Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Maine ski resort to charge for backcountry rescues
Sugarloaf Mountain, a popular ski resort located in Maine, has had enough of skiers and snowboarders going out of bounds and then requiring a rescue. In fact, they're so fed up, that following two recent incidences, they have decided to charge the snowboarders who were rescued for the expenses incurred during the operation. The two incidences in question took place on Friday, February 26th and the following Monday, March 1st. In both cases, snowboarders elected to ignore warning signs and fence lines, to leave Sugarloaf property and move onto privately held lands. When they became lost, search parties needed to be organized, with volunteer firefighters and Sugarloaf search and rescue teams going into action.
The first rescue involved five snowboarders, and cost a total of $2300 spread out between the local fire department and the resort. At $460 each, these boarders are getting off on the cheap side however, as the second rescue operation required the extraction of four out-of-bounds offenders, and extended to 15 hours in length. As a result, the tab came to just over $8350 or $2087.50 each. That makes for an expensive day out on the slopes.
All told, about 500 man hours were spent on the search and rescue operations, which convinced both Sugarloaf, and the Carrabassett Valley Fire Department, that they would send the bill to the people that were rescued. They argued that the snowboarders made a conscious choice to go out of bounds, and as a result, they would have to be held responsible for their own actions. Perhaps a big fat bill in the mail will help convince them to stay on the proper slopes next time.
Filed under: Skiing, North America, United States












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
p curley Mar 9th 2010 4:59PM
DSounds fair enough to me. If they intentionally or with gross negligence caused this then they should pay. I would go as far as charging all 5 the entire maount, not dividing it in half, as it would have cost the same, even if it were one person. Of course, I would collect the entire amout just once. This would insure that it would all get paid if one were able to pay and the others weren't. Joint and several liability. Just like a joint income tax liability, or a partnership liability.
gifford Mar 9th 2010 7:39PM
good!
dave Mar 9th 2010 6:03PM
I have lived in western ski towns for most of my life and every year there seem to be more and more idiots that think they should ski whatever they want with no training, or safety equipment. These rescuers have to risk their lives because of some morons. Charge them- heck, throw them in jail.
Jim Mar 9th 2010 10:12PM
As a 20 SAR member I say YES charge these morons. Most of them do not have the gear or knowledge to be out of bounds.
Greg Mar 9th 2010 6:55PM
We have the same type of thing here in Mich.snowmobilers and ice fisherman that go out on thin ice or ice flows Charge them to the fullest.......................
tfarnon Mar 9th 2010 7:57PM
Sounds fair to me. That said, I usually don't need a compass, a map or a GPS even in the back country because I'm lucky enough to have a great sense of direction. It doesn't mean I don't go out without a map and compass, plus a small assortment of "just in case" items whether I'll be travelling by car, on skis, or on foot. Living in the Northern Nevada teaches you to never underestimate the weather and nature. Ever.