Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
Click on a label to read posts from that part of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More from AOL Travel:
Airline tickets,
Hotel reservations,
Car rental,
Vacation packages,
Discount cruises,
Travel Deals
Travel Guides:
Las Vegas,
New York City,
Los Angeles,
Boston,
Chicago,
Washington, DC,
London,
Rome,
Paris,
Phoenix,
Austin,
Charlotte,
San Diego,
Toronto,
Puerto Rico.
Travel Ideas:
Adventure,
Asia Travel,
Beaches,
Cruises,
Europe Travel,
Foodie Travel,
Healthy Travel,
Holiday Travel,
International Destinations,
National Parks,
Skiing,
Travel Blogs,
Travel Tips,
Travel Photography,
US Destinations,
Weekend Getaways
© 2012 AOL Inc. All rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks | AOL A-Z HELP | Advertise With Us | About Our Ads
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-19-2009 @ 4:34PM
Evan MacKinnon said...
This is rather disappointing from an aviation standpoint -- but I think it's just a case of poor understanding on aircraft. I've always questioned turbo-prop as opposed to jet engines and decided that in the highly unlikely, but least remote of accidents, a jet engine would do far more damage to an aircrafts contents than a turbo-prop if it were to, say... have a miss-alignment of a compressor blade or something. Propellors just don't have those problems. So I think it's safe to say that there really isn't a difference, but it's nice to see these lovely people injecting their cash into a struggling economy!
Reply