Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-07-2010 @ 6:24PM
Scott b Kaley said...
Aviation is inherently unforgiving... it doesn't matter if you are a physician or if your last name is Kennedy or how much or little wealth you have accrued. The fact remains that the crew of this aircraft crashed a perfectly airworthy airplane certfied and capable of continued flight. The airplane did not crash itself. The notion of a "reasonably experience" Captain is utter hogwash. The anecdotal evidence that the crew was actually quite terrified of the hazardous conditions they encountered is indicated by CVR comments and overuse of the autopilot during the approach phase in icing conditions contrary to the Q400 POH and company policy, which recommends hand flying the airplane in icing conditions. Good, old fashioned stick skills. Moreover, the inexperienced FO, by her own admission, had never seen hard IFR in icing conditions according to the CVR. The outcome is tragic and completely unacceptable. Unfortunately,the buck stops with the Captain's seat, even with any credible extenuating circumstances. At the end of the day, there is never any excuse worthy of the aftermath and human tragedy that follows an event like this accident. As a career veteran aviator myself, it a tough nut to swallow, but, nonetheless, it is still ours to stomach.
Reply
2-07-2010 @ 9:36PM
Chuck said...
Experience and aeronautical decision making skills cannot be taught nor gained in training classes and limited simulator sessions alone. The First Officer on this flight served only as a distraction in the cockpit. The sterile cockpit rule was grossly violated by this crew and the auto-pilot was in use when it should not have been , the flight crew was without doubt suffering from fatigue and in the case of the First Officer fear of her lack of experience. We all know she should not have been in that aircraft with such limited experience. Her words on the transcipt detail the problem with regional airline hiring practices. The Q400 and other large turboprop aircraft of its type are not the appropriate place to build flight time and experience. Why not? Because of the large number of innocent lives of the unaware victims carried in the passenger cabin.The FAA can reduce accidents like this by simply mandating higher pilot experience levels, expecially in the right seat. An experienced, skilled, professional FO is the ultimate cockpit resource available to the Captain, not the auto-pilot.
2-08-2010 @ 4:34AM
Ed Samulski said...
You are totally correct in your comments. The Captain is the ruler of the ship and it is the fault of the captain if anything goes wrong. Having said that I feel the need to address the issue of fatigue and lack of sleep. A good captain would have called in sick, knowing that it might end their career with that airline company. The company that fired such a captain would have been losing a good captain. With todays emphasis on pleasing the stockholder and screwing the passenger this is only going to happen over and over again.
The old school pilots would give up the job rather than kill the passengers, never have thought a moment about it, just tell the airline they needed more sleep, and if the airline could not wrap their minds around that they could just find a new ( unskilled, willing to kill the passengers rather than admit they where tired ) pilot.
2-08-2010 @ 9:25AM
Kent Wien said...
Do you have any reference to the POH autopilot restriction in icing conditions?
I ask only because the NTSB made no mention of it in their report. You'd think they would have addressed that one if true.
http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2010/AAR1001.htm