Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Toronto,
Puerto Rico.
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2012 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-27-2009 @ 10:11AM
Lauryn said...
I've actually also read that the original bans were lobbied for by cotton farmers, because hemp is a strong, useful fiber that grows without pesticides or artificial fertilizers and was used for many things, like ropes on ships, paper, and clothing, and the cotton farmers felt rightly threatened by it. Even though a different species is used for hemp and for marijuana, both were lumped together at the time, and continue to be now, even though the hemp plant does not contain enough THC to produce any sort of high, and hemp used in this country today has to be imported, which is a shame, especially considering the versatility of hemp fiber and the ease with which it grows naturally. I don't have a link about the cotton farmers' lobbying right now, but I find it highly plausible.