Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
The W Hollywood won't let guests use its pool

In what must be a first for a big hotel, the W Hollywood is telling guests they are not permitted to use the rooftop pool.
It seems ludicrous, but it's true. That's because Starwood, which owns the combination hotel/residence property at Hollywood and Vine, contracted a slew of hotel services out to third parties. Drai's, a Las Vegas nightspot promotion outfit, opened on March 17, and was charged with nightlife at the W, too, presumably because the hotel wanted to purchase some off-the-shelf cachet with hipsters rather than earning it through the merits of the product.
I found this out, of course, the worst way a guest can: By staying there, and being denied access to a swim. On a recent 85-degree Sunday, I tried taking the elevator to the rooftop pool (called WET) for some of those famous California rays. After all, my room on the 11th floor was literally thumping with the beats coming through the ceiling, and I wanted to enjoy a little of this party that I had to put up with despite paying $230 a night.
I'm a reporter at heart, though, and undeterred, I skulked up a service elevator with a friend. I paid $10 to bribe a staff member to let us into what Drai's publicizes as a "sexy poolside affair with House music and Hollywood's elite."
Drai's is dreadful. There wasn't a spare inch. A DJ blasted beats, pneumatic girls danced laconically as they stood on the cushioned lounge chairs, and shirtless boys in fedoras smoked cigarettes in the pool while they scoped the girls' bikini bottoms from shin level. My friend glanced around and proclaimed it "a douche-tacular." Nearby was a big empty table marked "reserved." We were told we couldn't be seated there because "it's the owner's table." It was like this all day, from 10am to 10pm, exclusive of guests unless they greased the right palm.
A luxe L.A. hotel without a pool is like a wedding without a cake. A banquet without forks. A pretentious product without a shred of class.
Am I willing to praise a hotel when it does something right? Only too willing. The W has a lively lobby bar, supremely comfortable beds, and the Sanctuary, an octopus-like device that can charge almost anything you have, is a lifesaver. The views of the Capitol Records building and downtown L.A. are unobstructed, and the staff, although saddled with defending a misguided policy, is accommodating and professional.
That same hotel staff, by the way, is generally mortified by the arrangement with Drai's. One member told me, confidentially, she was sick of having to be "on the front lines" for Starwood's greedy scheme. She said half her weekend was spent soothing the fury of rebuffed guests. She also complained about one drunk girl who, just the day before, had vomited in the designstudio-created lobby. "This isn't Vegas," the staffer astutely pointed out. "A lot of dedicated business travelers stay with us. They don't want this."
I have a sinking feeling this trend won't be unusual in the future. People are making a lot of money off the W's cynical elitism. It's a short-sighted victory for Starwood, though, because such Vegas shenanigans will only turn off regular customers, and when the hotel's It Factor goes off the boil, its alienated customer base won't be likely to return.
Thanks to the travel industry's ever-escalating addiction to extra fees and thirst for found money, greed is elbowing aside even the inclination to provide the simplest amenities.
Jim McPartlin, W Hollywood's general manager, gave this non-apology for excluding guests from its pool:
"We have been absolutely overwhelmed by the response we have received from guests since we opened our doors 2 months ago. With the opening of Drai's Hollywood on 17th March, the interest in the hotel has increased beyond our wildest dreams, and as such we are having to limit guest access to the WET Deck and Drai's.....we simply cannot keep up with the demand! We are aware that operationally this is causing problems for some of our guests and we are working very closely with our partners to come up with a solution that works for everyone."
Update: The furor caused by our exposé caused the hotel to revise its policy. Click here for the story behind that, including an apology by McPartlin.
Gallery: Top Ten Strangest Hotel Guest Requests
Filed under: North America, United States, Hotels and Accommodations











Reader Comments (Page 2 of 4)
David S. Apr 3rd 2010 3:40PM
John --- "christian conservatism" at its best. What a hoot - no doubt you will bend your knee in church this fine Easter Sunday and pretend to be a good Christian....yawn....the real you is just filled with hatred. I hope you find some peace soon.
Erin Apr 3rd 2010 11:10AM
Yep, I am most definitley cancelling my reservation, as is the rest of my bridal party.
Vanessa Apr 3rd 2010 11:06AM
HAHAHA--the "W" Hollywood is not "West Hollywood" you MORON--"W" is the name of the hotel, and it's in the center of HOLLYWOOD
Angiebaby Apr 3rd 2010 11:11AM
Face it, man. The upscale hotels can earn a mint by hiring a DJ, inviting a few prostitutes, demanding a cover charge, and letting the rich kids spend money they didn't make on booze & floozies they otherwise couldn't get in their dreams. Old farts like us can forget about swimming. Gray hair & love handles put a damper on the scene. We just have to get rooms with really big tubs and bring our rubber duckies....
Just Me Apr 3rd 2010 11:27AM
Not surprising coming from Starwood. I got married at a Sheraton Hotel, also owned by Starwood. At the same time as my wedding they hosted a swinging singles convention. It was hosted by Hedonism. Both events were on the same floor. My nephew witnessed a man going into the ladies room with two ladies. The same restroom my guests used. After my wedding, my guests were denied access to the bar area because of the other event. In the morning my guests were also denied access to the pool area because of the other event. There were naked people everywhere, not something I need to see at my wedding. Hubby and I were also denied the use of the suite we paid for in our wedding package so the other event could have it as their fantasy suite. I could care less how people live their lives, but a corporation like Sheraton and Starwood shoudl think about what they are doing before it is done.
Bottom line, they could give two s**ts about their customers, all they care about is the money in their bank account.
Nancy Apr 3rd 2010 11:37AM
The hotel owners greed in the short run will be their downfall in the long run. Our family travels frequently and after reading this, we will be cautious wherever we stay and insure that amenities advertised are available for guests. Stupid business move for Starwood.
kidbullets Apr 3rd 2010 12:11PM
These "special" people are legends in their own minds.....too bad they can't see how ridiculous they appear to 99% of "the general public". Starwood: Do the math....your future going to look bleak when some A-hole overdoses and it hits the headlines.......
Jack Apr 3rd 2010 12:17PM
To start with Gadling, should look at the page before they post it, when they cover half the page with an ad, says little about them.
If a hotel did something like that to me, they would be off the list for ever getting another visit.
Paying that price for a room, can't use the pool. The traveling public has been taken, the air lines charge for every thing except the air you breath on the plane, the hotel charge a big bundle and then give half the service. The american public put us with this because we will not stand up and say no. Don't use these places, find other ways to travel.
Business travelers don't need these high cost places, all they need is a nice clean room where they can get a good night sleep. Stay way from these places where they want to make money with all the extra partying.
pat Apr 3rd 2010 12:50PM
Can't read the article, MORON! You've covered it up with advertising that won't close.
Gram Apr 3rd 2010 1:02PM
Dave, Harrah's pool is open during the day from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. for the hotel guests, no charge. At night it is turned into a club which does have a cover charge as they have DJ's and entertainment. I have been staying at Harrah's for over 5 years now and will most certainly continue to stay there and enjoy the pool.
Gram Apr 3rd 2010 1:06PM
Sorry, wrong Dave.
Amber Apr 3rd 2010 1:07PM
Welcome to plastic land (So Cal). The lack of class is why I will never live there. Fake bodies (mannequins on display), flashy trashy people (brainless partiers), celebrities (who gives a shit), VIP attitudes (the rest of us are evidently worthless). The idea that anyone is more important than anyone else is ridiculous and for an upscale hotel to treat its guests like this is beyond me. We have lost all morality in this country and the media/Hollywood carries the vast majority of the blame.
Give me San Francisco, Napa, North Coast, Berkeley. It is sophisticated, educated and class.
Jennifer Apr 4th 2010 5:14AM
What exactly does your little diatribe have to do with the article? Do you believe that nightclubs only exist in Hollywood? That only this hotel, part of a nationwide chain, has anything to do with the media? Frankly, your point is nonsensical. There are clubs all over the country that are manned by bouncers who pick and choose who is allowed entry. I can only guess what you mean by morality.
Let me also venture a guess that you found Gadling through AOL, right? Gadling, please terminate your agreement with AOL and take your articles off its front page. Your loyal readers will still know where to find you.
Chris Apr 4th 2010 5:06PM
Don't confuse Hollywood with the rest of LA. There's a douchy neighborhood in every city. I live on the Eastside laid back 'hood called Echo Park that's as un-Hollywood as you can get.
You know the only thing worse than Hollywood douchbaggary? Northern California elitism. I could smell that sh*t all the way back east before I moved here.
Rtharp Apr 3rd 2010 1:10PM
I've stayed there a few years back it was real nice and had more so of an up scale client base, I spent about a month there at a cost of 5000.00 I would not go back if I had to put up with being denied access as a guest of the hotel.
The hotel was under other management if i'm correct, the pool and tennis courts are all on the roof so if you not allowed to get to the pool your also not allowed to get to the courts
Bummer
dillon Apr 3rd 2010 1:38PM
It isnt the first. The Mondrian on sunset blvd does this too, you have to get past a door-jerk with a clipboard to access the pool/pool bar, hotel guests are often turned away. it varies by day/time of day etc, you don't know if/when you'll get to visit the pool deck or when you'll be told to f/off. Inside, you can have a 20 dollar drink and look at some trashy looking people, The Hollywood Roosevelt did the vegas-pool scene thing when they opened during the paris hilton mania. they got tons of press (tabloid, not travel), it was ultra douchey and packed (for a while), but the stigma of 'party hotel' turned a LOT of people off, no one i know has ever stayed there more than once. Now it is a 'no go' zone, the few times i've had to go in there it looked like a porn convention was in town. (maybe it was?). Sounds like W Hollywood is on the same road.
The W brand has some very good hotels (like the one in westwood) and some very irritating, stupid hotels that seem to be more interested in selling booze than beds. I've stayed in several W properties and am pretty much over it, i wont take the chance. nice photos on their sites but the reality is too often unfriendly design and sleep deprivation. If you want a really good, service oriented luxury hotel in LA where the actual vip's and celebrities are (with guests/guests-of guests-only pools of course) try the Sunset Marquis and the Chateau Marmont. real deal.
QuelleFromage Apr 3rd 2010 7:45PM
The W Hollywood is exactly the opposite of cool. It's a new place to go for the desperate and trashy folks who give LA a bad name. No A-listers here- no celebs- overweight people in too-tight Forever 21. It's so declassé it's absolutely stunning, and kinda funny for about five minutes.
Greg Apr 4th 2010 2:25PM
With respect to angry guests, it sounds like Jim McPartlin is "taking this very seriously."
ryan Apr 4th 2010 5:14PM
This place sounds so unprofessional, can't see it being in business long if this is the way it treats people.
http://www.scotlandhereandnow.com/
Anth Apr 4th 2010 7:08PM
I think the more hip and popular a hotel sets out to be, the less services they feel the need to offer.
Example: I stayed at the Marriott in Cambridge Mass, specifically because they have a kick-a$$ pool and hot tube. But when I arrived, I found the entire health spa was closed for renovations.
So when I returned from my stay, I wrote a letter to them about this, how I wasn't informed services would be limited when I made my reservation, and my stay was impacted accordingly.
The result: they sent me a letter apologizing for the inconvenience and a coupon for a free weekend stay.
THAT'S how you run a hotel.