Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Air Canada ordered to offer a no-nuts option for allergic flyers
The Canadian Transportation Authority has ruled that Air Canada needs to create a "nut-free" zone on all of its flights, to accommodate those passengers who are severely allergic to nuts. The order came after two passengers complained that the airline had failed to properly accommodate their allergies, which the CTA ruled should be treated as a disability. According to Toronto's National Post, the airline has "30 days to come up with a plan to create a 'buffer zone'" to separate those who have nut allergies from the rest of the passengers, who may receive a snack with nuts in it.
I feel for people who have severe nut allergies, really I do. The constant worry that something you eat may contain nuts, the fear that someone may eat a nut near you and cause you to have a bad reaction, the pain of not being able to enjoy all the delicious nuts out there in the world. I mean, have you ever had a macadamia nut? Those things are pure heaven.
Should passengers be denied the right to eat something delicious because there is a chance that another person on the plane might be allergic to it? It's tempting to say no, but really, when you think about it, is offering a peanut-based snack so important that it is worth risking someone's life? Some allergies really are that severe and there are plenty of other snack options out there that don't involve nuts. I actually have to side with one of the complaining passengers on this one - it just makes more sense to get ride of nut-based snacks altogether.
[via USA Today]
Filed under: North America, Canada, Airlines













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Bert Jan 9th 2010 4:59PM
What if someone brings a pack of nuts on the plane so that they can eat without paying for food? How is that going to be controlled? Will airlines institute a no-outside-food policy? To take matter further, wouldn't all nut sales need to be banned, at least past security, both at restaurants and convenience stores? Add to that mandatory (supervised) hand washing and tooth brushing in the jet-way?
I fly to Moncton and Sept-Iles, Canada. Both routes see many passengers bringing back fresh seafood, often in the cabin. Moncton even sells live lobsters at the terminal. Should that practice be banned?
I have an idea, why don't those with allergies bring an EpiPen or two with them, and accept responsibility for their situation.
Why can't they be required to make a fat-person zone or a long-legged person zone to accommodate people afflicted with those conditions?
Nick Jan 9th 2010 10:21PM
Couldn't agree more Bert!
Another possibility maybe a total ban on all food products that contain peanut (even trace).. some folks would be surprised at how many items have peanut as an ingredient.. someone will need to read the labels on all packaging before the boarding.. or better still, a total ban on all food on planes will bypass that need!
Allergic people need to realize that air travel is a PUBLIC form of transportation, and like any public space, you cannot encroach upon the freedom of the MAJORITY of the public who use that space. If anyone is so concerned, make your own personal travel arrangements, but do not tell others (the MAJORITY) what they can and cannot eat in a PUBLIC space.
In fact, I would personally respect the concerns of someone sitting around me in a plane and will do everything to accommodate their needs if so requested; but imposing totalitarian regulations on me is a sure way to antagonize me.
saints18 Jan 10th 2010 1:11AM
You are right Bert, those who have an allergy should be vigilant about it. But carrying an epi-pen isnt enough---the point of an epi-pen isnt to 'cure you', but to buy you 20mins-30mins to get you to a hospital so you get emergency treatment and medication. Factor that into a possible 4or 5 hour flight, and it really could mean life or death for some people
Lisa Feb 9th 2010 7:47PM
I am the mother of a boy with potentially fatal food allergies. He has reacted during air travel. I can't believe the insensitivity of some the people who have replied here. Would you really want to be responsible for a person's death on a plane just because you had to eat your precious peanuts? Sounds like entitlement and lack of impulse control to me. Two Epi-pen shots will NOT NECESSARILY save a person's life, especially on a plane where it may take hours before getting the person to a hospital. Before you comment, try to wear the other person's hat.
Richard Jan 9th 2010 5:27PM
Long-legged person zone? I'd love it.
Kelly Jan 10th 2010 4:14PM
Id love a child-free zone, myself.
Lisa Feb 9th 2010 7:48PM
I'd love a Bert-free zone