thirst for found money, greed is elbowing aside even the inclination to provide the simplest amenities.
Jim McPartlin, W Hollywood's general manager, gave this non-apology for excluding guests from its pool:
"We have been absolutely overwhelmed by the response we have received from guests since we opened our doors 2 months ago. With the opening of Drai's Hollywood on 17th March, the interest in the hotel has increased beyond our wildest dreams, and as such we are having to limit guest access to the WET Deck and Drai's.....we simply cannot keep up with the demand! We are aware that operationally this is causing problems for some of our guests and we are working very closely with our partners to come up with a solution that works for everyone."
Update: The furor caused by our exposé caused the hotel to revise its policy. Click here for the story behind that, including an apology by McPartlin.
Gallery: Top Ten Strangest Hotel Guest Requests
Filed under: North America, United States, Hotels and Accommodations













Reader Comments (Page 3 of 4)
Amber Apr 4th 2010 8:41PM
Actually my ex husband is from Orange County, and now two of my children live there. They feel the same way about the large amount of Hollywood influence but with work and school and the economy it is not the best time for a move. Obviously there are some wonderful areas and people just like anywhere and the weather is great. But in the same way that the Las Vegas casinos have an effect on the city in general, so it is in most cities. And I do not live in the lovely cities that I spoke of so I am not coming from a position of elitism. If you had to pick between NYC, El Paso Texas, or Santa Barbara, you also would have your reasons based on weather, economics, social standard, etc.. And often what I hear from So Cal people is that San Francisco is so 'pedestrian' and everyone wears black. We all have our views. Santa Barbara? Count me in.
Johndoe654 Apr 5th 2010 5:49AM
I don't know why people are so surprised. This same thing happened a few years ago at The Roosevelt/Tropicana.
jason Apr 5th 2010 10:56AM
I have stayed at the new W in Boston and Atlanta, and the service at both Hotels is horrible. In trying to build this W empire, they have forgotton the focus should be on the guest experience. Everything is modern and cozy. The properties are beautiful and the restarants are hot... but after the buzz wears off, it will be just an overpriced weekend at a hotel that underacheives its promises and fails to deliver the standard sets by ridiculously high prices.
Steve Apr 5th 2010 7:18PM
Wah wah wah I am spending $230/night at a hotel during a time when tons of people are losing jobs and getting less than $230/week for unemployment benefits.
I feel very bad for you having to sneak into some crappy pool party man, really. Your life sucks.
Babyfacemagee Apr 6th 2010 3:36AM
I'm gonna open up a 'no douchebags allowed' hotel right down the street from the W.
You're invited.
Of course then the kinds of people that are stupid enough to wait in line to go to the W hotel pool will say WE'RE douchebags for not letting them into our hotel.
Funny how that works. That's LA for ya.
DJR Apr 5th 2010 8:12PM
Another example of hotels treating customers as 'hostages' rather than as 'guests'.
The hotel's website mentions the pool (opening in Feb 2010) and, unlike several other features of the place does not mention that there is a charge for it or that it's not really for hotel guests.
Good luck with that one, W.
ren Apr 6th 2010 1:09AM
been there and NEVER going back.
Steve Apr 6th 2010 1:29AM
I had a great time at the W, Drais really makes the W a destination rather then a hotel. The pool party on sunday was amazing, the pool itself and its surroundings are beautiful, especially the women. Staff in both the hotel and Drais was exceptional and very curteous. Overall this was the best stay i have had in LA in a long time!
Fred Apr 6th 2010 1:49AM
Why don't they just build another pool for paying customers?
joann Apr 6th 2010 1:54AM
Any hotel that does not allow its guests to use the pool area for free, doesn't deserve anyones business. If more people spread the word about those that don't, they will soon change their policy or be out of business. I, personally boycott any hotel that won't let guests use the pool area for free.
Ryan Apr 6th 2010 2:01AM
I dislike the W. Once they gave me a dinner reservation and then asked me to eat within 30 minutes because a VIP was going to get the table next.
Road Warrior Apr 6th 2010 2:56AM
I'm out of town every other week (about 20 times/year). In cities with a W, that's where I stay. I need the peace, convenience and a comfortable refuge from exhausting business meetings. This nonsense with the pool in Hollywood is further evidence that W management has decided to value short-term profit over a long-term investment in customer satisfaction. The hotel manager's response is an unprofessional prevarication. I won't stay at W in the future.
Val Killmore Apr 6th 2010 6:06AM
The funniest thing is that this is built on public property over the subway station. Such luxury, hahahah.
It is like the Roosevelt Hotel pool, which guests pretty much can't get into, either. And the guests can't get into the hotel bar, etc.
Only turds stay at these hotels as repeat guests, because of all the junk the guests have to put up with -- unbearable noise, rooms not quite right, etc. Stay there once, you fooled me; stay there twice, I'm a fool.
Real people go to real hotels.
I think most of those pool-dweller types are actually "models" being paid by the hour to go hang by the pool. The casting call says you have to look good in a bikini - or shirtless with a fedora and cigarette. 20-somethings only hang by this pool because they are being paid to do so. They "act" like it is fun.
What a ridiculous joke. Hollywood's revamp is filling the area with really misguided stuff. This is so trashy.
Douche-tastic -- that's a great word. I'll have to help spread it.
David Apr 6th 2010 11:23AM
I am still convinced that this policy is stupid! If I were managing the W brand, I would fire the general manager who made that stupid non-apology (by the way, he was "too busy" to meet with me when I was there to complain about this policy, even though he strolled right pass me like he was some sort of celebrity).
Albert Apr 7th 2010 12:41AM
Most pool parties in LA suck compared to those in Miami or Vegas. It's mostly crappy music and crappy people. ( Who smokes in a pool these days? Maybe I'm getting too old for these parties. )
Thanks for the heads up. I'll stick to the Standard in Downtown.
Hippy HillBilly Apr 6th 2010 1:25PM
Damn, you people sure do spend a lot of money for a Hotel. I had an argument with the manager of a Motel 6 because when I was a kid, they were only 6 bucks a night. He actually had the nerve to laugh.
What is this world coming to? Don't they have anymore cardboard boxes in the alleys of Hollywood anymore?
HH
Not Visiting Again Apr 6th 2010 11:47AM
This has been the status-quo in Waikiki for many years Dukes restaurant had taken over the pool area. You are denied pool access and the smokers will kill you with second hand smoke. There is no notification while booking or in your room. We don't stay there any more. Profits are more important than people. Outrigger Hotels & Resorts: Outrigger Waikiki on the Beach? The only pool at Outrigger Waikiki is unusable by guests starting around 4PM and it's 85 degrees. No discount for guests to subsidize Dukes. So the W is just copying a long standing theme from Hawaii.
Tara Apr 6th 2010 11:57AM
This pool looks like my version of hell. It is hard to fathom that these people are waiting on line and paying top dollar for a place that looks overcrowded with tools.
WCM Apr 6th 2010 11:59AM
I work for a hotel, the policy is the same there. You cannot get into the club or the poolside if your not on the guest list. people stay at these hotels for the amenties that you cant get inot
caramella butterscotch Apr 6th 2010 12:17PM
My husband and I love going to West Hollywood for fun and love staying in nice hotels. The W will certainly NOT be among our choices. Unbelievable how rude the W is to it's guests.