Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Is the body scanner hysteria getting a little out of hand?
With terrorists now hiding bomb components in all corners of their bodies, we now find ourselves at a difficult impasse between more advanced, 3D scanning and passengers' privacy. Pit the ACLU and the TSA against one another and one is guaranteed a lifetime of bureaucracy, litigation and name calling, nothing of which puts the traveler's mind at ease.
technologies available for 3D scanning, but will anything really show your buck-naked body to a nefarious TSA worker? Drudge Report and bild.de seem to suggest so, showing an attractive woman in full 3D detail on both of their sites.Further complicating the matter is the buzz on the internet purporting that the negative of the exact same image reveals the person unclothed. The image above on the right was taken from Drudge this morning, while that below is the negative image as processed by Photoshop.
But is the above image real collected data? Not one other picture on the web from an x-ray or microwave scanner yields the same result, and most of them are so muddled and blurry (as a 3D microwave/x-ray scan should be) that it's impossible to pick out fine details. Gadling's friend and Photoshop expert proffered this alternative mechanism, suggesting the image is fake:
Whether or not the image is manufactured or not, this whole concept of 3D scanning just needs to be accepted. More and more airports are installing the devices, which means at some point in your travel career, some sad TSA worker is probably going to see what's going on under your sweater. Better start toning up with your Shake Weight now.The girl was backlit, then they take the color out and blur the edges, and then invert the color. Either her top is skintight, or she wasn't wearing clothes at all, and those were added in a separate layer.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Bernard Jan 9th 2010 4:14AM
It was a fake. Someone on Gizmodo posted the original stock photo that was used.
NSFW Link
http://www.photoalto.com/index/fa/c.image/pid/PAA246000018
Claudine Jan 9th 2010 8:24AM
I'm not worried either way. We are all basically the same.
http://www.korea-diva.com
A Poster Jan 9th 2010 10:25PM
One apparent limitation of these devices is that they cannot penetrate body cavities such as the excretory and the female reproductive cavities. It will not be long before a terrorist conceals hazardous devices in either of these cavities. After such an incident occurs, the TSA will likely require travelers to squat and cough while being scanned in one of these devices. Squatting and coughing will dislodge any artificial material being concealed inside either of these cavities, such that it will be revealed to the TSA officer who monitors the nude images on the screen. The fact that Americans seem quite willing to submit to any indignities that the TSA imposes upon them makes it likely that there will be little resistance to this procedure, which is routine during strip searches at prisons and jails. The TSA will certainly emphasize that no clothing will have to be removed (at least during the initial screening), and that the person who monitors the nude images is out of sight.
joebob Jan 31st 2010 9:42AM
adds a new meaning to the teenage prank of lighting farts, i remember some good ones that in the dark were methane blue, and we will have to watch for hot sex on the plane now for sure, no flames on the dude! Can two lesbians light one off? What about taking a vibrator on board and those drink mixers look a lot like vibrators. maybe a good reason to outlaw putting your phone on vibrating, no phones with a vibrator for the ladies.