Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-11-2010 @ 11:27AM
Can't Trust Frontline said...
Why is Mark's comment so faded that it is barely readable? Maybe because he doesn't agree with the Frontline conclusion, and therefore the blogger's conclusion?
Thre was so much spin in that Frontline report that people should be dizzy from watching it. Using 'experts' such as a plaintiff's attorney, slanting questions in a way that were seemed to be intended to make one side's point of view better than the others, interviewing a couple of pilots who seemed to have axes to grind, cueing in music during interviews that clearly seems intended to influence your gut reaction to somthing, Miles O'Brien's (the reporter for Frontline) demeanor changing depending on who he was interviewing, and on and on and on. This wasn't a fact-based report; it was meant to garner attention and ratings.