Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Toronto,
Puerto Rico.
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2012 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-05-2010 @ 11:24AM
Kent Wien said...
Hi Nick,
I've never been convinced that the minor sterile cockpit violations caused the Colgan accident. They were silent for the two minutes before the deceleration, as I discussed here:
http://www.gadling.com/2009/05/25/plane-answers-chit-chat-did-not-doom-colgan-flight-3407/
As for the NTSB's recommendation that the FAA monitor our conversations, I'd really hate to have to be the person going through those tapes.
We operate under a "Flight Operations Quality Assurance" or FOQA at our airline. This program records all the parameters of the flight and if any limitations are exceeded or the approach isn't stabilized during the last 1,000 feet, we get a call from a 'gatekeeper' who is the only one that knows our identity. He records the circumstances on the flight and passes it along to someone who tracks the trends at the airline.
There would have to be some rock solid assurances that the voice data wouldn't be released and anonymity could be maintained. Even so, there would still be pilots vehemently opposed to the plan.