Skip to Content

Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.

Map of the world

Would you pay for an empty bladder?

Aaron Hotfelder votes "Yes!" for Ryanair's pay-to-play approach to in-flight urination. I go with more of a "maybe," as I tend to support anything that helps airlines bring in a bit more cash – after all, they need it. But, I can see why the average passenger wouldn't be too thrilled about popping a few coins in the slot. Apparently, there are plenty of people out there with opinions.

TripAdvisor just conducted an online poll; 5,300 people responded. The results are as predictable as you'd expect. An overwhelming 78 percent of respondents are not interested in shelling out cash for the privilege of flushing. Can you blame 'em? When you stroll down the aisle toward that green light (i.e., "vacant"), you have one thing on your mind, and it isn't the change in your pocket. Another 19 percent feel that pay-to-pee is reasonable ... if the flight is cheap enough. The remaining 3 percent would be willing to pay regardless of the cost of the flight.

Thankfully, Ryanair tends to stay short-haul, so if you hit the bathroom before you board, you should be fine until landing.

Would you pay to pee?
Yes, airlines need the cash79 (3.1%)
Yes, but only if the flight's dirt cheap278 (11.0%)
Only if the airline comps me tons of liquor208 (8.2%)
Never!1969 (77.7%)


More crazy stories from the skies




Filed under: Europe, United Kingdom, Airlines

Search Travel Deals

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)

Gadling Features

Categories

Become our Fan on Facebook!

Featured Galleries (view all)

The Volvo Ocean Race onboard Team Abu Dhabi
Virgin Galactic's Gateway to Space
Breakfasts around the world
FoodFlags
Outrageous State Fair Foods
The world's ten most uninhabited countries
Yellowstone in pictures: 2011
Most crowded islands on earth
Burj Khalifa: The tallest building on the planet

Our Writers

Grant Martin

Editor-in-chief

RSS Feed

Don George

Features Editor

RSS Feed

View more Writers