Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Last-Minute Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Tokyo,
Minneapolis,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Mexico City,
Copenhagen,
Sydney,
Bangkok,
Bogota,
Toronto,
Costa Rica,
Bermuda,
Puerto Rico
All contents copyright © 2003-2009, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved
Gadling is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-23-2009 @ 3:05PM
Joe said...
I'm sure Airbus is taking note at how Boeing has cut their own throat to please their investors. I think this will go down in the annals of history of how not to outsource. Especially something as complex as a passenger airplane. In the beginning I was truly excited to see the specs and renderings of the 787, but now I simply don't care if it ever gets off the ground. Though I'm sure it will with enough government stimulus checks.
Boeing has taken decades of experience (over half a century) in manufacturing planes and pissed it away by saying, "hey we can save a little bit of money by letting someone else with little or no experience do it". I understand outsourcing and its benefits but I don't understand this at all. I don't know any other company that has outsourced at this level. Banks don't outsource banking, software companies don't outsource their software so why would an airplane manufacturer outsource its core business.
I lay this firmly at the feet of McNerny and his bean counters in Seattle, Chicago, or wherever they hell they decided to move the company.
Reply