Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Toronto,
Puerto Rico.
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2012 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-08-2009 @ 2:57AM
Louis Haar said...
Although this sounds like a crackpot idea, Michael O'Leary is a shrewd businessman and I suspect he has done some research to check the viability of this. He must be aware that there is a ready market of punters willing to stand for anything, excuse the pun. Safety should be the issue but actually isn't. Cheaper travel on short flights is the issue and one must remember that although airline travel is very safe, there are many safety related products and systems that are not incorporated into commercial aviation due to costs. But people still fly.
Look at the giant Airbus A380. Latest technology but people still face forwards.
Military transports favor rearward facing seats for safety reasons, but the airline industry feel the pax won't like it. So it doesn't happen. If a fully loaded airbus crashes, over 500 pax face death. But that didn't stop A.I developing and building it. I won't use it......tooooo risky.
Reply