Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Rental cars,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel deals
Travel Guides:
New York City,
San Francisco,
Las Vegas,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Venice,
Beijing,
Dubai,
Rio de Janeiro,
Bangkok,
Costa Rica
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2013 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-27-2009 @ 12:34AM
Traytable said...
A planned emergency is where there is time to make some kind of preparation for the events to come- whether that is a ditching, emergency landing or a full evacuation. For example, the plane experiences engine trouble, the pilots advise there is 15 minutes to landing, and the FAs have time to 'prep the cabin' (do a safety briefing, stow equipment, reassure pax etc)
Unplanned is where there is no warning for the crew- e.g. plane runs off the runway on landing, landing gear gives way, sudden engine fire on the stand- it pretty much means the crew are entirely unprepared & have no warning of what is about to happen, therefore they just go right into the emergency procedures. Planned is preferable because at least one can try prepare the passengers for what to expect and what to do.
I believe the Hudson was unplanned as the FAs literally had like 2 minutes notice, not nearly enough to prep the cabin for ditching, they had to do it as they went...
Planned would be, for example, the Qantas plane last year which lost the cabin pressure. They would have prepared the cabin for an emergency landing and potential evacuation if required.
Reply