Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
BREAKING NEWS: Possible new TSA rules in effect after terror attempt
After yesterdays terrorist bomb attempt on a Northwest Airlines flight, it was only a matter of time until the government came up with new rules designed to "keep us safe". Air Canada has published these rules, though the TSA has not officially released them yet, so it remains a possibility that someone jumped the gun.
The new rules a going to be horrible to deal with - passengers will no longer be allowed to get up out of their seat for the final hour of a flight. You will also be prohibited from accessing your carry-on items during this period or from holding any items in your lap.
This is potentially a big one - it means you can't use your laptop, read a book or magazine, or even grab a toy or bottle of water during the final 60 minutes of your flight. If true - this is a massive inconvenience for all passengers, all based off one terror attempt that should have been prevented if terror watch list measures had been properly followed.
In the coming days we'll most likely hear more from the TSA on these new rules, and whether the "final hour" rule is indeed a new hassle we'll need to deal with. Obviously, we'll keep you updated when we hear more. In the meantime - if you are abroad, and plan to fly to the United States, be prepared for long delays and multiple security screenings.
Chalk this up to another win for the terrorists - even though they (thankfully) did not manage to blow anything up, they will once again forever change the way we travel.
UPDATE: We're hearing rumors that electronics are being banned from international flights traveling to the U.S., and that passengers flying into the US are limited to one handheld bag per person.
UPDATE 2: For those wondering how Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab got past security, the explosive device apparently had no metal parts, and the individual pieces were sewn into Abdulmutallab's underwear.
UPDATE 3: According to a memo from the TSA to US Airways, the TSA has ordered airlines to perform a "pat-down" screening of all passengers on inbound international flights, "concentrating on upper legs and torso." Chris Elliott has the full text of the memo outlining the new security measures.
UPDATE 4: Inflight entertainment has been banned on all international flights.
UPDATE 5: Police take into custody a second person after report of suspicious activity on Delta/Northwest flight 253 from Amsterdam, only two days after the Abdulmutallab incident.
UPDATE 6: The "suspicious activity" by the second person, also a Nigerian, was locking himself inside the airplane's lav. No actual explosive device was discovered on the flight.
UPDATE 7: As of December 28 at 8am EST, electronics are still allowed on international flights, despite reports to the contrary. As of this update, the TSA has not updated its website with anything more specific than,
UPDATE 8: It looks as though the new international flight rules will be in effect through December 30, 2009. It's unclear at this time if they'll remain in effect into 2010.Passengers flying into the United States from abroad can expect to see additional security measures at international airports such as increased gate screening including pat-downs and bag searches. During flight, passengers will be asked to follow flight crew instructions, such as stowing personal items, turning off electronic equipment and remaining seated during certain portions of the flight.
UPDATE 9: Two passengers, "described as Middle Eastern, [who] were acting strangely and talking loudly to each other in a foreign language" were detained yesterday after a flight from Orlando to Phoenix. Questioning and a search of their belongings turned up nothing suspicious, and the men were released.
UPDATE 10: Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano admitted this morning that airline security failed in allowing a Nigerian on a terror watch list and allegedly armed with explosives onto a Detroit-bound flight. This comes only 24 hours after her insistence previously that "the system worked."
UPDATE 11: Our inside source in the industry now reports that inflight entertainment has been restored as well as the ability to move about the cabin inside of an hour to landing.












Reader Comments (Page 2 of 2)
Steve Dec 28th 2009 8:46AM
@Sasha:
Your comments indicate to me that you are exactly the non-critical-thinker that these rules are aimed at appeasing.. You're all for the rules, but tell me, how is it that not letting me go to the bathroom during the last hour of flight, and not letting me have a blanket during the last hour of flight going to make you any safer? Wouldn't a terrorist simply do his work during an earlier phase of flight, or NOT follow the rules?
How is it helpful that a toddler can't drink from their bottle during the last hour of flight? Is that going to help? Having flown with toddlers, I can tell you that drinking from a bottle during descent can help aleviate the pain in their heads caused by the altitude changes during the descent and landing. Babies dont understand, and this is just ridiculous and cruel to the baby and the parent.
The way these rules seem to have been devised, they're akin to prohibiting red cars on a specific road, because yesterday, a red car got into an accident on that road.. It doesn't solve the problem, but it sure complicates the rules for all drivers of red cars.
The problem is, in this case, we're all "in red cars" and the rules stand to tie our hands and limit our freedoms, while doing absolutely NOTHING to provide real safety. It makes air travel more expensive, less convenient, take longer, all while frustrating passengers and providing you with a false sense of security and hurting the aviation industry.
I'd LOVE to hear how you feel that some of these rules are actually making us safer in the air...
-Steve
The Tim Channel Dec 28th 2009 6:38AM
Surely the folks who are leaning toward train travel can't be unaware that the same risk of terror applies to trains as well?
Enjoy.
Steve Dec 28th 2009 8:59AM
Of course they're unaware of that.. Nothing bad has happened on a train (yet, in this country) so obviously trains are safe.
In our current security model, we only apply idiotic and useless security measures to things that have already happened. Once a train gets hit by a terrorist, we'll require equally useless measures on trains as well, not letting you get out of your seat, not letting you bring shampoo with you, and not letting you have a blanket because those are all things that terrorists have already done.
We need to realize... Terrorists dont play by the rules of our "civilized" society.. I would ask that everyone think back to their days in elementary school, when you learned about how a small number of American "freedom fighters" defeated large numbers of well equipped "red coats". They complained that we didn't fight "fair", we didn't take a tea at 3:00, and we didn't line up in square grids and march straight into them. We hid in the forests, shot them from behind, and won the war, one shot at a time. Now, the terrorists are doing the same thing, and rather than adjusting, we're complaining that they dont "fight by the rules".
Remember, history is written by the winner... If the terrorists win, they will be the "freedom fighters" in the new history books.
-Steve
Oz Dec 28th 2009 8:53AM
My most recent flight had me landing just before midnight last night. I noticed absolutely no difference in rules or treatment of passengers from other flights taken in recent months.
Electronics were in use except during takeoff and landing, as always.
People used blankets during flights, including during the last hour of the flight, as always. I used my jacket to cover my lap for the entire duration of the flight.
Security lines and procedures seemed exactly the same as before. Lines were not long and moved as quickly/slowly as ever. Most people were neither searched nor patted down.
But thanks for perpetuating the internet rumor machine that has so many people paranoid about so many completely untrue and unsubstantiated rumors. I'll now return to reading about how the new health care bill will have me put to death in a fiery furnace at the whim of Kim Jong Il. Keep up the good work.
Sean Dec 30th 2009 7:32AM
I agree that this is a reactive solution rather than a preventative measure. You can expect that every situation will be similar on the next one. What if the next bomber has his inside a ballcap or hat? NO HATS! What if he gets convincing makeup and dresses like an overweight person and hides it in the prosthetics? NO OVERWEIGHT PEOPLE ON BOARD!
To play devils advocate though what else can we do? Screen every passenger that goes on board? Work on a new device that performs every scan known to man on every passenger? You would have to arrive 3 hours early just to get through screening. What about singling out a specific ethnic/religious group? Now were trampling on the rights of a specific group.
The sad fact is that after 9/11 everyone was demanding answers from the airlines as to why they didn't do more to prevent this. People demanded all these measures to be put into effect to protect people. I remember the news anchors saying "Could more have been done to prevent this attack". The answer to this is a resounding YES! But the real question is this "Are we willing to sacrifice our freedoms or the freedoms of fellow man to prevent an attack?" If the answer is no then it isn't a question of WILL we will have another suicide bomber on a plane it will be a matter of WHEN. And then I ask you this: Do you want to be on that plane?
Sasha Dec 28th 2009 9:52AM
Steve, I am not an expert in this field, nor do you, I guess. That is the similarity between you and me. I cannot tell you how that will or will not make us safer. I know one - I want to be safe, I want you to be safe, I want innocent people to be safe. And as a wise society, we elect or employ the right people who know the exact answers of your questions. But I believe in those people, you don't. Here is the difference.
The technology is booming; and is difficult to stop the deviant minds. The terrorists and offenders will be always, always a step ahead of us. It is difficult to predict the next step. In difficult times and panic like now, the measures may seem excessive, but that all will come in the right place. We need to unite not to divide. This war is not theirs, this war is against all of us who want to live in peace. We should not be short-sighted, and think only what is going to happen if we do not drink water or go to the toilet for one hour. Babies cry, babies do not like the seat belts either but they have to be fasten. Just go to the toilet and drink water before that, no one has died of not drinking water for one hour, but people have died, as a result of terrorist activities.
I would suggest to have two categories flights - one for people who do not care and other for people who are ready to follow the rules. Please use the first option and agree that neither you or your family will take the authorities responsible of case of any terroristic events. Because trust me, our people do everything possible to prevent terrorists from entering the planes, but I leave in such area and I know their mentality and I know what they are capable of; and no one can stop them.
LA Dave Dec 28th 2009 10:41AM
Well, I got back from Paris last night but I was too tired to post.
The new security measures delayed almost all US bound international flights by about 2 hours. Every single passenger's carry on was search thoroughly and every passenger was patted down.
During the last hour of flight, we were told due to new TSA regulations we were not allowed to access any carryons, get up from our seats, have any blankets, pillows or other objects covering our laps. I don't recall hearing anything about operating electronic devices.
In flight entertainment was on during the flight but the flight location map was disabled during the entire flight.
LA Dave Dec 28th 2009 10:42AM
Well, I got back from Paris last night but I was too tired to post.
The new security measures delayed almost all US bound international flights by about 2 hours. Every single passenger's carry on was search thoroughly and every passenger was patted down.
During the last hour of flight, we were told due to new TSA regulations we were not allowed to access any carryons, get up from our seats, have any blankets, pillows or other objects covering our laps. I don't recall hearing anything about operating electronic devices.
In flight entertainment was on during the flight but the flight location map was disabled during the entire flight.
To the Oz user above: Did you fly internationally to the US or within the US? The new rules only seem to apply for US bound international flights and not to domestic flights.
Kieran Dec 28th 2009 12:34PM
Scott,
Here you are guilty of the same chop logic that the TSA are!
"Of course, since the Nigerian bomber had his bomb strapped to his legs, a hand luggage restriction seems rather useless."
The TSA make restrictions assuming that the next attempt on a plane is going to have a similar pattern to the previous attempt:
They take it to the point of the absurd with logic like: The last bomber had a blanket over his lap when he set off the bomb so ban blankets and anything on peoples laps!
The last bomber set it off in the last hour so ban everything in the last hour! (this one is particularly misguided as it seems to me that it was the opportunity to be over a US city, and in fact, higher altitude would have been more destructive - it just so happened that the flight to Detroit doesn't enter US airspace until the last 1h) etc, etc.
Unfortunately you make the same mistake above but of the form "the bomber didn't do this so why ban it"
Surely we can see that the pattern is actually "each attempt is not a carbon copy of the last" and that measures that are more indifferent to the particulars of the attempt but are all-covering, better targeted and less inconvenient for most people, would be better.
JIMMYZ Dec 28th 2009 1:39PM
New Tsa Rules . All passengers on all flights will be given an injection to put them to sleep by the flight crew before take off. Once the plane has landed and parked at the gate all passengers will be given an injection to revive them.
Andrew Dec 28th 2009 2:16PM
Ridiculous rules that will not assist in stopping terrorism. Turn the tv back on and let us use the bathrooms within the last 60-minutes. Train travel is looking better and better each day. Hurry up with the high-speed rail already in this country!
Andrew
http://blog.cheapoair.com
jps Dec 29th 2009 9:00PM
Nap should be fired. Someone else should take her place. She shouldn't be allowed to say all is well than tell everyone yah its not all hunky-doory!
I am willing to travel in boxers and a t-shirt, only if I get assurance from the airline my bag will be with me when I get off the plane.
Also the United States of Obama is beyond stupid. They should look at the way they do things in Israel at Ben Gurion.
mstaken2007 Jan 8th 2010 7:39PM
Next we will all be handcuffed to our seats for the entire flight!! lol What if your baby needs a bottle ? Does the baby just have to starve and wait till we get off the plane? yes a screaming crying baby and fussy thristy toddlers will be just nice!