Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Plane Answers: A closer look at technology in the Northwest overflight
I've had a few questions come in concerning the rather egregious error made by the Northwest pilots last week. I hesitated to discuss the incidents, since there's absolutely no defending what they did.But when my own sister Kim, asks:
"I would love to hear your opinion as to what the NWA Pilots were really doing when they "missed" MSP."
Well, for you, Kimmie, I just can't say no.
It's the topic of the week among pilots.
Speculation has been rampant, but the NTSB and FAA released some preliminary information from the pilots that has all but squashed any speculation on what exactly they were doing. The more pressing question has been, "How could it happen?"
The conversation among pilots so far has ended with claims of dismay. How did they disconnect from flying enough to lose that kind of situational awareness?
By coming clean and explaining their story, the pilots admitted to something essentially no better than falling asleep; something that took their attention from flying the airplane. And they sought to set the record straight, confess and explain what diverted their attention; I can appreciate that.
As a result, the FAA has immediately revoked their certificates.
Most notable in their story was the fact that they had their laptops out inflight. Many airlines encourage the use of laptops to access an electronic version of their flight manuals. These "EFBs" are more useful than their paper counterparts because of the quick searching capabilities a laptop offers. However, it's my understanding that Delta and Northwest don't use any EFB on board their aircraft. Regardless, the pilots admitted that they were discussing new scheduling procedures that were to take effect with their laptops, something that's prohibited even at airlines that use Class I (laptop) EFBs.
According to the NTSB, the co-pilot was more familiar with the new bidding system, called preferential bidding, which involves choosing the types of trips and the day and time of departures in a general sense instead of simply picking a month of flying from the company constructed bid sheet.

Preferential bidding takes some time to get used to, and the pilots who figure it out early are likely to enjoy an advantage for a few months over those who don't. The co-pilot was simply trying to get the captain up to speed, and this apparently was enough of a distraction to cause the crew to lose contact with ATC for well over an hour.
Missed signs
Media reports have suggested that the pilots missed repeated calls from the company and that 'bells and chimes' were sounded as the company and ATC desperately tried to contact the flight.
Those descriptions aren't entirely accurate. When the company tried to contact the pilots via ACARS there wasn't actually a chime associated with the message. There was simply a 1/4 inch tall notice on one of the forward displays on the instrument panel that a message has been received. There was no AOL style "You've got mail!" chime. Some airplanes also print any message automatically on a small and rather quiet printer.
Losing contact with air traffic control is something that can happen to any pilot. A missed radio call is followed up by another call or two before the center switches to the 121.5 emergency frequency that pilots monitor on a second radio. If both attempts fail, ATC will then call another aircraft of the same airline to have them relay a message through ACARS for the airplane to re-establish contact on whatever frequency is in use.

If no contact is made, the chatter on the radio suddenly stops, so instead of hearing bells, chimes and calls, the Northwest pilots likely heard nothing at all. Similar to parents of toddlers, pilots should recognize this ominous silence as a possible problem.
They could have received a VHF SELCAL, a tone loud enough to make you jump out of your seat if activated by ATC. However, I suspect it wasn't used in this case, since it was a similar flight attendant call that eventually led to the discovery of the gross error.
On a related side note, a small number of the airplanes I fly do have a chime sound that activates when an ACARS message is sent. But that chime is identical to the flight attendant chime, the route uplink chime, the winds uplink chime, the HF SELCAL Chime, etc... In the future, ATC instructions sent via CPDLC will even use this same chime. It becomes easier to disregard or miss those particular chimes when they're constantly being used to announce other unimportant or nuisance notices.
The Boeing engineer in charge of designing this system explained to me years ago that humans were unable to differentiate the meaning of more than five different sounds, so they elected to keep those chimes the same and rely on an added cue such as a light or message that tells the pilots what the chime represents.
Will it happen again?
Congress is already talking about measures to restrict laptops in the cockpit. These rules were already in place, and may serve only to remove the official uses of a computer, requiring pilots who currently use a Class I EFB to go back to carrying nearly twenty pounds of books in their kitbags again; a move that still won't prevent some pilot from pulling out a laptop to check their schedule.
I'll leave you with a look at the Class II EFB that Virgin America uses on their flights. Eliminating these tools would be a step backward for the industry.

Do you have a question about something related to the pointy end of an airplane? Ask Kent and maybe he'll use it for the next Plane Answers. Check out his other blog, Cockpit Chronicles and travel along with him at work.
Filed under: Plane Answers













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
JC Harbottle Oct 31st 2009 12:24PM
Best answer I've seen and probably the most accurate yet.
Thanks,
JCH
EAL, MDW, UAL
Matt Jamieson Nov 3rd 2009 3:48PM
Definitely a good explanation on what could have been going on in the cockpit. Yet, even though you mention that Boeing used only a select few sounds to notify and alert the pilots of different event/messages going on, to me, I would think even the FMS message of MCP Alt Change, or End of Route would have caught their attention. All I can think of is they were really into figuring out the new crew schedule program.
Thanks again for some insight.
Best,
Matt J.
James Nov 4th 2009 3:55AM
Well, I for one am not buying it. Not was Kent said, but what the NWA pilots declared as the cause of their potentially deadly mistake. I just don't buy it. Unless they release the CVR stating otherwise.....But I know the CVR only gives the last 30 min.....and as a side note, I think that is the stupidest thing ever put into an aircraft. Are the engineers really that challenged they cannot come up with a system that can record the entire flight? Go to Office Depot and pick up a little digital recorder, they can record for 6 hrs.....The CVR would easily tell what really happened.....This sort of thing angers me very much. They could have developed some major issues with the plane and just slept right through it. It is inexcuseable and should not be tolerated. For a severe failure of control and management in the cockpit with however many lives on board I think it's borderline criminal. Had that plane gone down and your kids were on it.....does a silly license(s) revocation seem fitting? This sort of thing cannot happen...laptop / no laptop -- sleeping / not sleeping the net result is the same. The public entrust their lives and their families lives to an airline - a plane manu - a flight crew and it just is horific that no one was home for over an hour or so......IMO, this is worse than when the SWA pilot overran 08.
StraightTailDriver Dec 9th 2009 9:49PM
First off- love your columns, just recently found 'Cockpit Chronicles' while geeking out on YouTube videos.
Regarding the message chime in Boeings, the engineer said people can't differentiate between more than 5 sounds?!
Really? As a musician I find this quite hard to believe!
In any case, then why not have up to 5 different chimes - w/ tones escalating in urgency the matter at hand?
Thankfully an ILS approach has at max 3 different tones! LOL
Keep up the good work and keep the shiny side up!
Kent Wien Dec 9th 2009 9:51PM
Thanks. I agree completely. At the very least, give us five different sounds. And some of the non-essential noises (winds uplink, route uplink, etc.) can certainly be eliminated.
Raphaël Dec 27th 2009 8:14PM
Great answer on that one!
I think using an EFB in a cockpit is the greatest step fwd in our daily ops. Those jepp charts are a crazy stuff to update, especially for international ops!! Just plug a CD in and the update is done!
Nice blog by the way, lots of informative stuff!
Take care
Raph, LSGG ;-)