Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
The TSA took my baby story: The relationship between psychology, customer service and traveling with a young one
After watching the TSA video of the mother blogger who claimed in a post on her blog "My Bottle's Up" that a TSA agent temporarily took her baby son out of her sight during the security screening process at the Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson airport, I had thoughts about TSA security screening.
Katie wrote a post about this incident earlier today, but there are other points worth making, particularly when considering factors that helped create this partly true, partly fabricated TSA vs. passenger story--even if the fabrications may not have been intentional.
There are a couple of details about this incident that indicate that perhaps TSA still has a bit of work to do when it comes to perfecting customer service and truly understanding human psychology and behavior.
Although I've been generally impressed with most TSA agents, there are times when it has been clear to me that bad practices can have adverse effects.
Here are points that came to mind when I looked into this latest TSA vs. passenger story:
1. People who are flying are consumers. They've paid for a flight. That means they have expectations of being able to catch their flights. This can produce anxiety if expectations and reality are not matching up when TSA's security measures become cumbersome, time-consuming and seem ridiculous.
2. A person flying alone with a young child has a bit of paraphernalia to deal with. Along with the child, consider the stroller, bottle, diaper bag, and various objects the caregiver has brought along to keep the child happy. It's enough of a process to get belongings for one person ready for security. Add in the rigmarole it takes to take a child through the security check, and there's potential for more anxiety.
3. TSA is a government entity that has all the power at a security check. Regardless that most TSA agents are splendid and do their jobs with the highest professionalism, there are jerks--not many, but there are some.
Plus, there are passengers who have had bad experiences with authority figures--or have anxiety about authority figures. There's something about going through security that can make even the most law abiding citizens worry.
4. When the mother did get red flagged for a security check because the alarm went off, she was put, along with her child, in a clear box-like room with Plexiglas walls. That seems like a recipe for high anxiety. Why wasn't she checked as soon as she beeped? Why the box-like room? The more I watched her in the room, the more anxious I felt. She was stuck until someone made a move.
First, there she is holding a young child and being ignored. Watch how many times her hand goes up as she's trying to get someone's attention. Watch how her feet are shifting. She's having problems. Certainly it's not rocket science to know that people with young children don't really need to be put in a box-like room without knowing how long they'll need to wait in it, if at all. Frankly, making people wait before getting the wand feels like a bit of a power play to me.
5. When you are stuck in a box- like room, but the others around you are able to go about their merry way, it can make you feel even worse. While the woman is in the room with her child, others are passing through security without a hitch. Why wouldn't this put her on edge? Or is the role of TSA really about testing our patience?
6. Even when she was finally checked, the process was maddeningly slow. She was then taken over to sit in a chair for an even longer amount of time. For some reason TSA kept talking to her. I can imagine the "Yoooouuur in a huuurrryyy arrre yyyyouuuuu? Trying to catch a flight? This will teach you a lesson about trying to get TSA to hurry, and I'd watch the attitude, Lady."
Running a wand over someone should be quick and easy. I've been wanded a few times myself. In my experience, it''s been a slam dunk process. This woman was checked and rechecked. She could have completely undressed and got dressed again longer than it took TSA to clear her. The whole time she was being checked, her baby is off to the side in the stroller. There's nothing worse as a parent to be in a situation when you are in a busy place with your eye off your child. The child was not taken anywhere, but the woman might have been thinking the child could have been.
Even though TSA did not separate this woman from her child, as the woman claimed an agent did, I'd say that TSA didn't do a whole lot to ensure that this woman would give them high marks on customer service. If anything, it looks to me like the TSA agent was having a bit of a power play.
In Katie's post, she mentioned that she didn't think the woman was separated from her belongings like she claims she was. I think she was.
From what I saw, a woman with blond hair gathered the belongings off the conveyor belt. It took some time for the mother to be reunited with her belongings, some of which belonged to her child. One of the belongings was a laptop. It doesn't take long for a laptop to be snatched.
Like Katie said, the woman didn't appear to make a phone call to her mother or her husband on her cell phone like she claimed she did--unless it is a teensy tiny cell phone that none of us can see.
Maybe it was a cell phone of her imagination--the one that she uses whenever she's fending off an anxiety attack. Regardless of the details about this story that are not true, TSA at this particular airport, at least, still has some work to do.
Perhaps this particular TSA could take pointers from this security sign at the airport in Houston.
"Families and Those Needing Special Attention" are listed first. "Small children; strollers" are under the first bullet point.
If a mom (or a dad) and the baby in arms beep, help them first--with a smile. Say, "Sorry to inconvience you, but I need to find out why you beeped. Thanks for your understanding."
It will work like a charm.
Filed under: Blogs, United States, Airports, News







Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Hagan Oct 17th 2009 9:26PM
Full disclosure: I am not a mom on anxiety medication
That being said, people in the travel industry going to have to deal with jerks, and travelers are going to have to deal with employees on power trips. Obviously, Jaime sides with the mom, Katie sides with the TSA (it's not that black and white; you both cede some issues to either party); the bottom line is that people are people, and when someone escalates an interaction, the other person involved matches their intensity.
Who do you think it was? The person who lied about the phone and being separated from her child (within sight the whole time, we can all agree), or the person who's been trained to deal with this and does so on a daily basis?
http://wanderingfoodie.com - "Expert Traveler"
Me Oct 18th 2009 4:18PM
I was just wondering what the lady had concealed up her left pant leg, in a baggy taped to left calf? Whatever it was, it was found. That covert action alone could have warranted a full body search of the traveler and baby. Who knows what else is hidden? I am not going to make a full judgment on what was found (11:06 to 11:08 in the film), however, in my opinion, I see something that may contain batteries and may even vibrate. Something like that can be really embarrassing appearing on an xray machine viewer. Whatever it was, taping it to ones leg and attempting to walk through an airport scanner is a really dumb idea.
Bcteagirl Oct 18th 2009 1:35AM
If she is as prone to anxiety as she says (e.g. emergency xanax) the procedure may have been slow because they had to take an inordinate amount of time to calm her down. They are not going to run a check on someone who is busy panicking or yelling. While the box is a bit much, past that point she did a lot to slow down the procedure itself. They even had trouble just getting her to hold her arms out rather than forward. A shouting, panicked traveller is going to slow things down not only for herself but everyone around here. I really fail to see how this is a surprise to anyone?
Jim Oct 18th 2009 7:32AM
No. She's just a plain out liar, who thought she could generate some traffic for her site by fabricating an encounter with the TSA, who she didn't imagine would so effectively and efficiently fight back.
She faces web ridicule and, frankly, deserves it.
Lizzie Oct 18th 2009 9:48PM
I agree with Jim. She is a flat-out liar. Nothing bad happened to her. Nothing. So what that she had to stand in the box? She was there for less than two minutes. Less than two minutes. And going into that enclosure is the standard procedure if you have to be searched -- go in the box and wait for a female agent to search you. I don't care if she was stressed out. Get there early so that you feel you have time for any issues you may encounter, particularly if you are traveling with a small child. Plus, having stuff taped to her leg??? I am glad that TSA searched her closely after finding that. Anyone with half a brain would not try to sneak an object through security by taping it to her body, even if it wasn't contraband. She is just wrong. There's no side to her "side" of it.
Em Finn Oct 18th 2009 9:44PM
She attempted to go through airport security with a device (hem-hem) of some sort hidden strapped to her leg.
The only failing on the part of the security services were that she was permitted fly at all.
She had an unpleasant experience because she behaved in a manner indicating being too dumb to fly.
She brought it all on herself, and then lied copiously about it.
cavale Oct 25th 2009 3:01PM
did you actually read her blog?
it was an ACE BANDAGE.
Joedrumma Oct 18th 2009 9:56PM
She was in the plexigalss area (which is wide open on the other end for 90 seconds, which is how long it took to find a 2nd level, female screener. She started getting anxious around the 45 second mark. 90 seonds to wait is not unreasonable. The wanding process took time because both she and the bay had to be wanded. She had to allow for this, but she also states that she was being difficult. She actually had to be wanded twice because she didn't disclose the knee brace. They had to remove that and x-ray it seperately, and then return it to her. They wanded her before it was removed and then wanded her again afterwards. The whole process from the time she entered the plexi until she was released was 8 minutes. Is this really an unreasonable amount of time for an admitted difficult person and a baby to pass through a 2nd level screening? Are we really that spoiled?
michael Jan 13th 2010 2:08PM
A lot of what you've written is attempting to support an agency taking the initiative approach thereby exempting the public from the experience of being responsible. Other than the point that there are some jerks who man the TSA checkpoints, the rest of it effectively supports abdication of responsibility on the part of the person (customer) involved...to whit:
1. Who's responsible for arriving with enough time to get through the well publicized length of time getting through the checkpoints can take? THE CUSTOMER
2. Who's responsible as a single parent for allowing for all the rigamarole it takes to manage the child? It can't be the first time the single parent has taken the kid anywhere...so who's responsible for knowing the check through procedure and then streamlining the process for themselves and their child? THE CUSTOMER
3. Who's responsible for their ability to handle authority figures? THE CUSTOMER (dumping the issue on the fact of authority figures affecting us, is simply saying I'm unwilling to handle my own emotional conflcts on this topic)
4. Who's responsible for handling their level of anxiety in uncertain situations? THE CUSTOMER (a certain level of emotional maturity is certainly expected after all, this wasn't Mexico or Turkey and it wasn't the experience of Midnight Express. If you're not doing something illegal, there is little to fear from authorities in a public situation. there are far too many cell phone cameras available to document abuse.
5. I don't know about you but when is the last time you responded graciously to someone shouting and screaming epithets at you? Who's responsible for maintaining a civil level of communication? THE CUSTOMER
And when we as adults act out our anxiety on others then we are behaving like children and putting people in positions of authority to be parental in their relationship to us. If this mom had this kid at home acting the way she did, she'd have sent them to their room, denied them dessert, made this sit quiet time and might even have spanked him. If one is embarking on situations that have the potential for anxiety, then the adult thing to do is to learn to manage our anxiety and pre-empt as many of the circumstances that can trigger it as possible. Then if circumstances arise, the adult thing to do is to respond as graciously as possible with as much equanimity as we can muster and communicate from there. However, to advocate that the TSA needs to change their behavior to accomodate adults who are not responsible for handling their anxiety triggers and levels...is to advocate giving free reign to adults acting as children. And THAT is the crux of this situation. In our country (I can't speak for other countries) we have made it fashionable to see the world through the lens of victim/victimizer rather than through the lens of personal responsiblity. I would hope that we eventually grow up.